1 / 21

Anti-solenoid design status

Anti-solenoid design status . Latest field maps and doors inclusion in the MDI model. Part one: Field maps. Field maps – BZ. Field maps – BZ & BZ interp. Field maps – BZ interp. Field maps – BR. Field maps – BR & BR interp . Field maps – BR interp. Can we clean this much?.

bao
Download Presentation

Anti-solenoid design status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Anti-solenoid design status Latest field maps anddoors inclusion in the MDI model A. Bartalesi

  2. Part one: Field maps A. Bartalesi

  3. Field maps – BZ A. Bartalesi

  4. Field maps – BZ & BZ interp. A. Bartalesi

  5. Field maps – BZ interp. A. Bartalesi

  6. Field maps – BR A. Bartalesi

  7. Field maps – BR & BR interp. A. Bartalesi

  8. Field maps – BR interp. A. Bartalesi

  9. Can we clean this much? Those field maps may look too much processed.BUT: • This is the best we can obtain with the actual configuration: if those maps are still bad for the beam we will need additional shielding or correctors. • Inside QD0 BZ and BR will be surely zero on the magnetic axis, except in case of severe (unacceptable) saturation of QD0 • Shielding the beam line outside the detector should be easy. A. Bartalesi

  10. Part two: cavern doors A. Bartalesi

  11. Cavern doors (in carbon steel)have been included First thing to notice: saturation of the doors (1.4 T at the center) A. Bartalesi

  12. Forces have been integrated Region of integration: a “half door” A. Bartalesi

  13. Resulting forces and torques • FX -1052 N cancellation 70.0% • FY -2 N cancellation 99.8% • FZ -142400 N cancellation 2.2% • MX 384 Nm cancellation 99.9% • MY -2042 Nm cancellation 79.1% • MZ 14 Nm cancellation 99.9% (Torques are evaluated at the center of the integrated region) Self balanced loads, investigate stresses? Each half door attracts the other half A. Bartalesi

  14. Field outside the yokeon XY plane A. Bartalesi

  15. Field outside the yokeon XZ plane A. Bartalesi

  16. Field outside the yokeon XY plane WITHOUT doors 40 mT Door position 8 mT Yoke end (8 m) X 50 m from IP A. Bartalesi

  17. Flux escaping from the yokeWITHOUT doors Integrated BZ = 3.5 Tm² A. Bartalesi

  18. Considerations Remarking that the field outside the yoke strongly depends on the yoke lamination and material, which are not final yet, we can observe: • The field outside the yoke is very low, in the order of 0.01 T at 14 m from the IP. Integration from radius 8 m to 50 m gives 14 Tm². • However the doors occupy a section which is just 0.4 m² in the XY plane, and they are big objects with large attraction capability. Integration of field on the door XY section gives just 0.56 Tm². • Further investigation on the shielding? A. Bartalesi

  19. Conclusions • From a field map point of view, the effect on beam dynamics is being shown by B.Dalena today.In terms of anti-solenoid performance, there is not really a margin of improvement without reconsidering the overall layout. • About the cavern doors, the forces estimated seems addressable. The shielding provided and the permanent magnetization of the steel still need some investigation. A. Bartalesi

  20. Thank you very much for your attention! I wish you a Merry Christmas and a happy new year  A. Bartalesi

  21. Appendix:material used for doors A. Bartalesi

More Related