1 / 15

4th Conference of African Ministers of Integration, 4-8 May 2009

4th Conference of African Ministers of Integration, 4-8 May 2009. The European integration experience. Overview. A definition of integration Historical highlights Integration in Europe Institutions Competences Compliance Predictable and sustainable financing Involvement of citizens

badru
Download Presentation

4th Conference of African Ministers of Integration, 4-8 May 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 4th Conference of African Ministers of Integration, 4-8 May 2009 The European integration experience .

  2. Overview • A definition of integration • Historical highlights • Integration in Europe • Institutions • Competences • Compliance • Predictable and sustainablefinancing • Involvement of citizens • EU integration over time – generalobservations

  3. A definition of integration • The process whereby sovereign states relinquish (surrender or pool) national sovereignty to maximize their collective power and interest

  4. Historical highlights • 1951: European Coal and StealCommunity(6) • 1957: European EconomicCommunity, Free TradeArea(6) • 1968: CustomsUnion (6) • 1985: SchengenAgreement (5), now 15, includingnon-EU • 1992: InternalMarket(12) • 1993: European Union enters intoforce • 1997: CFSP/ESDP: European CommonForeign and SecurityPolicy, European Security and DefensePolicy (15) • 1998: European Central Bank launched • 1999: Economic and Monetary Union (11) • 2002: Single currency (16) • 2007: 27 membersstates

  5. European Institutions and actors • EU Member States • European Commission • European Parliament • European Court of Justice • European Central Bank • Court of Auditors • Economic and SocialCouncil • Committee of the Regions and LocalAuthorities (Committee of RECsforAfrica?)

  6. Competences • EU exclusivecompetences: externaltrade in goods and some services, monetarypolicy (in Eurozone) customs, and fisheries. Commission right of initiative. Not the memberstates • EU sharedcompetences(in majority of policycompetences of the EU): environmentalpolicy, consumerprotection, developmentaid, transport policy, visa, assylum, and migration, etc. • Member states competences: most foreign and securitypolicies, education, culture, employment, public health, social and urbanpolicy, etc. (principle of subsidiarity)

  7. The European Pillars (1), Nice 2001 • Pillar 1: European Community • Policy responsibilities: internal market (incl competition and external trade), agriculture, economic and monetary Union, immigration, assylum, visas. • Decision-making: supranational: the EU’s common institutions (Commission, Council, Court, and Parliament) can act largely (never entirely) independently of national governments

  8. European Pillars (2) • Pillar 2: Common Foreign and Security Policy • Policy responsibilities: common action to strengthen security of EU: preserve peace; promote international cooperation. • Decision-making: primarily intergovernmental (that is, between governments); neither the European Parliament nor the Court of Justice have much direct influence

  9. European Pillars (3) • Pillar 3: Justics and Home Affairs: police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters. • Policy responsibilities: Cross-border crime; criminal law; police cooperation • Decision-making style: common action is loose and the unanimity of all 27 member states is required for virtually all important decisions.

  10. Compliance - Legal • EuropeanCommission. Act as a guardian of treates, ensurescorrect application of the law) • European Court of Justice(27 judges + court of firstinstance). Finalarbiter in disputesbetween EU institutions, and between EU institutions and member states, citizenscanseekpreliminary ruling) • European Court of Auditors (27 auditors). Financial conscience of the EU

  11. Compliance - Political • Monthly Council meetings. Not only ministers of foreign affairs, but all ministers (agriculture, health, education, finance, environment, etc.). Creates ownership • Regular scorecards: peer pressure

  12. Compliance - Financial • European Central Bank • Formulating the EU’smonetarypolicy, includingensuringmonetarystability, setting interest rates, and issueing and managing the euro (onlyfor euro zone countries) • Executive board (primarilynationalcentral bank governors) appointedbymemberstates, reports to the EuropeanParliament • Strongly independent. President is chosenbymemberstatesbutcannotbeformallyremovedbythem

  13. Financing the Union • EU budget revenu (customs duties, value added tax, and national contributions) • EU budget allocation • Yearly budget • Financial perspectives (covering seven-year patterns of spending: sustainability and predictability)

  14. Involvement of Citizens • European Parliament (795 members, directlyelectedsince 1979) • European integration process has mostly been anelitistprocess. • Direct involvement of citizenshardlyrealized • Information and communication to citizens: mixed results • Needforvisibleresults: cohesionfunds • Citizenstake Europe oftenforgranted (welfare, no more war) butquestionnationalpoliticians’ ability to ensuretheirinterests in ‘Brussels’

  15. European integration over time, somegeneralobservations • Strong regional integration requiressolid, functioning, and accountablenationalstructures • The politicalinterests of memberstatesdefinehowitengageswithin the EU. • Changeis a constant: an ‘experiment in motion’, anongoingprocess without a clear end state • A system of shared power characterizedbygrowingcomplexity and anincreasing number of players • Anorganizationwithanexpanded scope, butlimitedcapacity (tensionbetweenwidening and deepening, betweenambitions and institutional and politicalcapacity)

More Related