230 likes | 387 Views
HVS N12 test feedback RPF - 12 May 2005. N12 tests. Suite of tests on Emulsion treated material on Section 2, N12 (old S12 sections) Includes LTPP, laboratory, field, HVS Objectives: Collect current condition data (LTPP) Determine ultimate failure mechanism and traffic load
E N D
N12 tests • Suite of tests on Emulsion treated material on Section 2, N12 (old S12 sections) • Includes LTPP, laboratory, field, HVS • Objectives: • Collect current condition data (LTPP) • Determine ultimate failure mechanism and traffic load • Calibrate SAMDM with long-term performance data
Constructed in 1968 as CTB Premature failure Reconstructed in 1974 as ETB (1% res bitumen)
Trafficking details • Final repetitions (29/4/2005) • 1 399 861 (22k 40 kN; 243k 80 kN; 1 134k 100 kN) • Initial traffic on sections • > 11.5 million E80s • Final HVS traffic (n=2; 4) • 8 MESA (70% of initial) • 48 MESA (420 % of initial) • Final total • 19.5 MESA (total of approximately 50 years) • 59.5 MESA (total of >> 50 years)
Test Data • Permanent deformation • Very small • Elastic deflection • initial increase • small increasing trend • strong support (700 MPa) • Stiffness • Strong support • Others • surfacing lasted well
Permanent Deformation (1) Water added Load increases
Permanent Deformation (2) Load increases MDD failure after 950 000 reps due to water
Permanent Deformation (3) Water added Load increases
Elastic Deflection - RSD Load increases Water added
Elastic Deflection – MDD Load increases MDD failure after 950 000 reps due to water
Stiffness – Subbase (CTB) 1970 value = 1 650 MPa
Stiffness – Upper subgrade (350 mm to 660 mm) 1970 value = 700 to 1 000 MPa
Stiffness – Middle subgrade (660 mm to 900 mm) 1970 value = 700 to 900 MPa
Stiffness – Lower subgrade(900 mm and deeper) 1970 value = 700 to 900 MPa
Permeability CTB and BTB surfacings ETB surfacing and patch
Permeability ETB Base
Water phase • Water on surface caused stripping • Final phase of test with water added • Final condition – surfacing deteriorated • No failure in base
Current conclusions • Good performance under a very high traffic load • Information will be used to calibrate the higher trafficked end of the SAMDM transfer functions for ETB pavements • No dramatic failures except when under high load wet test and mechanical damage • Potential benefits • Calibration data for ETB designs • Confirmation of deep structure / perpetual pavement concept