1 / 4

Model Modular Participants Agreement

Model Modular Participants Agreement. March 29, 2013 This meeting is being Recorded. Welcome!. Agenda. Roll Call Sub-task Group 1 : Revisions to R 1.1 based on HIPAA Omnibus Final Rule Allen to provide update on straw-man Draft 1

ashton
Download Presentation

Model Modular Participants Agreement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Model Modular Participants Agreement March 29, 2013 This meeting is being Recorded

  2. Welcome!

  3. Agenda • Roll Call • Sub-task Group 1: Revisions to R 1.1 based on HIPAA Omnibus Final Rule • Allen to provide update on straw-man Draft 1 • Sub-task Group 2: Inventory of extant Inter-HIO agreements and comparative analysis • Aaron to provide update regarding resources to produce analysis and other related developments • Closing Comments, All • Meeting Adjourned Next Meeting: Friday, April 5th

  4. 1. Allen Briskin led a discussion regarding the feedback received to the draft that was commented on by the sub - task group members la st week. The recommendation from the folks on the call was for Allen to finalize the changes to the straw - man (with one additional footnote discussed on the call) and share with the team as a candidate final version of updates to the MMPA to reflect Omnib us final rule requirements. 2. The Chairs discussed potential modifications to Section 2.2B of the MMPA. This section speaks specifically to the obligations on the part of an HIO that has entered in to an agreement with another HIO (as identified in their po licies and procedures). The discussion was specifically related to alternative language to current language (see below). Austin O’Flynn and Allen volunteered to iterate on a straw - man version of alternatives to be considered by the group at our next call – accompanied by a diagram illustrating the alternatives disclosure flows. 3. Finally, Steven Bonorris presented an overview of the SOW that has been crafted for his team at UC Hastings to do the research and analysis called for by the InterHIO sub - task grou p a few weeks back. At the end of Steven’s presentation he asked if Task Force members would be willing to respond to some questions to help ensure the work produced by his team is as aligned with our needs as possible. All members felt that this would b e best accomplished via email. Tayo will be working with Steven to get an email out to all Task Group members to help collect input from everyone to inform the development of the matrix and related deliverable content. Post-Meeting Summary

More Related