250 likes | 732 Views
. 2. Sherritt International Corporation. Diversified Canadian natural resource company involved in the production of thermal coal, nickel, cobalt, oil and power$3 Billion asset base 2006 revenues $1.1 billion50 years of experience operating complex process plantsStrong mineral processing technology backgroundWorld class safety and labour relations record Operations in:Coal productionMetals mining and refiningOil and gas exploration and exploitationPower generation.
E N D
1. Clean Coal Technology Initiatives by Sherritt Technologies
February 26, 2008
2. 2 Sherritt International Corporation Diversified Canadian natural resource company involved in the production of thermal coal, nickel, cobalt, oil and power
$3 Billion asset base
2006 revenues $1.1 billion
50 years of experience operating complex process plants
Strong mineral processing technology background
World class safety and labour relations record
Operations in:
Coal production
Metals mining and refining
Oil and gas exploration and exploitation
Power generation
3. 3
4. 4 Carbon Development Partnership (CDP) A partnership between Sherritt and Ontario Teachers
5. 5 Major Coal DepositsA Partnership Advantage
6. 6 Typical Coal Mining Sequence
7. 7 Coal Conversion TechnologiesFlow Sheet Options
8. 8 Benefits to Alberta and Canada from Coal Conversion Technologies
Gasification technology will provide a cost effective and a stable long term source of hydrogen for the Alberta Petrochemical industry – the ‘new’ Alberta Advantage.
Gasification technology provides a secure, economic, reliable and ‘clean’ feed stock supply for power generation for the oil-sands industry
Allows sequestration of CO2, enabling enhanced oil recovery (EOR) to be expanded and allow significant additional recovery of conventional oil resources
9. 9 Bridge Project – Phase 1Beneficiation of Western coals
Objective:
“ to develop cost effective cleaning technologies for low rank coals for use in pulverized fuel boilers and for gasification”
In conjunction with Alberta Energy Research Institute (started in 2004)
10. 10 Bridge Project – Phase 2Gasification of Western Coals Impact of beneficiation on gasification
Reduced capital costs for syn-gas cleanup
Increased reliability of the gasification process
Increased gasification potential for Sherritt coals
Improved fuels handling
Determine scale-up potential
This project was also funded jointly by Sherritt and
Alberta Energy Research Institute
11. 11 Bridge Project – Phase 1
Project Plan:
Characterization of all Western Canadian Coals
Mechanical Separation
Pressure Pyrolysis
Solvent Extraction
Integrated Flow Sheet Development
12. 12 Air Jig Lignite evaluated at Falkirk showed potential application of Air Jig
BTU increase: 1-6%
Ash reduction: 5-23%
SO2 reduction: 8-31%
Hg reduction: 13-32%
Quote requested:
$310K plus installation and operating costs
Searching for bench scale unit to pre-evaluate different coals, then pilot the ones with potential
13. 13 Fluid Bed Dryer Moisture reduction and ash removal
Lehigh University bench experiments completed
Additional piloting at Great River Energy to follow
14. 14 Wet Pyrolysis Because certain types of gasifiers are slurry-fed, their overall efficiency is dependant upon the coal/water ratio in the feed stream
A reduction in equilibrium moisture content would allow us to ship drier, higher calorific value coal from the plant site to our existing customers without the worries of spontaneous combustion
Reduced shipping costs (less water shipped)
Higher boiler efficiency
The result is a higher overall heating value fuel that can be fed into a gasifier or boiler
A reduction in slag and ash forming components would reduce fouling and corrosion in the existing plants, increasing their operating efficiency and reducing their maintenance costs
15. 15 Process Flow Diagram Heat recovery via flash tanks
Autoclave (we have the know-how)
Heat recovery via flash tanks
Autoclave (we have the know-how)
16. 16 Solvent ExtractionProcess Overview
17. 17 Integrated Flow Sheet Development
18. 18 Barriers to Gasification of low rank coals Technical Barriers
Coals are higher in ash and in moisture (compared to Bituminous)
Coals can not be “slurried” to the required solids content for it to be economical for either combustion or gasification
High sodium content will potentially cause ‘fouling’ problems in the down stream equipment
Commercial Barriers (ref: EPRI survey)
High capital costs for gasification
Low reliability and availability
High O & M costs
19. 19 Development of “Optimal Gasification Technology” for Western Canadian Feed stocks
Conduct a “proof-of concept” study at Siemens gasification facilities (formerly Future Energy) to gather data on the behaviour of slag characteristics under different oxygen/feed ratios
Collect large scale data on the gasification and the water treatment areas
Based on the information come with a ‘optimal strategy’ to select and operate an economically viable gasifier for Western Canadian feed stocks
20. 20 Bridge Project - # 1619Proof of Concept study for Gasification at Future Energy, Germany
Approximately 40 tons of coal (8 tons of CV, 12 tons of Dodds and 20 tons of boundary dam) and 5 tons of petroleum coke were shipped to Future energy in July.
All the samples were ground ( 95% - 100 micron and dried) at a pilot vertical mill operated by Klaudius-Peters and the ground samples were bagged, sealed under nitrogen and sent to Future energy
Pre fluidization tests were conducted on all our samples to determine the drying level for each of the coals.
Gasification tests were conducted between Nov 12 to Dec 2, 2005
21. 21
22. 22 Some Preliminary Conclusions The proof-of-concept tests proved that the entrained flow gasifier with a quench is the right technology for our coals
All the coals tested gasify readily yielding high carbon conversions and cold gas efficiencies
All the coals tested fluidize easily and conveyed through the high density mass flow system to the gasifier.
The slagging characteristics of all the coals tested were satisfactory and did not create any flow or plugging problems
The Dodds-coke mixture yielded good syngas flow and produced a slag at 1700 C
The pure petroluem coke yielded much less syn gas (H2+CO) and much higher CO2 content (>15%). The slagging temperature was also high (>1900 C) and produced high viscosity slag.
The relative leachability of these slags showed that pure coke gasification without adequate flux will not produce environmentally acceptable slag.
23. 23 Top of the gasifier
24. 24 View of the quench system
25. 25 The ‘Beautiful flame’ of the Syngasproduced from Dodds coal
26. 26 Path Forward Sherritt Technologies will be building a “Clean Coal Technology Center” for upgrading ‘low-rank’ coals to ‘higher rank’ coals by beneficiation
Sherritt Technologies will be willing to work with any potential end user (combustion or gasification) of Sherritt’s coals
The site for the center has been chosen
Laboratory facilities will be completed by Q3 2008