1 / 24

Human factors issues

Human factors issues. A discussion on selected topics Rob Methorst September 27, 2007. Outline. Introduction Systems approach to Vulnerable Road Users Safety Culture in Hazardous Goods Transport Sustainable Road Safety – an update. Systems approach to Vulnerable Road Users.

baina
Download Presentation

Human factors issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Human factors issues A discussion on selected topics Rob Methorst September 27, 2007

  2. Outline • Introduction • Systems approach to Vulnerable Road Users • Safety Culture in Hazardous Goods Transport • Sustainable Road Safety – an update

  3. Systems approach to Vulnerable Road Users • Issue and reason • VRU accidents do not follow trends • Neglected issue in research • Ageing of the population: expected mobility restraints and higher risks • Hidden single accidents (~70% of VRU victims (= 40% of all travel victims ER+)) • Activities: • 2003 report Vulnerable Road Users • policy development Vulnerable Road Users, particularly re. bicyclist • COST 358 Pedestrians’ Quality Needs • Focus on mobility needs, including safety • 6 Main elements

  4. Vulnerable Road Users – Pizza model

  5. Vulnerable Road Users - TRIPOD The developers’ (Prof. Wagenaar) dog had only 3 legs and was called ‘Driepoot’(English = Tripod)

  6. Vulnerable Road Users - perspectives • Functional perspective: usage value, what is being offered = intrinsic quality supply, looking at the system from the ‘head’ 2. Perception perspective: what is being requested = subjective quality demand, looking at the system from the ‘heart’, including attitudes towards and of pedestrians. 3. Durability and Future Prospects: whilst # 1 and # 2 are static quality descriptions, # 3 refers to a dynamic perspective. Durability is, like user value and perception value, a relative value and depends on current qualities, future social values and future use of the physical environment and transport system.

  7. Vulnerable road users – Hierarchy of needs

  8. Vulnerable Road Users – Universal Design

  9. Vulnerable Road Users – Cascade approach

  10. Vulnerable Road Users - Discussion • What are ideas regarding making the principles operational? • What views and experiences are there in the USA regarding systems approach?

  11. Safety Culture in Hazardous Goods Transport • Issue: feasibility of implementation of Safety Care Systems in the Hazardous Goods Transport industry. • Reason: pursuit of continuous improvement of safety as part of the Dutch policy note on HGT; catastrophic nature of accidents • Current situation: divers market situation; overall relatively safe • Pre-conditioning for measures not yet favourable • Policy scenarios: • Education, communication and enforcement • Using market mechanisms

  12. Safety Culture in HGT – divers market The market: • International character • Many different players: • shippers (interests, imago) • large, medium sized and small transport firms (cost control, options for implementing SC) • mixed and specialised transporters • ‘rogue’ drivers and firms from the formal East Block • Charters • Many different products and clients • industrial chemicals • Gasses • Fuel distribution • Ammunition and fireworks • Waste and refuse transport • Specialised transport vehicles and containerization

  13. Safety Culture in HGT – current situation • Hardly any serious accidents, but clearly a public fear - political item. • Hazardous Goods Traffic is very divers and relatively safe. Main distinction: • long distance bulk transport, medium and large firms; good safety record • Distribution = small firms; questionable safety record • Chemical industry (mainly petrochemicals) regulate transport safety • Distribution market parties are not interested in implementing Safety Culture

  14. Safety Culture in HGT - trends Trends in Europe and NL: • Internationalisation • Common Market-effect; intake of new EU states and other former East European states • Outsourcing to cheap foreign drivers and small companies • Containerisation • Development of strong containers for fluids and gasses • Less special demand on driver/transporter skills and education • Fragmentation • Outsourcing transport by shippers • Outsourcing transport to former employees

  15. Safety Culture in HGT – towards implementation • Pre-conditioning for measures • Vehicle requirements • License system • Liability transfer: insurance resolutive conditions • Policy scenarios: • ‘there is something for everybody’: problem awareness; analysis & quick wins; tailored solutions; building on current safety care; communition and education. • Market scenario: market mechanism; incentives; flanking policy; bonus/malus; integrated

  16. Safety Culture - Discussion • Small companies inherently more unsafe? • Is outsourcing controllable? • What real options are there to implement Safety Management?

  17. Sustainable Road Safety – an update • Reason: ambitious targets; limitation of traditional approaches re. achievements • Man is measure of things • Prevention is better than a curative approach • Road classification • Integrated policies • Safety principles See website: www.sustainablesafety.nl

  18. Sustainable Road Safety – human centred Man is measure of things: • environment (road, vehicle) should conform to what humans are capable of and provide protection • humans should be properly instructed to prepare them for safe behaviour • Humans should eventually be supervised to see whether they are safe road users

  19. Sustainable Road Safety: focus on prevention Primary preventive approach: • System approach, but focussed on safety • Prevention of latent errors that can lead to dangerous behaviour and ultimately crashes • Application of 5 safety principles ( 2 new) • Decentralisation of responsibilities and implementation • Supervision and inspection

  20. Sustainable Safety - principles • Functionality of roads Roads should either flow (flow roads) or provide access (access roads) and are connected by distributor roads • Homogeneity of masses and/or speed and direction Vehicles that differ too much in mass or speed and that use the same space should be physically separated from each other • Predictability/ recognizability Layout of road and predictability of road course and road behaviour; self explaining roads, vehicles and human behaviour • Forgivingness Accidents should not lead to (severe) injury of death • State awareness capability or possibility of road users estimating own task competency correctly; every road users should know what his skills are and act accordingly

  21. Sustainable Safety – effects and lessons • Since introduction many improvements • Road classification • Traffic Calming: > 50% of urban roads are 30 km/h • Roundabouts on distributor roads • Moped from cycle paths to carriage way • Shared responsibility National – Regional – Local authorities • Enhanced law enforcement: speeds, DUI, safety belt, bicycle lights • Impulse to traffic safety education • Too little focus on non-infrastructural aspects of the vision • Low cost implementation limits effectiveness

  22. Sustainable Safety – issues Basic components: • Infrastructure • Vehicles • Education • Legislation and law enforcement Special issues: • Speed management • Drink-and-drug driving • Cyclists and pedestrians • Motorized two-wheelers • Heavy Goods Vehicles

  23. Sustainable Safety – Light Rail example • Light rail: a come-back in urban areas in EU • Risk: • Level crossings • Relatively large mass • Silent vehicles • Evasive actions by light rail no option • Relatively low risk levels for cars, but VRU meet high fatality risk levels (bike 30x, pedestrian 40x) • Safety requirements: • Preferably different levels crossing • If not possible: • distributor road crossing only fully guarded • Property access roads: guarded • If not possible: Light Rail speeds less than 30 km/h at level crossings

  24. Sustainable Safety - Discussion • Second generation policies: a bridge too far? • tackling current problems versus prevention: can it all be done? • making safety principles operational? • preconditions for success?

More Related