1 / 7

CPUC Directives on DEER, Non-DEER Workpapers, and the Ex Ante Review Process

CPUC Directives on DEER, Non-DEER Workpapers, and the Ex Ante Review Process. Alejandra Mejia may, 2014. Objective. Is Cal TF design/proposed implementation consistent with CPUC directives on ex ante value and non-DEER workpaper development?. Approach.

azizi
Download Presentation

CPUC Directives on DEER, Non-DEER Workpapers, and the Ex Ante Review Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CPUC Directives on DEER, Non-DEER Workpapers, and the Ex Ante Review Process Alejandra Mejia may, 2014 CPUC Directives on DEER and Ex Ante Process

  2. Objective Is Cal TF design/proposed implementation consistent with CPUC directives on ex ante value and non-DEER workpaper development? CPUC Directives on DEER and Ex Ante Process

  3. Approach • Reviewed CPUC Orders, Assigned Commissioner and ALJ Rulings (over 20) • Reviewed DEER History • DEER Administration, Stakeholder Involvement, funding CPUC Directives on DEER and Ex Ante Process

  4. History of DEER • In 1990, CEC organized the California Conservation Inventory Group to identify types of data to be collected and methodologies to be used • Participation by CEC, CPUC, ORA, IOUs, NRDC, LBNL, California Institute for Energy Efficiency • CADMAC took over DEER maintenance and updates, later CBEE and CPUC handed it off to Calmac • DEER needs to be supported by a collaborative of experts because “decisions on DEER values were often extremely challenging due to significant technical complexities and empirical uncertainties” Report by Itron, Hirsh & Associates, 2005 • D.05-01-011 began transition of DEER management to Energy Division CPUC Directives on DEER and Ex Ante Process

  5. Consistent CPUC Policy Directives on Ex Ante Values and Non-DEER WP • Collaborative • Transparent • Well-Documented, Easily Available • Best Available Data • Strikes Reasonable Balance Between Accuracy, Precision, and Timeliness; Cost and Certainty • Minimizes Ex Post Risk CPUC Directives on DEER and Ex Ante Process

  6. CPUC Ex Ante Policy Directives Alignment: Cal TF • Collaborative • By Design • Transparent • By Design: public TF meetings; all information on website. • Well-Documented, Easily Available • All values will be documented in consistent templates; values to be linked to underlying data on web and in WP templates. • Best Available Data • Broader range of experts will weigh in; increases likelihood of “Best Available Data” • Strikes Reasonable Balance Between Accuracy, Precision and Timeliness; Cost and Certainty • TBD • Minimizes Ex Post Risk • TBD CPUC Directives on DEER and Ex Ante Process

  7. Cal TF Can Also Help Restore the CPUC’s Separation of Functions “The Public Utilities Commission is a regulatory agency, not an administrative agency. As such, the Commission’s regulatory functions, and the Commission’s responsibility for providing independent oversight of all ratepayer-funded programs, are incompatible with administration of any of those programs or contracts on a long-term basis.” D.05-01-055 CPUC Directives on DEER and Ex Ante Process

More Related