1 / 27

Worklife Balance and Organizational Commitment of Generation Y Employees

Worklife Balance and Organizational Commitment of Generation Y Employees. Evangelista, Marianne Joyce M. Lim, Eric Darryl N. Rocafor, Shirley C. Teh, Germaine Larisse Y. Introduction. Generation Y (born: 1980-2000)

azize
Download Presentation

Worklife Balance and Organizational Commitment of Generation Y Employees

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Worklife Balance and Organizational Commitment of Generation Y Employees Evangelista, Marianne Joyce M. Lim, Eric Darryl N. Rocafor, Shirley C. Teh, Germaine Larisse Y.

  2. Introduction

  3. Generation Y (born: 1980-2000) • ▫ period when the internet, instant messaging, other technology and hip hop are prevalent (Young, 2007) • Silent Generation (born: 1922-1945) • witnessed World War II, the Great Depression, the Cold War, the bombing of Pearl Harbor (Young, 2007) • Baby Boomer (born: 1946-1964) • born in the midst of events such as civil rights movements, the introduction of the birth control pill, rock and roll (Young, 2007) • Generation X (born: 1965-1979) • fall of Berlin, and introduction of punk rock, rap and the personal computer (Young 2007)

  4. Characteristics of Generation Y • New and distinct ideas, behavior, & characteristics (i.e. Self-entitlement) • More loyal to their careers than to the organization • Best qualities: hunger for constant learning & self-development • Values worklifebalance more as compared to the other generations

  5. Does worklife balance affect the organizational commitment of Generation Y employees in the selected IT firm in Metro Manila?

  6. Worklife Balance- balance between work and family or life outside work (Yeandle, 2005; Millward, 2005). Fisher-McAuley, et al. (2003) described worklife balance as a competition for both time and energy between the different roles filled by an individual. It may be considered unbalanced for an individual when the amount of time causes some sort of conflict or stress in other areas of life. • Organizational Commitment- the employee’s behavior intention to continually work for the organization rather than accepting another job that may offer potentially better socioeconomic benefits (Sheridan & Abelson, 1983).

  7. In a few years, Generation Y will be dominating the workforce! • The actual situation / status of WLB and OC of Generation Y in the Philippine Setting • If there is a difference between the statuses between Generation X and Y • Reasons and potential solutions

  8. Generation X and Y

  9. Generation X and Y

  10. Quantitative Analysis • Survey Questionnaires • 3 component model of organizational commitment questionnaire, revised by Lee, Allen and Meyer (2001) • Worklife balance scale - “Psychometric Assesment of an Instrument Designed to Measure WorkLife Balance” Hayman (2005). • Qualitative Data Analysis • Interview Guide

  11. Respondents • Survey: • all 94 employees of the selected IT firm • Interview: • HR • 10 employees (5 Gen Y, 5 GenX)

  12. Gen X and Y – WLB balance Worklife Balance is significant on Organizational Commitment for both Generation X and Y (p=0.033141) • Moderate positive correlation between Worklife Balance and Organizational Commitment at cc=0.30 • Gen X – closer to significant level 0.05 (p = 0.091053) • Gen Y - Worklife Balance did not have a significant difference on Organizational Commitment for Generation Y at (p = 0.458313) *p-value significant at p<0.05

  13. Generation Y • WLB: • Both Saturday & overtime work are tiresome but does not affect their worklife balance • OC: • Most respondents are open to the idea of looking for better job opportunities outside of the company

  14. Generation X • WLB: • Company interventions on worklife balance are considered sufficient and just “okay” • OC: • Majority are loyal to the company and has no immediate intentions or plans to leave

  15. Worklife interference with personal life (WIPL) • Similarities • Overtime is necessary (Cramption & Hodge, 2009) • Differences: • Differences in reasons for overtime work (Alexander & James 2009) • Privilege of flexibility in work hours/schedule (X) • Trainings perceived differently (Cubic Consulting, 2008)

  16. Personal life interference with work (PLIW) • Similarities : • Value importance of personal life • Struggle to balance work and life considering 6-day work week • Appreciate Christmas party and outings

  17. Personal life interference with work (PLIW) • Differences : • The definition of personal life: time with family (X) vs. social life (Y) • effect of Saturdays to personal lives (Y) • request for flexible schedules (Y) (Lower & Schwarz, 2008) • proximity to residence (X)

  18. Work/Personal life enhancement (WPLE) • Similarities: • happy with office environment and relationship with management • Differences: • expectations on job function: challenging and personal growth (Y) vs. accustomed to/comfort (X) (Grillo, 2009)

  19. Continuance Commitment (cost of leaving too high) • Similarities : • reasons: economy, the work opportunity available, and the precise uncertainty that comes with the new job (Terjesen, Vinnicombe, and Freeman, 2007) • Opportunity to get a higher salary • Differences : • proximity of the workplace to their homes (X) • perceptions on availability of career advancement

  20. Normative Commitment (obligation to stay-moral imperatives) • Similarities: • claim that they loyal to the company: provides them work and compensation • Differences: • “utangnaloob” - referrals (X) • Seize opportunities for career advancement (Y) (D'Amato & Herzfeldt, 2008)

  21. Affective Commitment (employee’s attachment, involvement in, and identification with their employers) • Similarities: • reason for loyalty: emotional attachment to bosses & co-employees and the good work environment • Differences: • “utangnaloob” to their employers – the company as a whole (X)

  22. Making the connection: WLB effects on OC • Gen Y • WLB do not have a significant effect on OC • Characteristics of Generation Y • Desire to be independent • Techno-savvy • Impatient/ Sense of Immediacy • Demand for responsibility • Flexibility of work • Clearer expectations based on previous job experience • Career planning • Self-entitlement

  23. Making the connection: WLB effects on OC • Gen X – closer to significant level • WLB not significant on OC BUT is closer • Characteristics of Generation X • Skeptical • Self- reliant • Loyal • Attracted by promises of climbing ladders, paying dues, and cashing out at retirement

  24. Making the connection: WLB effects on OC • Gen X and Y – WLB balance Worklife Balance is significant on Organizational Commitment for both Generation X and Y Other variables might have pulled up the scores

  25. Conclusion • Generation Y employees do not consider worklife balance as a necessary factor to stay in a company • Generation Y sees worklife balance as a given state or basic job consideration that must be already present

  26. Recommendations • Looking into the company culture as a possible variable • Study or compare to same or another industry or size of the company • Compare to another multinational or local company • May also look into family businesses • Comparing different departments (subcultures) • Repackage compensation schemes

  27. Thank You!

More Related