130 likes | 141 Views
National Lidar Concept Presentation to FGDC Coordination Group October 13, 2009. Greg Snyder U.S. Geological Survey Land Remote Sensing Program. Briefing Outline. Lidar technology and applications Why a National Lidar program / data set Coordinating National Lidar Next steps.
E N D
National Lidar ConceptPresentation to FGDC Coordination Group October 13, 2009 Greg Snyder U.S. Geological Survey Land Remote Sensing Program
Briefing Outline • Lidar technology and applications • Why a National Lidar program / data set • Coordinating National Lidar • Next steps
Lidar - What Is It • Basic components- • Laser scanner • GPS • Inertial Navigation System • Terrestrial, airborne or space platforms • Laser scanner- • Emits laser beams at high frequency • Measures RT travel time of pulses from sensor to surface • Up to 200,000 pulses per second • Typical Aircraft Mission- • Speeds of 50-200 knots • Heights of 100 to 5,000 meters Requirements- • Mapping, forestry, resource management, climate science, etc... Resolutions/accuracies- • From centimeters to tens of meters
Why a National Lidar Dataset is Needed • Upgrade the National Elevation Dataset (NED) which is often of lower accuracy than required • Average NED RMSE is approximately 2-meters • FEMA guidelines for flood hazard mapping require 18cm RMSE • 3-D data for vegetation and built-up features has never been widely collected • Existing data lidar collections are not consistent across projects • The community is looking for systematic, consistent, multipurpose base data set
Hydrology Bare Earth Elevation Orthoimagery Structures Mapping Applications from Lidar Land Cover Contours Lidar
Land Cover Vegetation / Biomass Range of Potential National Lidar Applications Volcano monitoring Earthquake faults Hydrologic Studies Urban / Suburban Response Carbon / Disturbance studies Coastal Studies
National Lidar Programmatic Goals • Leverage and expand ongoing Federal and State activities towards national coverage • Gain efficiency / economies of scale to meet interdisciplinary agency mission needs • Expand Federal and State partnerships and stakeholder interaction • Work from a structured business plan (requirements, cost/benefit, project design, technology data mgt) • Maximize commercial sector involvement • Seek best available operational technologies to reduce cost and collection time • Promote expanded applications
Data Goals • Nationally consistent 3-D measurements of terrain, vegetation and built-up features • Consistent methodology and specifications to match measurements between projects • Flexibility to accommodate variations in regional needs (topography, land cover, etc.) • Retains and delivers all data for multiple applications (bare-earth, vegetation, structures, etc.) • Requirements-driven data refresh cycle • Public domain and readily available
Stakeholders • Federal players include USGS, FEMA, NOAA, USDA, USACE, NASA, NGA… • States, local, tribal governments • Organizations: • AASG • NSGIC • ASPRS, AAG, etc • MAPPS • Science consortiums • Others…
Coordination Options and Approaches • Possibly form a new Federal lidar coordination group • Leverage the interagency National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP) • NDEP agencies coordinate operational elevation programs today • Gain executive-level visibility and support from FGDC • Regular updates and discussions with FGDC • National Geospatial Advisory Committee (NGAC) FACA provides Non-Federal views and recommendations • Interact directly with State and local organizations • Interact broadly with stakeholders at public / professional meetings and individually
Summary and Observations • There is strong stakeholder interest in a national lidar data set for topographic and non-topographic applications • It is important to retain the full lidar data set for interdisciplinary applications • A formal interagency process and structured National Lidar business plan is needed • There is great benefit (and complexity) in blending national requirements, funding and priorities • Partner involvement may include data, funding, technology, applications, etc. • Industry’s implementation capability is significant
FY 2010 • Fund a National Lidar study (cost / benefit, project design, etc.) • Refine interagency and other stakeholder coordination mechanisms • Recommend a long-term national lidar program