1 / 23

Strategic Choice Approach

Strategic Choice Approach. An Example of Soft Operational Research Adapted from Amare Michael Desta. Problem Structuring Methods. Primary focus is usually on the people involved with the problem; Secondary focus will be on the problem itself;

ashtyn
Download Presentation

Strategic Choice Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Strategic Choice Approach An Example of Soft Operational Research Adapted from Amare Michael Desta

  2. Problem Structuring Methods • Primary focus is usually on the people involved with the problem; • Secondary focus will be on the problem itself; • This can change our view of what we mean by a successful intervention.

  3. Origins of the Approach • More empirical than theoretical; • Describes some methods for dealing with complex decision problems; • Based on observations of how managers cope with dilemmas; • A mixture of practical and intuitive methods; • Recognises the importance of uncertainty, and responses to types of uncertainty.

  4. UE UV We need more information We need clearer policies How do we respond to this choice? Uncertainty about guiding values Uncertainty about our working environment We need broader perspectives Uncertainty about related agendas UR

  5. Issues Progress Package Decisions Shape Choose Preferences And Uncertainties Problem Focus Design Compare Range of Strategies

  6. Crime is a real problem in this country. We are spending more and more on locking up increasing numbers of people in prisons, yet crime goes on rising. Many of those in prison are there for reasons connected with medical problems (e.g. drug addiction, mental illness) yet when they come out these problems are unresolved and so they go straight back to crime. Perhaps the answer is longer prison sentences.

  7. Dynamics of Strategic ChoiceShaping Mode • Decision areas are described as questions – areas where alternative courses of action are possible; • The decisions are then presented on a decision graph.

  8. Improve prison Medical care Build more Prisons? Increase rewards For informing? Impose longer Sentences?

  9. Identify Problem Focus • Select three or four decision areas; • Usually these are important, urgent and/or connected; • Add any factors as necessary to the uncertainty list.

  10. Example Problem Focus • Build more prisons? • Impose longer sentences? • Increase rewards for informing? • Can we find more sites to build more prisons (UE)?

  11. Dynamics of Strategic ChoiceDesigning Mode For each problem focus we: • List a small number actions in each area; • List incompatible options; • List all feasible decision schemes by selecting an action from each area.

  12. Example Option GraphLines Show Incompatibilities Build More Prisons? Yes Ten More No Yes Five More No Increase Rewards For Informing? Yes No Yes Impose Longer Sentences?

  13. Feasible Decision Schemes

  14. Uncertainty List The list of uncertainties now has two more factors: • Can we find sites for more prisons (UE)? • Will ten prisons be too many (UE)? • Will Government/legal profession support longer sentences (UV)?

  15. Dynamics of Strategic ChoiceComparing Mode In this mode we compare the decision schemes using: • Identifying comparison areas; • Within each area assign a value to each scheme.

  16. Example Comparison Areas We can compare each scheme in terms of: • Capital cost (£ millions); • Running costs (£ millions); • Acceptability to government (1–10 scale in which 1 is not acceptable) ; • Acceptability to the public (1-10 scale).

  17. Comparison of Schemes

  18. Comparison Schemes In comparing schemes we must always be aware of the uncertainty areas. In comparing schemes A and B we must consider the uncertainties associated with scheme B.

  19. Dynamics of Strategic ChoiceChoosing Mode We construct a commitment package which consists of: • Decisions taken now; • Explorations to reduce uncertainty; • Decisions to be deferred until later; • Contingency plans.

  20. Example Commitment Package • Decisions taken now – none; • Explorations - identify sites for 5 prisons; - consult government/legal agencies over longer sentences; • Decisions deferred – final decision on scheme B; • Contingency plans – none.

  21. Conclusions Technology Provides a set of tools to facilitate and structure communication. The way that discussion sessions are structured and run is important.

  22. Conclusions (Contd…) Organisation The emphasis is on temporary groupings of staff that cut across organisational boundaries. Process Emphasis is on flexibility rather than strict adherence to procedures.

  23. Conclusions (Contd…) Products The process can produce not only visible products like agreed actions and policy changes, but also invisible products in the form of changed perceptions and views of participants.

More Related