70 likes | 180 Views
Criteria D & E. Knowledge of Subject and Reasoned Argument. “Demonstrates a very good knowledge and understanding of topic studied”. You have consulted a variety of sources and are able to articulate the relationships between your sources ; you tell me what it means NOT what it says
E N D
Criteria D & E Knowledge of Subject and Reasoned Argument
“Demonstrates a very good knowledge and understanding of topic studied” You have consulted a variety of sources and are able to articulate the relationships between your sources; you tell me what it means NOT what it says Role of the Vive Voce – are you able to answer questions about your conclusion and research or are you merely “parroting” back your paper? You cannot fabricate knowledge acquisition or the research process Knowledge of Subject (D) – How do I show that I know what I am talking about?
“the essay clearly and precisely locates the investigation in an academic context” Can be defined as “the current state of the field of study under investigation” The scope of your investigation needs to address the CURRENT state of study; WHAT is the current state of study in your topic? You need to have current sources. The currency of the research/writing speaks to its importance; if there hasn’t been anything written for 100 years, is it worthy of investigation? Knowledge of Subject (D) – How do I “locate” the topic in an “academic context”?
“Ideas are presented clearly and in a logical and coherent manner” “Develops a reasoned and convincing argument in relation to the research question” Be consistent and organized – creating a plan or outline will help you with this Know the TYPE of argument you are making and how it relates to your subject Reasoned Argument (E) – How do I organize all of my research?
Types of Argument Organization Comparative – Focus on elements that are similar (or different) make sure that the elements in your comparison are consistent from source to source. (example: world lit paper) Cause and Effect – Focuses on the causal relationships between things - avoid logical fallacies (example: Mike Jordan would be a great middle school gym coach)
Types of Arguments (Cont.) Point/Counterpoint – Use one source to establish an “answer” and then use an opposing source to explore the other side. Patterns/Threads – You notice that all of the research in your topic is organized by certain elements; this becomes the structure of your essay
Types of Arguments (cont.) Juxtaposing an Anchor Source – there is one major source or document (it may be a primary source) in your topic and you use other sources’ discussions of it to reach a conclusion Scientific – Follows the scientific method; reveals the thesis in the conclusion (versus intro)