280 likes | 400 Views
The Engineering IT Revolution – Friend or Foe?. The Engineering IT Revolution – Friend or Foe?. Colin Astin Technical Director CB&I John Brown Limited. In the beginning …. The Industrial Revolution. 100 years. The Engineering IT Revolution. 10 years. The 10 year jump. 1978
E N D
The Engineering IT Revolution – Friend or Foe? The Engineering IT Revolution – Friend or Foe? Colin Astin Technical Director CB&I John Brown Limited
The Industrial Revolution 100 years
The Engineering IT Revolution 10 years
The 10 year jump 1978 We acquired a Prime mini computer and a £14,000 Tektronix 4014 terminal 1990 + By the early 90’s when SG machines were introduced we had abolished drawing boards 2002 No space for drawings boards and we run PDMS on a PC with two flat screens
Quotes • ‘’The first contractor to go back to pencil and paper will make a fortune’’ (John Brown Director circa 1988)
Quotes • ‘’Can we finish off the ISOs by hand?’’ (most of the Piping Group)
Quotes • If you don’t use CAD you won’t pre-qualify for this project (various Oil Companies)
The Human FactorEarly days • Low computer literacy • Paper designs • Design copied into 3-D CAD • Deliverables partly automated but some marked up
The Human FactorDevelopment stage • Higher computer literacy • Design developed in CAD • Deliverables direct from 3-D CAD BUT • Same working methods
The Human FactorToday • Working methods changed • Single point data entry (MTO etc.) • Parallel working • Different deliverables • Fabricator generates spools from model • No PGA’s • Significant productivity gain • Substantial construction benefits
Case study 1 • 200 plus ISO’s with one team on a fast track schedule = poor productivity • Introduced progress tracking using spare PDMS attributes • Each designer is identified by his initials against each pipe run • Pipe progressed in 6 stages using simple status codes and content definition
Case study 2 • Major bottleneck in pipe supports • Shortage of pipe support designers • Additional manpower produced lower productivity • Support design lagged piping design • Workflow investigation concluded that skilled support designers were being used inefficiently
Case study 2 – The solution • Pipers design simple supports under supervision • Complex supports reserved for the most competent designers • Less computer literate designers do checking rather than data input
The future Short term challenge – • Further incremental improvements • Parallel working • Remove obsolete tasks • Develop technical skills base
The future Longer term developments – • Project life cycle improvements • Construction, commissioning, operation • Information accessibility • Data warehousing • Work sharing
Summary • The revolution was bloodless but not painless • Our design tools are now radically different • We are more efficient • We have shrunk the world • We are moving towards project life cycle improvements • The Engineering IT revolution : • FRIEND not foe!