1 / 17

PROMISE: the Barnahus type MD/IA methodology and tracking tool

Learn about the methodology and tracking tool to enhance Barnahus MD/IA services. The presentation covers goals, timeline, development steps, piloting process, and next steps. Engage in discussions on methodology and goals. Evaluate the tracking tool's simplicity and effectiveness through piloting and analysis. Join us in shaping the future of child-friendly interventions.

barnesj
Download Presentation

PROMISE: the Barnahus type MD/IA methodology and tracking tool

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PROMISE: the Barnahus type MD/IA methodology and tracking tool Service Exchange Meeting 2, Reykavik 14-16 June 2016

  2. Content of the presentation • Introduction: what do we want to achieve with the methodology and the tracking tool and how? • Time table: development and pilots • Content • Discussionin groups • Next steps

  3. Introduction: the methodology • Aim: to develop a tool which can be used by services in their process to be(come) a Barnahus type MD/IA and to define what is still missing in order to finalise this process • The methodology is a self-evaluation tool for data collection and analysis of current practice The methodology is meant to INSPIRE, not to JUDGE

  4. Introduction: the tracking-tool • Aim: to perform a simple and quick check for services, based on the methodology • The tracking-tool is a user-friendly tool for services Stoplight-model

  5. Timetable development methodology and tracking tool • Step 1: Identification of workingelements: December 2015- January 2016 • Step 2: Identification of existingself-assessment-tools: December 2015-January 2016 • Step 3: Development of methodologyand tracking tool: February – October 2016

  6. Timetable pilot tracking tool • Step 1: Selection pilots: October-November 2015 • Step 2: Piloting tracking tool andgoodpractice guide CBSS: November 2016 –January 2017 Aims: a) verification of the tracking tool by testing its user friendliness and b) ‘a state of the art’ report of the main goals concerning being a Barnahus type MD/IA service in the pilot countries

  7. Step 3: Analysis of the Pilot: February –March 2017 • Step 4: Finalisationof the tracking-tool: March 2017 –May 2017

  8. Content • Background of the methodology: Excell grid PROMISE PRINCIPLES: child friendly interventions PROMISE CRITERIA: Barnahus type model MD/IA PROMISE STANDARDS: quality of services The methodology monitors the process of being an Barnahus type MD/IA service, NOT the quality

  9. Goals and Subgoals related to scores • Three perspectives • Comment Box • Link good practices guide CBSS

  10. 2. Who fills in the methodology? • A representative of the Barnahus type MD/IA service together with key stakeholders within the service

  11. 3. How does the representative collects the data? Hand-out: instructions for the representative • Meetings: 1 with management, 1 with professionals • Small survey among clients with SMILEY-PICTOGRAMS • Analysing the results in a score-system and give feedback to to the responsible persons

  12. Discussion points in working groups • Content of the methodology. Please your constructive comments on: A. the basis of the goals and subgoals related to the PROMISE principles, criteria and standards B. the way it has to be filled in by a representative of a service: organizing 2 meetings and 10 small questionnaires clients C. the questions for clients (children)

  13. 2. Which goals and subgoals are the most relevant for the development of the tracking tool and why(a distillation from the methodology)?

  14. Next steps Till October we will work on: • Finalise the methodology • Finalise the first concept tracking-tool • Program both in Excell • Link both products to the good practice guidance CBSS • Present final product methodology in Linköping • Prepare the pilots: in the beginning of November the pilot countries will get invited to fill in the concept tracking tool.

  15. Bedankt voor uw aandacht o.i.d. Thank you for you attention and constructive input!! Jodi Mak jmak@verwey-jonker.nl

  16. Discussion in small groups • Reading the table in the concept note concerning the methodology (10 minutes) • Discussing the methodology (30 minutes) A. the basis of the goals and subgoals related to the PROMISE vision, criteria and standards B. the way it has to be filled in by a representative of a service: organise2 meetings and 10 small questionnaires clients C. the questions for clients (children)

  17. 3. Short break (10 minutes) 4. Discussing the main goals/sub-goals for the development of the tracking-tool (30 minutes) 5. Plenary discussion (20 minutes)

More Related