230 likes | 389 Views
SCHIP in California Covers Nearly 1.1 Million Children. California’s SCHIP is the biggest in the country: greater than the next 3 largest states combined! What this means: California has done a fabulous job enrolling uninsured children–over 1.3 million (HFP and MC)!!!!!!
E N D
SCHIP in California Covers Nearly 1.1 Million Children California’s SCHIP is the biggest in the country: greater than the next 3 largest states combined! What this means: • California has done a fabulous job enrolling uninsured children–over 1.3 million (HFP and MC)!!!!!! • California expenditures (and, to some degree, policy) drive the national budget.
SCHIP Reauthorization History • Twice, bipartisan bills were sent to the President: • Vetoed H.R. 976 on October 3, 2007: CHIPRA 1 • Vetoed H.R. 3963 on December 12, 2007: CHIPRA 2 • October 1, 2007 funds expired (Reauthorization fails!) • December 29, 2007 SCHIP funding extension bill signed – Does not change policy – Flat-funds state allotments and adds supplemental funds for 21 shortfall states (including CA) thru March 31, 2009 • February 4, 2009 President Obama signs CHIPRA 3, a 4 ½ year extension of SCHIP
CHIPRA • Adequacy of Federal Funding
Funding California’s CHIP Coverage:What Will it Cost? Harbage Consulting February 17, 2009 Draft Release 2009 Prepared for the California HealthCare Foundation
6 Background: California’s Title XXI Programs Draft Copy 12/1/2014 Note: HFP includes legal immigrant children and AIM-linked infants. AIM enrolled a total of 12,415 women in SFY 07-08, with an average of 1,035 new mothers enrolling every month.
7 California’s Overall Estimate Draft Copy 12/1/2014
California’s Overall Federal Need 8 Draft Copy 12/1/2014 $2,193 $1,259 $760 $667
HFP Projected Enrollment 9 Draft Copy 12/1/2014
Access to Full Presentation • Full presentation available at www.mrmib.ca.gov. • One first screen, look to HFP/Federal Issues
Conclusion • Ample federal funding for FFY 2009 and 2010 • Future federal allotments dependent on what states’ have spent (“rebasing”) • It still takes a state dollar to get 2 federal dollars. The state of California has invested significantly in SCHIP, particularly during these difficult fiscal times. It is an incredible challenge to come up with the state match.
CHIPRA 3: Policy Issues • In addition to providing sufficient federal funding for SCHIP, CHIPRA 3 enacted a number of policy and fiscal changes. • A number of these require policy guidance from CMS. • The state will have to amend state law to implement some of them. • Several are in the jurisdiction of Medi-Cal rather than HFP.