1 / 19

Dealing with Free E-Journals: Are they worth the effort?

Dealing with Free E-Journals: Are they worth the effort?. Beth R Bernhardt Electronic Resources Librarian UNC Greensboro. Free vs Open Access. All Open Access journals are free, but not all free journals are Open Access

atalo
Download Presentation

Dealing with Free E-Journals: Are they worth the effort?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dealing with Free E-Journals: Are they worth the effort? Beth R Bernhardt Electronic Resources Librarian UNC Greensboro

  2. Free vs Open Access • All Open Access journals are free, but not all free journals are Open Access • Librarians make a distinction between the two categories, but library patrons do not

  3. Myths about free ejournals 1. "Free ejournals aren’t indexed. And if they aren't indexed no one can find them." • http://www.freemedicaljournals.com

  4. More myths about free ejournals 2. "Free ejournals aren't the kind of thing that faculty will ever publish in." • Molecular & Cellular Biology • Lawrence, Steve. “Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact”, Nature, 521, May 2001. 3. "Free ejournals have no quality control; they aren’t refereed." • http://www.doaj.org

  5. More myths about free ejournals 4. "Its all science stuff. Where are all the humanities and social science journals?"" • Compact memory - http://www.compactmemory.de/ • Utah newspapers - http://digitalnewspapers.org/ • Hearth - http://hearth.library.cornell.edu/h/hearth/browse/journals.html

  6. More myths about free ejournals 5. "Free e-journals (like so many other ejournals), almost never have substantial backfiles" • Journal of General Physiology (1918-) http://www.jgp.org • American memory - http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/ndlpcoop/moahtml/snctitles.html • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (1665-1886)

  7. Many free ejournals …are indexed …are high impact …are refereed …have good backfiles

  8. Where are we today? • If libraries really support OA, then one would assume that we would be pretty aggressive about making free content readily available to our users through library systems and access points (e.g. ILS, knowledge base, web site). Is that what libraries are doing today?

  9. Providing access – the current picture The Methodology • I searched for four OA titles from DOAJ • AAPPS Bulletin (Physics) • Animal Biodiversity and Conservation (Zoology) • Animus: a philosophical journal for our time (Phil.) • Australian Prescriber (Medicine) • I searched 5 ARL libraries, 5 non-ARL academic libraries, and 5 special libraries • I looked in both the catalog and in independent A-Z listings or link resolvers (where available)

  10. Providing access – the current picture Five Special Libraries • No one had any of the 4 titles in their catalog • One had 1 title in an A-Z, and one had all 4 • Five Academic • No one had any of the 4 titles in their catalog • One had 3 titles in an A-Z • Five Academic ARL • 4 had some in their catalog, and 2 had all 4 • Three had all 4 and one had 3 in A-Z/resolver

  11. Providing access – the current picture I also looked for 4 non-DOAJ titles • PNAS (1915- , 6 month embargo) • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (1999- , 1 year embargo) • Economic Perspectives (1996- ) • African-American Archaeology Newsletter (1994-2000) • While the 15 libraries had 37 access points for the 4 DOAJ titles, they had only 28 for the non-DOAJ titles

  12. Why the reliance on DOAJ? • DOAJ has become “the” Open Access journal site for libraries because • It is of a manageable size • Many librarians may think it is comprehensive • It is well organized and easy to harvest • Does it meet library users’ demands for free serial literature?

  13. UNCG usage data • UNCG has over 11,000 free serials in Journal Finder (73% have been used at UNCG) with over 190,000 uses - from 2002 to present

  14. UNCG Usage and DOAJ • Of the top 30 most heavily used free titles, only one was in DOAJ • Titles were not in DOAJ because • Local newspaper (e.g. Raleigh and G’boro) • Not current (e.g. Scientific American) • Embargoed (e.g. BMJ)

  15. Paid vs. Free • Paid/free overlap • OneFile – over 450 • EBSCO ASP – over 400 • PQ Research Library – about 250 • Rank in accesses via Journal Finder • 2nd of 223 FT sources at UNCG • Tied for 1st of 44 FT sources at GTCC • 1st of 36 FT sources at CPCC

  16. What are we doing now? - Conclusions • Many libraries do not provide access points to free serials, especially through their catalogs • Those that do provide access rely primarily on DOAJ • DOAJ does not include all Open Access titles and doesn’t include thousands of free titles • Libraries should be doing more to make free serials accessible. After all, Google lists them all.

  17. Alternatives • Harvesting • Highwire, http://www.highwire.org • FreeMedicalJournals.com • Scielo, http://www.scielo.org • EMIS, http://www.emis.de/journals/short_index.html

  18. Are free journals worth the time? • Number of free titles in Journal Finder –over 11,000 • Number used at UNCG - 73% • Total uses of free titles - over 190,000 • Average time it takes to add a title to Journal Finder - 1 minute

  19. Thank you Beth Bernhardt, brbernha@uncg.edu

More Related