Planning Inclusion of Clients through e-Training PICT

1. Planning Inclusion of Clients through e-TrainingPICT Linda Wright Liverpool John Moores University

2. review research / theory of public involvement literature review influences on thinking European level trans sectoral review policy and practice review policy and methods identify problems identify best practice WP3 : Objectives

3. Outcomes • report • printed • electronic format • PICT web site summary • best practice data base • comparison and evaluation • countries • legal policy frameworks • input to Good Practice Guide

4. Literature review JMU lead co operating partners local search Report on Policy and Practice Case Studies Partners ECTP Call for best practice information PICT website partner countries ECTP non partner Euro countries Personal interviews survey form JMU interviews co operating partners WP3 : Methodology & Responsibility

5. rationale ensure consistency of approach facilitate comparative analysis complementary to survey forms aims to agree format model responsibilities timescale Proposal : National Report

6. National Reports : Suggested Format • Sections • Operational framework of planning function • Local literature review • Participation : national perspective • IT : national perspective • Case study information

7. operational framework statutory / legislative framework national, regional, local relationships responsibilities controls, sanctions professional body influence good practice development accountability to citizens local literature review major influences on planning thinking and practice particular reference to participation IT National Reports : Sections

8. participation statutory requirements or recommendations controls, sanctions strategy or targets at each level good practice examples comparison planning and other sectors IT statutory requirements or recommendations controls, sanctions strategy or targets at each level good practice examples omparison planning and other sectors National Reports : Sections

9. Case study aims and objectives methodology, rationale process results evaluation to what extent successful lessons learned future influence National Reports : Sections

10. Citizen control 8 Degrees of citizen power Delegated power 7 Partnership 6 Placation 5 Degrees of tokenism Consultation 4 Informing 3 Therapy 2 Non-participation Manipulation 1 Arnstein’s Ladder of Participation 1969

11. Information Disclosuretold what has been decided / happened. Public Consultation problems externally defined, information processes/analysis controlled. No obligation to take account of views. Functional Participationparticipationencouraged as means to achieve project goals, reduce costs and comply with procedural requirements. Interactive Participationparticipation in partnership with external agencies, from early strategic stages of project design and throughout implementation. Self-mobilisationparticipate by taking initiatives independent of external agencies. Governments, NGOs or private companies often providing enabling framework. Pretty 1995 Pretty (1995) Typology of Participation

12. National Reports : Format • Sections • Operational framework of planning function • Local literature review • Participation : national perspective • IT : national perspective • Case study information

13. Suggested Timescale

14. Planners questionnaires Personal interviews survey form JMU interviews co operating partners Call for best practice information PICT website partner countries ECTP non partner Euro countries Outstanding issues

17. Literature review JMU lead co operating partners local search Report on Policy and Practice Case Studies Partners ECTP Call for best practice information PICT website partner countries ECTP non partner Euro countries Personal interviews survey form JMU interviews co operating partners WP3 : Methodology & Responsibility