1 / 37

Nelson Creek – Removal of Fish Barrier

Nelson Creek – Removal of Fish Barrier. Client: Washington State Department of Transportation December 4, 2013 Rainy Day Industries Justin Monsrud Clay Peterman Cheryl Preston. Location Map for Nelson Creek.

ave
Download Presentation

Nelson Creek – Removal of Fish Barrier

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nelson Creek – Removal of Fish Barrier Client: Washington State Department of Transportation December4, 2013 Rainy Day Industries Justin Monsrud Clay Peterman Cheryl Preston

  2. Location Map for Nelson Creek This project is located in Clallam County, Wa on SR-112 mile post 47.1 at the crossing of Nelson Creek. The site is location in the Olympic Region west of Port Angeles

  3. Project Description • Removal of existing box culvert • Construction of a 16’ wide by 10’ high culvert • Precast 3-sided culvert with wing walls. • Strip footing foundations • 130’ long structural earth wall on South side • Reconstruct existing embankments to a slope of 2H:1V • New pavement for roadway • Approximately 175’

  4. Project Justification • The restoration of declining salmon and trout populations • Inability to utilize spawning grounds • Opening passage to natural habitat • Coho Salmon and Steelhead • sea run and resident Cutthroat Trout

  5. Project Scope • develop a traffic re-routing plan • Pavement design of new roadway • Existing impervious surface 17780 approx. 740 ft. • New impervious surface 4200 approx. 175 ft. • Embankment improvements • Earth wall and erosion control design • Removal of existing culvert • Design of new culvert, wing walls, foundation and strip footings.

  6. Plan View

  7. The Team • Roles and Responsibilities: • Culvert and strip footing designs. • Primary: Justin Monsrud • Secondary: Clay Peterman • Structural earth wall and embankments. • Primary: Clay Peterman • Secondary: Cheryl Preston • Traffic routing and control and pavement design. • Primary: Cheryl Preston • Secondary: Justin Monsrud

  8. Permits and Approval • Local permits for approval: • Clearing, grading, and building permit • Critical area ordinance • Noise variance • State permits for approval: • Aquatic lands permit • Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) • Federal permits for approval: • CWA Section 401 • CWA Section 402 • Endangered Species Section 7

  9. Temporary Traffic Management Plan • Temporary Bridge • Advantages • Convenience for motorist • No need to detour off site • Disadvantages • Safety of workers and motorists • Traffic can avoid a long detour • High cost • Off-Site Detour • Advantages • Safety for workers and motorists • Minimizes cost • More construction area • Faster construction time • Disadvantages • Less convenient • Impact emergency & school routs • Staged Construction • Advantages • No need for property acquisition • Less inconvenience for traffic • Disadvantages • Worker/traffic safety • Difficult to work around • Increase in construction time and cost

  10. Temporary Traffic Management Plan • Decision Matrix • Scale 1-10 • 10 most desirable • Decision • Off-site detour for construction of culvert and pavement • Staged construction for site preparation and earth wall constriction

  11. Soil Borrow • Decision Matrix: • Gravel borrow chosen. • Less sensitivity to moisture.

  12. Culvert Design • Culvert sidewalls are loaded axially and laterally. Have to consider ΦPn and ΦMn. Have to develop a interaction diagram and also consider the limit of cracking at service state.

  13. Culvert Design Channel restoration • Culvert bed material will consist of well graded stream bed sediment (Standard spec 9-03.11.1), stream bed cobbles (Standard spec 9-03.11.2), and stream bed boulders (Standard sec 9-03-.11.3)

  14. Culvert Design • For Precast Culvert installation we will need 14 units total to achieve 106 LF (14 joints adding 3.25” in length)

  15. Structural Earth Wall • South side of project. • Approximately 130 feet long. • No more than 20 feet exposed height. • A 4 foot bench before slope.

  16. Structural Earth Wall • Decision matrix for SE Wall selection. • Chose a gabion retaining wall.

  17. Structural Earth Wall Gabions Concrete Cantilever Sheet Piling

  18. Structural Earth Wall • Design: • 138 feet in length. • 18 feet tall at highest point. • Checks for overturning, sliding, and bearing capacity.

  19. Strip Footings

  20. WingwallDesign

  21. Grading • Requirements: • A 2H:1V slope. • Vegetation to be planted for erosion control

  22. Erosion Control • Vegetation: • Will be from native plants chosen based on effectiveness. • Other: • Wattles, compost socks, and and erosion control blankets will be considered.

  23. Pavement Design • Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCCP) • Pavement design analysis • Does not perform well with long term settlement • Life cycle cost analysis • Risk analysis: present worth is $29,100 • Project specific details • Does not match current pavement type. • Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) • Pavement design analysis • Performs well with long term settlement • Life cycle cost analysis • Risk analysis: present worth is $13,835 • Project specific details • Matches current pavement type

  24. Pavement Design • Decision Matrix • Scale 1-10 • 10 most desirable • Decision • Pavement type will be HMA with bituminous surface treatment

  25. Pavement Design • Average Daily Traffic (ADT): • 951 units, 26.5% truck traffic • Equivalent Single Axle Load (ESAL): • Design year =201,081. total design=27,418,510 • 15 year performance grade binder: • PG64-16 http://www.pavementinteractive.org/wsdot-esal-application/ LTPPBIND Software

  26. Pavement Design Section 3 WADOT’s Pavement Policy Section 5.2 WSDOT’s Pavement Policy Minimum shoulder requirements Section 5.2.5 WSDOT’s Pavement Policy

  27. Traffic Barrier Design • Beam Guardrail • Advantages • Most common on roadsides • Small deflection • Disadvantages • Snow drifts and drainage problems • Concrete Barrier • Advantages • Low maintenance cost • Small deflection • Disadvantages • Requires heavy equipment • Snow drifts and drainage problems • Cable Barrier • Advantages • No drainage problems • Fewer potential environmental impacts • Disadvantages • Large deflection

  28. Traffic Barrier Design • Decision Matrix • Scale 1-10 • 10 most desirable • Decision • Beam Guardrail

  29. Traffic Barrier Design • Beam guardrail type 31 allows 28-31 inch rail height tolerance – Section 1610.06(1) • Terminal ET-31 (TL3) or SKT-SP-MGS (TL3) – Section 1610.06(5)(a) • Anchor Type 10 – Section 1610.06(5)(e) • Steel guardrail posts – Section 1610.06(3) • Guardrail placement case 2-31 for two-way traffic – Section 1610.06(7)

  30. Questions?

  31. Temporary Traffic Management Plan • Off-Site Detour

  32. Temporary Traffic Management Plan • Staged Construction During Work Hours

  33. Temporary Traffic Management Plan • Staged Construction During Non-Work Hours

  34. Traffic Barrier Design • W-beam guardrail type 31

  35. Traffic Barrier Design • Guardrail type 31 placement type 2-31

  36. Traffic Barrier Design • Guardrail anchor type 10

  37. Traffic Barrier Design • Guardrail terminal ET-31 (TL3) or SKT-SP-MGS (TL3)

More Related