150 likes | 413 Views
Policy Approaches to Women and Gender Equality. Approaches to Women and Gender Equality. Two conceptual frameworks: “Women in Development” and “Gender and Development” Different policy approaches: welfare, equity, anti-poverty, efficiency, empowerment and gender mainstreaming.
E N D
Approaches to Women and Gender Equality • Two conceptual frameworks: “Women in Development” and “Gender and Development” • Different policy approaches: welfare, equity, anti-poverty, efficiency, empowerment and gender mainstreaming Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Approaches to Women and Gender Equality Different policy approaches: • welfare, • equity, • anti-poverty, • efficiency, • empowerment • gender mainstreaming Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Welfare approach • earliest approach, predominant 1950-1970. • aim is to bring women into the development as better mothers. • women are seen as the passive beneficiaries of development emphasizing their reproductive role • seeks to meet practical gender needs in that role through a top-down handouts of food aid, measures against malnutrition and family planning • not challenging, especially of gender division of labour, and still widely popular. Source: March, C., Smyth, I., and Mukhopahhyay, M. (1999). A Guide to Gender Analysis Frameworks. Oxfam: Oxford Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Equity approach • original WID approach, emerged during in the 76-85 UN Women’s Decade, within the predominant “growth with equity” development approach • aim is to gain equity for women who are seen as active participants in development • recognizes women’s triple role (productive, reproductive and community), and seeks to meet strategic gender interests by direct state intervention giving political and economic autonomy and reducing inequality with men. • challenges women’s subordinate position • criticised as western feminism, is considered threatening to men and is unpopular with governments and donors. Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Anti- Poverty approach • 2nd WID approach, a toned-down version of equity, from 1970s onwards in the context of Basic Needs approaches to development • women seen as disproportionately represented among poor • aim is to ensure that poor women increase their productivity • women’s poverty is seen as a problem of underdevelopment, not of subordination • recognizes the productive role of women, and seeks to meet their practical to earn an income, particularly in small scale income generation projects • still most popular with NGOs Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Efficiency approach • 3rd WID approach, adopted since the 1980s debt crisis. • aims to ensure that development is more efficient and effective through women’s economic contribution, with participation often equated with equity and decision making • seeks to meet practical gender needs while relying in all three roles and an elastic concept of women’s time • women seen in terms of their capacity to compensate for declining social services by extending their working day Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Empowerment • articulated by third-world women with aim to empower women through greater self-reliance • explicitly acknowledges centrality of power and women’s need for more power to improve position • women’s subordination is expressed in terms of male oppression and colonial and neo-colonial oppression • recognizes the triple role; seeks to meet strategic gender interests indirectly thru grassroots mobilization of practical gender needs • potentially challenging, but its avoidance of western feminism makes it unpopular except with third world women’s NGOs. Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Gender mainstreaming • associated with the 1995 World Conference on Women in Beijing and the Beijing Platform of Action that signaled the UN’s first official use of the term • call for “gender mainstreaming” was a culmination of two inter-related changes in discourse prior to Beijing: • Women in Development to gender and development • “integrating women” to “mainstreaming gender” Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Gender mainstreaming • Women in Development to gender and development • some improvements in women’s material conditions, but little progress in their status • the nature of women’s relational subordination was ignored and unequal gender power relations remained unaltered • “integrating women” vs. “mainstreaming gender” • relates to the second problem associated with WID, the continued marginalization of women and women’s issues from “mainstream” development • mainly due to how WID was implemented: the establishment of women’s national machineries and WID units and the emphasis on “women’s projects” • “mainstreaming” was seen as a way of promoting gender equity in all of the “organization’s pursuits” Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl