140 likes | 336 Views
Visions of the Future Revisited. We are mankind because we survive. We have come full circle. During our various inquiries we got useful insights about individual environmental & natural resource problems Now, let us combine those insights and assess the two visions. Addressing the Issue.
E N D
Visions of the Future Revisited We are mankind because we survive.
We have come full circle. • During our various inquiries we got useful insights about individual environmental & natural resource problems • Now, let us combine those insights and assess the two visions
Addressing the Issue • Issue of growth in a finite environment – focus on 3 issues: • How is the problem correctly conceptualised? • Can our political & economic institutions respond in time democratically to the challenges presented? • Can the needs of the present generation be met without compromising the ability of the future generations to meet their needs?
In the beginning : if demand is & supply is finite resources will exhaust & society will collapse • Price is not the only factor that retards demand growth – ↓ population plays a significant role too • Characterising resource base as finite is harsh – ignores existence of renewable resources, focuses attention to wrong issues – supports ill-conceived attempts to measure size of resource base
Resource base is not finite - “There is energy everywhere. Choose the renewable one. Mother earth’s resources will never get over, as long as you do your bit.” – wind, solar & wave energy • Prices are going down but technology is improving – competition ↑ and we can afford to sell at lower prices • Historically, very little evidence supports a fear of impeding scarcity of minerals – extraction costs ↓ • How long will this continue?
Errors made by both – those who understate adequacy of resources & those who point to abundance • The problem is not finiteness but it is the way they are managed • Either pessimistic or optimistic views are wrong – improper incentives & inadequate information are serious – considering unlimited resources is equally wrong • Plenty are available if we are ready to pay price – need to transition to renewable / recyclable resources has already begun
Institutional Responses • Markets have responded quickly to deal with scarcity & showing prices • Substitution encouraged – recycling growing – consumers’ habits changing • Government intervention needed to ensure that the firm which neglects environmental damage in their operating decisions do not gain a competitive edge • Each problem to be treated case by case
Market may automatically choose a dynamically efficient or sustainable path for future – imperfections in the market make sustainable development difficult • Left to itself market will over-exploit free access resources – thus reducing the benefits of the future generations • Sustainability guarantee with falling depletable resources requires compensation from present to future generations – financial payments can’t adequately compensate future generations
Government intervention – in controlling pollution – firms may underprice their goods that add to pollution – intervention to ensure that firms that neglect environmental damage in their operating decisions do not gain a competitive edge • Unreasonably tough legislations are almost impossible to enforce • With price controls, incentives for supply reduced and the time profile of consumption is tilted towards present – water supply at subsidized rate • Price control – key role in hunger problem – undervalue agriculture – in LR imports when foreign exchange is scarce – in developed countries price decontrol
Sustainable Development • Economic growth in individual nations is due to in inputs & technological progress – labour may not ↑ in future at same rate – limits to tech progress - growth stationary state ultimately zero • Empirical evidence shows that • Environmental control – no large impact on the economy as a whole • Environmental policy has contributed more jobs than it has cost • Has triggered just a little in the rate of inflation & mild reduction in growth ∴ environment & healthy economy are compatible
Respecting environment is incompatible with healthy economy is demonstrably wrong – economies transformed: ↑ in population & ↑ in importance of information • ‘All people automatically benefit by growth’ is naïve - ↑ leisure, longer life expectancy, ↑ goods & services – ecological foot-prints • New forms of development will be necessary • Economic incentive approach to environment – incentives changed by fees or charges, by liability laws or transferable permits
Public policy & sustainable development should support each other – govt should send right signals through markets • Global problems – creative policies • A good partnership between public & private sectors • Current NI accounting system is wrong as doesn’t measure welfare – not considering damage done to natural resources that is irreversible
Concluding comments • United responsibility • Cannot catch every offender – high degree of voluntary compliance is necessary for smooth working of system • Producers – safety of their products • understand our responsibility as consumers – purchases to reflect environmental values in such away that market moves in right direction
We are at the end of an era and also at the beginning of the other • Future holds transformation in many ways • Obstacles will be there as they are today too, but we are making progress, for sure!!