130 likes | 272 Views
Unocal Alaska Web-Based Gas-Lift Surveillance Paul Burtis Chris Ruff Scott Herman. February 2002. Unocal Alaska Operations Map. Typical Gas-Lift Completion. Typical Gas-Lift Surveillance Processes. Vendor-Driven Predominant at Unocal Unocal delegates design and surveillance
E N D
Unocal Alaska Web-Based Gas-Lift SurveillancePaul BurtisChris RuffScott Herman February 2002
Typical Gas-Lift Surveillance Processes • Vendor-Driven • Predominant at Unocal • Unocal delegates design and surveillance • Results in unknown optimization level • Operator Staff-Driven • Engineer Part-Time • Work typically prioritized downward • Technician Full-Time • Optimum results
Typical Gas-Lift Surveillance Processes Vendor-Driven • Timetable driven surveillance • Engineering staff typically uninformed about key design and operation parameters • Operators not fully aware of these parameters
Unocal Alaska Gas Lift Surveillance Process • Dedicated staffing • Informed decisions based on data • Web-assisted surveillance
Surveillance Program - 2000 • Optimization work performed on 19% of active • gas lift wells in 2000 • Gas lift diagnostics run on 34% of active gas lift • completions
Surveillance Program - 2001 Results • Previous program well turnaround = 60 days • Current process = 2 days • Average production deferment = 50 bopd • Deferred yearly program revenue = $480,000
Conclusions • Gas lift completions require continuous • surveillance to yield optimum returns • Web-based technology is available to • systematically change current surveillance • This technology requires key staff understand • their key performance / design parameters