1 / 20

Heliospheric MHD Modeling of the May 12, 1997 Event

Heliospheric MHD Modeling of the May 12, 1997 Event. Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/Space Environment Center. MURI Meeting, UCB/SSL, Berkeley, CA, March 1-3, 2004. Collaborators. Nick Arge – AFRL, Hanscom, MA Chris Hood – University of Colorado, Boulder, CO

baina
Download Presentation

Heliospheric MHD Modeling of the May 12, 1997 Event

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Heliospheric MHD Modeling of the May 12, 1997 Event Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/Space Environment Center MURI Meeting, UCB/SSL, Berkeley, CA, March 1-3, 2004

  2. Collaborators • Nick Arge – AFRL, Hanscom, MA • Chris Hood – University of Colorado, Boulder, CO • Rob Markel – University of Colorado, Boulder, CO • Leslie Mayer – University of Colorado, Boulder, CO • Vic Pizzo – NOAA/SEC, Boulder, CO • Pete Riley – SAIC, San Diego, CA • Marek Vandas – Astronomical Institute, Prague, Czech Republic • Xuepu Zhao – Stanford University, Standford, CA

  3. Ambient Solar Wind Models CU/CIRES-NOAA/SEC 3-D solar wind model based on potential and current-sheet source surface empirical models SAIC 3-D MHD steady state coronal model based on photospheric field maps [ SAIC maps – Pete Riley ] [ WSA maps – Nick Arge ]

  4. CME Cone Model Best fitting for May 12, 1997 halo CME • latitude: N3.0 • longitude: W1.0 • angular width: 50 deg • velocity:650 km/s at 24 Rs (14:15 UT) • acceleration: 18.5 m/s2 [ Zhao et al., 2001 ]

  5. Boundary Conditions Ambient Solar Wind + Plasma Cloud Ambient Solar Wind

  6. Latitudinal Distortion of ICME Shape ICME propagates into bi-modal solar wind

  7. Evolution of Density Structure ICME propagates into the enhanced density of a streamer belt flow

  8. Synthetic White-Light Imaging

  9. Interplanetary Disturbances

  10. Evolution of Parameters at Earth

  11. May 12, 1997 – Interplanetary Shock Distribution of parameters in equatorial plane Evolution of velocity on Sun-Earth line 0.2 AU 0.4 AU 0.6 AU 0.8 AU • Shock propagates in a fast stream and • merges with its leading edge 1.0 AU

  12. Case A1 Case A3 [ SAIC maps -- Pete Riley ] Fast-Stream Position Ambient state before the CME launch Disturbed state during the CME launch Ambient state after the CME launch

  13. [ SAIC maps -- Pete Riley ] Effect of Fast-Stream Position Case A1 Case A3 Earth : Interaction region followed by shock and CME (not observed) Earth : Shock and CME (observed but 3-day shift is too large)

  14. Streamer-Belt Disruption?

  15. Case A2 Case B2 [ SAIC maps -- Pete Riley ] Fast-Stream Evolution Ambient state before the CME launch Disturbed state during the CME launch Ambient state after the CME launch

  16. [ SAIC maps -- Pete Riley ] Effect of Fast-Stream Evolution Case A2 Case B2 Earth : Interaction region followed by shock and CME (not observed) Earth : Shock and CME (observed but shock front is radial)

  17. Case A2 Case B2 [ WSA maps -- Nick Arge ] Fast-Stream Evolution Ambient state before the CME launch Disturbed state during the CME launch Ambient state after the CME launch

  18. [ WSA maps – Nick Arge ] Effect of Fast-Stream Evolution Case A2 Case B2 Earth : Interaction region followed by shock and CME (not observed) Earth : Shock and CME (observed but shock front is radial)

  19. [ WSA maps – Nick Arge ] Daily-Updated Synoptic Maps Evolving velocity structure at 21.5 Rs due to changes in photospheric field

  20. [ 3D force-free model – Marek Vandas ] Magnetic Flux Rope Toroidal structure emerges into computational domain

More Related