220 likes | 471 Views
Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma Case 1. James R. Berenson, MD Medical & Scientific Director Institute for Myeloma & Bone Cancer Research Los Angeles, CA. Disclosures. Speakers’ bureau, research support, and consulting: Amgen, Celgene, Millennium, and Onyx.
E N D
Relapsed and Refractory MyelomaCase 1 James R. Berenson, MD Medical & Scientific Director Institute for Myeloma & Bone Cancer Research Los Angeles, CA
Disclosures Speakers’ bureau, research support, and consulting: Amgen, Celgene, Millennium, and Onyx
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Case 1 76 year-old white female presented in Oct ‘11 w/ Severe mid-back pain Anemia w/ hemoglobin 10.0 Workup: Labs IgG 3760 M-protein 2.62 24-hour urine paraprotein 650 mg B2M 3.7, albumin 3.3 (Stage 2 ISS) Creatinine 1.5 Bone marrow 40% plasma cells Bone survey w/ lytic lesions throughout the axial skeleton and long bones and T10 VCF Patient received initial treatment Kyphoplasty at T10 Zoledronic acid 4 mg monthly Cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Case 1 (cont’d) Course Back pain resolved following kyphoplasty After 4 cycles of initial therapy IgG 1170 (from 3760) M-protein 0.59 (from 2.62) 24-hour urine M-protein 45 mg (from 650 mg) Other labs- creatinine 1.0, hemoglobin 11.7 Patient continued treatment for 3 additional cycles w/ myeloma labs increasing IgG 1500 M-protein 0.79 24 hour urine paraprotein 81 mg Other labs- creatinine 1.1, hemoglobin 11.5
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Case 1 At this point, you should Start lenalidomide and oral steroids Stop CYBORD Repeat labs Continue present regimen Start another bortezomib-containing combination
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Case 1 Labs were repeated 1 month later IgG now 1800 M-protein 1.01 24 hour urine M-protein 237 mg Creatinine 1.5; hemoglobin 10.6 What next?
Individualize Your Choice for the Myeloma Patient Based on: • How active is the patient? • Mobility? • Is potential neuropathy an issue? (e.g.- surgeon, pianist) • Renal, • Bone, • Marrow, • Subjective, • Rate of ProgressionGenetics? Work/ Lifestyle Disease • Responseand for how long? • Side effects and tolerability • Diabetes mellitus (steroids) • Cardiac (Doxorubicin, PLD) • Neuropathy • (Thalidomide) Prior treatments Co-morbid conditions
Principles of Treating Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Be sure a patient has really progressed before changing therapy REPEAT MYELOMA LABS! Try to use drugs patient has not seen before HOWEVER, progression on one drug in combination does not mean that drug will not be effective w/ another agent e.g., pts progressing from bortezomib w/ melphalan often respond to bortezomib w/ PLD Even different drugs in the same class may be active so that bortezomib+melphalan failures may respond to other alkylating agents- cyclophosphamide or bendamustine LEN failures may respond to THAL or POM and vice versa bortezomib failures respond to carfilzomib pts progressing from a drug at one dose may respond to the same drug at a higher dose- e.g., LEN the same combination may be effective again if the patient has not seen the combination in a long time
Bortezomib + PLD vs. Bortezomib in Previously Treated MM BORT 1.3 mg/m2 PLD 30 mg/m2 1° Endpoint: TTP2° Endpoints: OS*, ORR N=646 (n=322) RANDOMI ZE q 3 weeks up to 8 cycles Days 1 4 8 11 q 3 weeks up to 8 cycles (n=324) *Not enough events to determine statistical significance in overall survival. ORR=overall response rate; OS=overall survival; TTP=time to progression. Ddoxorubicin HCl liposome injection Prescribing Information, Distributed by Ortho Biotech Products, L.P., Raritan, NJ. Rev’d May 2007
Bortezomib + Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) + Dexamethasone for Patients with Previously Untreated Myeloma:A Phase II Trial PLD: 5 mg/m2 IV infusion Dexamethasone 40 mg IV Bortezomib: 1.0 mg/m2 IV Cycle repeats Days 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 29 • MR: 86% • Reduced incidence of PN & PPE Berenson et al. Brit J Haematol, 2011
Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine plus Bortezomib in R/RMM: A Phase 1/2 trial Patients were assigned to one of 3 cohorts receiving doses of intravenous bendamustine at 50 mg/m2 (cohort 1), 70 mg/m2 (cohort 2), or 90 (cohort 3) mg/m2 in combination with a fixed dose of intravenous bortezomib (1.0 mg/m2) according to the schedule in Figure 1. Berenson et al. Brit J Haematol 2012
Bendamustine & Bortezomib: Results • No DLT was observed at any dose level • 50 mg/m2 (n = 5) • 70 mg/m2 (n = 4) • 90 mg/m2 (n = 5) • The maximum dose of bendamustine (90 mg/m2) was well tolerated in combination with bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 and was designated as the MTD • Overall response rate • Overall 48% (1 CR, 2 VGPR, 9 PR, & 7 MR) • At MTD (90 mg/m2) 52% • Bortezomib-exposed (n=31) 42% • Alkylator-exposed (n=28) 46%
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone in R/R MMPhase 3 Trials–Response1,2 • CR rates were significantly higher in the Len + Dex arm of each trial compared with Placebo + Dex (P < .001) • Both OS & TTP superior in Len + Dex arm CR, complete response; nCR, near complete response; Len + Dex,lenalidomide, dexamethasone; PR, partial response; ORR, overall response rate; RRMM, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. 1. Weber DM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2133-2142. 2. Dimopoulos M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2123-2132.
Phase II Study of Bortezomib plus Lenalidomide and Dex (VRD) in Rel/Ref MM: Updated Results After >2 Years’ Follow-up1 • Endpoints: Primary:PFS; Secondary: ORR (≥MR), DOR, TTP, OS, safety • Patients: 64 pts with relapsed/refractory MM; median age 65 years (range 32–83); ISS stage I/II/III/unknown (%): 27/25/23/25; median 2 (range 1–3) prior therapies • Study design: • Anticoagulation with aspirin ± warfarin or LMWH, and antiviral prophylaxis against herpes zoster were required Richardson PG et al. ASH 2010, abstract #3049
Phase II Study of Bortezomib plus Lenalidomide and Dex (VRD) in Rel/Ref MM: Updated Results After >2 Years’ Follow-up • Results: 62 pts evaluable for response • Median duration of ≥MR: 8.3 months • Median duration of ≥PR: 8.4 months • Safety: • Median cycles received: 11 (range 1–48) • Median treatment duration: 7.9 months (range 0.4–36); 66% of pts completed ≥8 cycles with all three drugs Richardson PG et al. ASH 2010, abstract #3049
DVD-R (Bortezomib + Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin + Dexamethasone + Lenalidomide) for Patients with R/R MM: A Phase II Trial PLD: 4 mg/m2 IV infusion Dexamethasone 40 mg IV Bortezomib: 1.0 mg/m2 IV Cycle repeats Days 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 29 Len 10 mg po qd d1-14 • MR: 85% • No PPE; PN only 25% Berenson et al. Leukemia 2012
Bendamustine (B) w/ Lenalidomide (L) and Dexamethasone (D): Phase 1/2 Trial • R/R MM patients • N=29 • Regimen (28-day cycles) • B 75-100 mg/m2 d1 & 2 • L 5-10 mg qd d1-21 • Dex 40 mg PO weekly • MTD: B 75/ L 10/ D 40 • Results (only 25 considered evaluable for response) • ORR (> PR): 52% w/ 24% VGPR • MR 24% • PFS: 6.1 mo Lentzsch et al. Blood 2012
Retreatment w/ IMiD compounds for MM Patients Retrospective study in 140 pts treated firstline w/ THAL/DEX- 58% LEN/DEX- 42% Retreatment w/ a regimen containing THAL- 24% LEN- 76% # of treatments before retreatment - median of 2 (range 1-6) 89% received IMiD compound w/ DEX 113 considered evaluable for response 44% > PR MR not reported Madan et al. Blood 2011
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma For patients failing CYBORD regimens upfront, treatment options include all of the following except PLD w/ BOR +/- steroids Bendamustine w/ BOR Len w/ steroids Len w/ steroids + BOR Len w/ oral melphalan