90 likes | 235 Views
Africa Program for Education Impact Evaluation. Improving Teaching and Learning in Classrooms by Reducing Teacher Absenteeism in Uganda. Impact Evaluation Team. AFRICA IMPACT EVALUATION INITIATIVE, AFTRL. Questions.
E N D
Africa Program for Education Impact Evaluation Improving Teaching and Learning in Classrooms by Reducing Teacher Absenteeism in Uganda Impact Evaluation Team AFRICA IMPACT EVALUATION INITIATIVE, AFTRL
Questions • What is the impact of strengthening the school management committees (SMCs) to monitor and report on teacher attendance? • What is the impact of strengthening reporting linkages between the coordination centers (CCs) and the district education office? • What is the impact of combining the two types of interventions • Overall Question: Which is the most cost-effective intervention for increasing teacher attendance?
Impact Evaluation Design • The proposed evaluation with employ multiple treatments at different levels. • Randomized assignment shall be done at two levels: • Random assignment of the Coordinating Centers to TREATMENT or CONTROL for CC monitoring • Within each CC, random assignment of the schools to TREATMENT or CONTROL for SMC monitoring
Indicators • Teacher absenteeism • Student Performance (Learning competencies (using the National Assessment of Primary Education and the Primary Leaving Examination) • Pupil attendance • Completion rates • Wastage • Repetition rates • Dropout rates • Monitoring visits and Reports by the SMCs • Monitoring reports send to DEO by the CCTs • Increase follow-up (e.g. sanctions) taken in reaction to teacher absenteeism cases • Increased reports of conflict between the SMCs and the head teachers • Visits and reports by the District Inspectors
Sample and Data • A sample size of 64 CCs and 8 schools per CCs (so 512 schools) will be enough to detect, with a power of 0.8 and a level of 0.05 : • A reduction in teacher absenteeism of 10% • An increase in average school performance at national exams of 0.1 standard deviation • Baseline Survey • Spot checks by SMC • Quarterly Surveys • School administrative records • Monthly reports by CCs • Reports by District Inspectors • Annual School Census (EMIS data) • National exams results by school (PLE) • National Assessment of Primary Education (NAPE) –Competency Tests*
Staffing Plan • Impact Evaluation Team • Intervention Piloting Team • Education Planning (M&E Section) • Policy Selling—Champion • Policy Analysis Unit
Timeline • Process that you will follow to gain acceptance • Concept Note • Present Concept Note • Permanent Secretary—July 4, 2007 • Monitoring and Evaluation Working Group—July 18, 2007 • Education Sector Consultative Committee—August 1, 2007 • Submit Proposal to EPDF—August 2007 • Visit for Impact Evaluation Group (1 to 2 weeks)—August 2007 • Baseline—November, 2007 • Pilot Implementation—February through November, 2008 • Follow-up—November, 2008 • Evaluation Results—February, 2009
Budget • TBD