1 / 16

Conceptual design of superconducting correctors for Hi- Lumi Project (v2)

Conceptual design of superconducting correctors for Hi- Lumi Project (v2). F. Toral - CIEMAT. CIEMAT, March 7th, 2013. Outline. Last magnetic calculations Cross section of the magnets Superferric dipole design Conclusions. 2. Last magnetic calculations.

asher-wells
Download Presentation

Conceptual design of superconducting correctors for Hi- Lumi Project (v2)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Conceptual design of superconducting correctors for Hi-Lumi Project (v2) F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT, March 7th, 2013

  2. Outline • Last magnetic calculations • Cross section of the magnets • Superferric dipole design • Conclusions 2

  3. Last magnetic calculations • New calculations have been done assuming a higher nonlinearity of the transfer function: 20% of saturation at nominal current. That is, the actual field at nominal current is 80% of the computed value by extrapolation of the transfer function at low currents. • The requirement on integrated strength of the decapole and dodecapole, normal and skew in both cases, has been reduced by 25%. • The cross talk between two identical consecutive magnets is negligible. Next model will include different magnets, to define the minimum distance between them. 3

  4. Last magnetic calculations 4

  5. Outline • Last magnetic calculations • Cross section of the magnets • Superferric dipole design • Conclusions 5

  6. Cross section: quadrupole 6

  7. Transfer function: quadrupole Units (1E-4) Gradient T/m Normalized current Normalized current 7

  8. Cross section: sextupole 8

  9. Cross section: octupole 9

  10. Cross section: decapole 10

  11. Cross section: dodecapole 11

  12. Cross section: dodecapole 12

  13. Outline • Last magnetic calculations • Cross section of the magnets • Superferric dipole design • Conclusions 13

  14. Superferric dipole design (I) 14

  15. Superferric dipole design (II) • The maximum allowed outer diameter is 620 mm. • The present design has not included iron holes: there are holes for the cryogenic lines, but others can be used for the field shaping due to the iron saturation. • The present optimization has been done only by iron pole morphing. The main field is about 1.5 T, which is too low to be competitive with a cos-theta design. • What is the request for the field quality? 10 units (1E-3) is good enough? • Optimization is still ongoing. 15

  16. Conclusions • A new design with higher saturation has been performed (20% of non-linearity of the transfer function). • The cross talk between consecutive magnets is being computed. • The cross section of the different magnets have been shown. • A superferric dipole design is being analysed to provide 2.5 or 4 Tm. The optimization is still ongoing. • The framework for this Collaboration needs to be defined. 16

More Related