1 / 9

Open Source as a different Silver Bullet

Exploring the potential of open source software to address the software crisis, improve productivity and reliability, and overcome adoption barriers. This article discusses the concept of reusing code, incremental development, and the role of great designers in open source projects. Preliminary research suggests that open source development may offer greater speed and quality compared to commercial software.

barbarasmith
Download Presentation

Open Source as a different Silver Bullet

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Open Source as a different Silver Bullet Carlo Daffara Conecta Srl, AMOS project cdaffara@conecta.it http://www.amosproject.org Advancing the research Agenda on Free/Open source Software Brussels, 14 Oct. 2002

  2. Software is pervasive, our preferred way to add intelligence to objects Software is the basis for most of the current world economic infrastructure, and is behind the improvements in health care, logistics, manufacturing... Of 24 technologies of the future, 18 are software intensive Despite this, we are still unable to cope with software complexity We are in the same “software crisis” first described in 1968

  3. The Standish Group reports that, for US companies in 1998, regarding software/IT projects: 26% succeeded (it was 27% in 1996) 28% failed 46% are “challenged” (over budget, over time, with fewer functionality). We must consider that many CIO now prefer to turn a failure in a “challenge” to avoid a negative loss to be written off immediately on the balance sheets

  4. Why? Brooks described some structural reasons in his “No Silver Bullet” paper (1987), and formulated his law as: “there is no single development, in either technology or management technique, that by itself promises even one order of magnitude improvement in productivity, reliability, in simplicity” Despite the years, and several trials, the basic assumptions still hold true So, it seems that there is no hope...

  5. Brooks describes some potential “attacks” that collectively may improve the situation, and mentions: Buy, don't build Incremental development, prototyping, testing Great designers

  6. In the open source world, we would say: Reuse code, don't build Incremental development, prototyping, testing Great designers (open source projects have usually a “core” group that plan, design, develops)

  7. If that's true, the open source software development process shuld show greater speed/quality Some preliminary results seems to say that: Comparing productivity in loc/hour, open source vs. commercial: 1 to 1.5, despite open source programmers average half the hours Comparing quality: a test of Apache evolution shows defect density significantly lower [Mockus, Fielding, Herbsleb]

  8. But we need to prove it! We need research, comparable to that made by Standish, to see if open source (both as methodology and as potential resource to be tapped) improves the final outcomes We need to discover what hurdles and barriers exist in the adoption of open source, and see if those can be overcomed through government (including university) or private support We must shamelessly use what has already been developed, and try to leverage different projects to create synergies

  9. Questions?

More Related