1 / 4

CLIC01_SiD_p01 with QD0 support tube and anti-solenoid

CLIC01_SiD_p01 with QD0 support tube and anti-solenoid. lose angular coverage in f orward region: approximately ECAL: 155 mrad -> 290 mrad HCAL: 143 mrad -> 212 mrad Muons : 68 mrad -> 131 mrad l oss of physics reach p ossibility to compensate b y “plug” calorimeters

telyn
Download Presentation

CLIC01_SiD_p01 with QD0 support tube and anti-solenoid

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CLIC01_SiD_p01 with QD0 support tube and anti-solenoid lose angular coverage in forward region: approximately ECAL: 155 mrad -> 290 mrad HCAL: 143 mrad-> 212 mrad Muons: 68 mrad -> 131 mrad loss of physics reach possibility to compensate by “plug” calorimeters -> additional weight to be carried by support tube ...

  2. CLIC01_ILD with QD0 support tube and anti-solenoid lose angular coverage in forward region: approximately ECAL: 160 mrad -> 200 mrad HCAL: 130 mrad-> 190 mrad Muons: 65 mrad -> 110 mrad loss of physics reach possibility to compensate by “plug” calorimeters -> additional weight to be carried by support tube ...

  3. Questions and Comments (1) • what are the consequences of the loss in forward angular • coverage (in the calorimeters and the muon system) ? • do we need a “ring” ECaland /or “plug” HCal ? • NB. BeamCal and LumiCal are covering  12 – 140 mrad • and can be seen as “ECal-like” • beware: adding a “plug” requires a stronger support tube • which in turn might mean additional loss of • angular coverage !

More Related