510 likes | 658 Views
eAssessment innovations in HSC. Ali Wyllie, Ingrid Nix, Verina Waights, Mick Jones, Caroline Malone COLMSCT CETL Teaching Fellows, HSC F aculty briefing 24th February 2010. Outline. Emerging eAssessment practice: CETL research projects emerging from Faculty programmes
E N D
eAssessment innovations in HSC Ali Wyllie, Ingrid Nix, Verina Waights, Mick Jones, Caroline Malone COLMSCT CETL Teaching Fellows, HSC Faculty briefing 24th February 2010
Outline Emerging eAssessment practice: • CETL research projects emerging from Faculty programmes • Innovation in learning design in LINA and CDM projects Highlighting innovation in Faculty programmes: • K101 • Social Work • Nursing Looking to the future: • Evaluation • Where do we go from here
Emerging eAssessment practice Course production & assessment • Social work – ECDL equivalent • Pre-Registration Nursing Programme (PRNP) – Anatomy, physiology and medication calculations Innovation in learning design: Engaging students interest, relating Qs to practice, offering choice. CETL research projects: • LINA (Learning with Interactive Assessment) • CDM (Clinical Decision-Making)
LINA: Extended narratives in a practice context • Review ICT skills • Choice of questions within sequences • Narrative within sequences: e.g. Sue and Claire discuss how to create a Care Plan or find a document (audios) • Contextualised by variety of rich media: audios, animations, images, tables, texts • Confidence-indicator tool promotes reflection • Learning log captures progress and reflective comments http://learn.open.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=4348
Learning Design Features: LINA • Choice in question sequences • Narrative within sequences • Variety of media: audios, animations, images, tables, texts • Tools to promote reflection: Learning log, Confidence indicator tool • Progressive feedback at each of 3 attempts.
Complex decision-making • Context: Student nurses develop practice-based clinical decision-making (CDM) strategies • Narrative case study of wound care - ulcer • Contextualised by rich media: audios, images, charts, texts • Reflective log to capture decisions, reasoning and reflections • Multiple level options with alternative final outcomes create intelligent tutoring maze evolving over time • 2 possible attempts with scoring and detailed feedback at end http://learn.open.ac.uk/mod/resourcepage/view.php?id=79337&superfluous=357
Learning Design Features: CDM • Experiential learning with student options scaffolded • Choice in decisions • Case study narrative • Variety of media: audios, animations, images, tables, texts • Tools to promote reflection: Reflective log, score, visual narrative • Detailed feedback at final attempt.
Highlighting innovation in Faculty programmes: K101 • Ingrid: K101 and Social Work
Developing number skills on K101 ‘learning a way of talking about the world in numerical terms’ ‘The purpose of each quiz – to get your mind tuned in, so that you are ready to listen to the way tables & charts are talked about and the way conclusions are drawn from them.’ (K101 course text, Bl1, Unit 4 Activity 3)
Formative – DVD-ROM activity Context links to quiz link to quiz
Formative – DVD-ROM activity Correct answer triggers feedback (audio + animations explaining the answer)
Audio Feedback: ‘…What do the numbers on the left tell you? They go up in twenties and the red line …’ Play demo Animation enhances explanation
Social work degree rationale • Increase assessment points to cover curriculum areas • Needed esp. for ICT skills due to ECDL requirements • Avoid need for tutor marking • enabling AL focus on other areas of teaching • Self-directed learning (diagnostic self-assessment) • useful where find variations in skills/ knowledge levels so students can catch up at own speed
Programme-wide development K113 K216 K315
Identifying information • Level One – Social work (K113)
Interpreting information • Level One – Social work (K113)
Matching or labelling… • Level One – Social work (K113)
Sequences: constructing a reference • Level Two – Social work (K216)
Entering text information: reference details • Level Two – Social work (K216)
Entering information – numeric (spreadsheet formula) • Level Two – Social work (K216)
Recognising and identifying principles • Identify which principles apply to which sections (i, ii, iii, iv) of the scenario … • …relating to the experience of Sheri, a newly qualified social worker. • Level 3 – Social Work (K315)
Highlighting innovation in Faculty programmes: Nursing • Verina : Pre-Registration Nursing Programme
Evaluation • Are the students engaging? • Does e-Assessment work?
Are students engaging? • HOW DO WE KNOW? • Gradebook – to tell us about the student experience/ actions • CTs decide who to make it available to: • Students (individual view) • Tutors (tutor group view + cohort averages) • CTs (course wide view of TGs + cohort averages + sort functions to display information + generate reports)
Gradebook: for students • Benefits: • Enables students to review their use of iCMAs • e.g. Answers, marks, times, dates
Gradebook: for tutors Lack of score shows student needs chasing for next iCMA Average across 3 iCMAs After cut-off a score shows student has submitted Compare TG average with cohort average
Gradebook: further information • VLE choices website (co-ordinated by Janet Macdonald) • http://learn.open.ac.uk/site/vle-choices • Teaching and facilitation > Section 3.3 Feedback on learning • Fiona Barnes on K101 AL use (PDF) • Ingrid Nix on CT considerations (Audio )
Course perspective • The CT will be involved: • At score approval stage • At end of presentation(s)
Course perspective • K101 09B • - iCMA grades distributed across iCMA42 • - How well each question helped sort strong students from weak
Cohort averages viewed in Gradebook K101 09B K101 08J
Student patterns of engagement • Sally Jordan (Science Faculty) analysis of student engagement: • - last minute activity just before cut off (S104) - does easy questions first, returns several times to do other Qs (S104). - completes when directed by course units after each chapter (S154)
Browsing versus engaging • Sally Jordan (Science Faculty) analysis of student engagement: • Student responses to the same question • Grey = blank responses; green = correct =;red = incorrect. • Where the same colour is shown at 1st/2nd/3rd attempt, an identical student response has been entered. • diagnostic formative summative
Looking to the future • Mick Jones and Caroline Malone
Cost and time • Our experience with time-consuming and expensive production and maintenance of iCMAs has put us off, however: • - they have worked well with students • processes and guidance has improved significantly (led by HSC!) • - there are now exemplars and 'templates' to follow • - academic expertise is growing.
Course design • With the current course design imperatives iCMAs and online quizzes should have a place in SOME courses and programmes as: • - part of online activity sequences • - increased online interactivity • - need to increase formative assessment and effective scaffolding of learning • - opportunity to gather rapid feedback.
Process improvement • We need to continue with process improvement, design guidelines and staff development: • - the power lies in increased interaction and more frequent feedback • - relatively simple approaches can work well • - avoid unnecessary complexity • - but they do need higher standards of precision and care than most learning materials.
Other approaches • Some approaches we haven't really tried yet: • - commissioning ALs, expert staff or appropriate consultants to produce • - ALs build up a question bank over time • - collaborate with other institutions • - use externally produced questions from publishers/commercial companies.
To find out more • Learning about eAssessment (Phil Butcher) • http://learn.open.ac.uk/course/view.php?name=ICMA • E-Assessment section of Media Development wiki • http://intranet4.open.ac.uk/wikis/MDWG-wiki/EAssessment • VLE Choices website • http://learn.open.ac.uk/site/vle-choices