1 / 18

Assessing Student Learning in EPICS

Assessing Student Learning in EPICS. Assessing Student Learning: Outline. What to assess Learning objectives and expectations Artifacts – data to assess Grading Sr. Design Example. What to Assess. Students are given academic credit for mastering course content,

azura
Download Presentation

Assessing Student Learning in EPICS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessing Student Learning in EPICS

  2. Assessing Student Learning: Outline • What to assess • Learning objectives and expectations • Artifacts – data to assess • Grading • Sr. Design Example

  3. What to Assess • Students are given academic credit for mastering course content, • Not for the service they provide for the community • Students are therefore assessed on their demonstrated mastery of course content

  4. Defining Learning Objectives • Started with ECE Senior Design: A student who successfully fulfills the course will demonstrate: • an ability to apply technical material from their discipline to the design of engineering products; • an understanding of design as a start-to-finish process; • an ability to identify and acquire new knowledge as a part of the problem-solving/design process; • an awareness of the customer in engineering design; • an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams and an appreciation for the contributions from individuals from other disciplines; • an ability to communicate effectively with both technical and non-technical audiences ; • demonstrates an awareness of engineering ethics and professional responsibility; • an appreciation of the role that engineering can play in social contexts . • Common set of outcomes across disciplines • Engineering  your discipline

  5. Multidisciplinary Assessments • EPICS often requires multidisciplinary approaches • Assessing students from different areas requires their own learning objectives in their “own language” • Freshman vs senior • One vs two credits • Engineer vs Liberal Arts • Important to be specific about expectations and outcomes

  6. Evaluation Rubric

  7. Setting Expectations • Teams set goals for the semester through a project plan • Faculty advisor approves plan • Students set individual personal goals for each semester • Goals in week 4, updates weeks 8 and 12 • Faculty advisor approves goals • Self assessments weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16

  8. Artifacts: Data to Assess • Students produce artifacts that can be assessed during their EPICS experience • Design Notebooks • Reflections • Self-assessments • Presentations • Reports • Project documentation • Delivered projects • Manuals or other documentations with project

  9. Design Notebooks & Documentation • Build a record (portfolio) of an individual’s work • Document individual progress • Capture reflection/metacognitive activities • Academic and service experience • Guidelines provided and evaluate during the semester • % of points on format and content • Discipline useful for later as professionals • Project documentation • Documents successes and achievements • Digital archive for projects

  10. Assessing Team and Individual Work • Teams are assessed • Project plan • Customer/Partner feedback • Presentations and team reports • Individual artifacts assessed • Peer assessments • Summary of accomplishments • Individual Notebooks • Reflections • Design records - authored • Observations

  11. “Dry Run” Grading = Calibration • Midsemester grading is a “dry run” • If the semester were to end today, you would receive a _____ • All resources and artifacts evaluated • Self assessments evaluated • Students provided with a team and individual grade or range and comments • What would they have to do to improve? • Calibrates students and faculty • Problems can be identified early • Need for documentation reinforced

  12. Final Grading • Repeat process for dry run grades • Final self-assessment • Students receive comments and their grades • Use dry run evaluations as a basis • Students addressed concerns over the last half of the semester? • Emphasis on documentation • Do the artifacts represent their level of work?

  13. ABET, Sr. Design and EPICS • EPICS projects are well-matched to the ABET criteria. • Customer-driven service learning means that each team has a different project and that each student may have a different role on the team. • This variability requires procedures for assessment, tracking, and documentation of projects and of student outcomes.

  14. Senior Design and EPICS • Sr. Design option for • ECE, IDE and CS students • Two semesters of EPICS • Outcomes matrix • Demonstrate each has been met • Approvals, TA, Advisor, EPICS • Project Description • Approvals, Advisor, EPICS, ECE • Documents saved on Sharepoint Server (revision control)

  15. EPICS and ABET • Fulfills capstone design requirement for Purdue BSEE, BSCmpE and BSIDE degrees • 3 credits over 2 senior semesters • 8 outcomes related to the ProgramObjectives & Outcomes • 2 approval processes: • Significant design experience on a suitable project • Satisfaction of course outcomes by each student: “A student who successfully fulfills the course requirements associated with at least 3 credits of EPICS taken over 2 or more semesters will …”

  16. Project Approval • Project Description Form: • Team & project name • Project members, majors, expertise • Project & customer summary • How builds on earlier ECE courses • New technical knowledge acquired • Multidisciplinary nature • How project involves professionalcomponent (criterion 4) constraints • One form per project w/ seniordesign students per semester • Reviewed/approved by team advisor, EPICS administrators, ECE Senior Design committee

  17. Outcomes Certification Documenting Outcomes: • Deliverables • Design notebook • Design reviews • Reports • Presentations • Weekly reports • Customer feedback • Peer evaluation • Self assessment

  18. Outcomes Certification • Outcomes record maintained by students • Reviewed twice per semester by TAs and team advisor: incremental approval • Semester-end and year-end review byEPICS administration • Reviews: • Approval ofoutcomes anddocumentation • Redirect student’sefforts

More Related