1 / 22

Special Investigation Service of the Republic of Lithuania

Special Investigation Service of the Republic of Lithuania. Special Investigation Service. Special investigation Service was established on 18 February 1997 under the Ministry of Interior. 18 February 1997. Special Investigation Service. Case No. 08-1-007-97. Targets. Government.

berb
Download Presentation

Special Investigation Service of the Republic of Lithuania

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Special Investigation Service of the Republic of Lithuania

  2. Special Investigation Service Special investigation Service was established on 18 February 1997 under the Ministry of Interior 18 February 1997

  3. Special Investigation Service Case No.08-1-007-97 Targets Government Ministry of Interior 21 October 1997 Police department Police Regional police station Police station Subdivision of Safety Police Subdivision Policemen

  4. Special Investigation Service Case No.08-1-007-97 Investigative techniques used to reveal thecrime • Imitation of criminal activity was authorized by the Prosecutor General under the law on Operative activities. • The operatives of STT were allowed to violate traffic rules and offer a bribe to any police officer.

  5. Special Investigation Service Case No.08-1-007-97 Technical and tactical means used • The amount of 100 USD and 600 Litas was taken out from the special account and prepared to be handed as a bribe. • A secret video camera was camouflaged in the hand bagof the operative in order to document a conversation with the policemen. • The private car of one of the operatives was used.

  6. Special Investigation Service Case No.08-1-007-97 Investigative actions taken • The crime scene was examined. • The money, handed over as a bribe was found and examined. • 9 whitness including officers of the STT were intervieved. • 2 suspects were interrogated and partially admited being guilty. • There was no need for IT / mobile phones forensic. • There was no need for audio/video forensic. • There was no need for financial audid / experise.

  7. Special Investigation Service Case No.08-1-007-97 Legal outcome Decision of the Vilnius regional court of 27 April 1998 27 April 1998 J.S. J.V. Policeman Policeman • 2 years of correctional work • without imprisonment. • Confiscation of ¼ of the property. • 2 years of correctional work • without imprisonment • Confiscation of ¼ of the property. • Restriction to work in law enforcement institutions for 3 years.

  8. Special Investigation Service The law on Special Investigation Service was accepted and STT became institution independent from the executive branch and accountable to the President and the Parliament. 2 May2000

  9. Special Investigation Service The Department on Corruption Prevention was established in STT. 1 July 2002

  10. Special Investigation Service Case No. 07-1-526-07 Targets President Parliament 25 October 2007 Government Municipality of Trakai Deputy Mayor Mayor Head of administration

  11. Special Investigation Service Case No. 07-1-526-07 Investigative techniques used to reveal a crime • Criminal intelligence investigation was conducted prior to the initiation of criminal investigation: • Informants were used to check the preliminary information and provide additional data. • The authorization of the judge was received in order to enter private premises and offices secretly. • The authorization of the judge was received in order to use technical means and intercept communication. • The authorization of the judge was received in order to conduct secret surveillance. • After the initiation of the pretrial investigation the intrusive means of investigation were maintained under the propositions of the Penal process code.

  12. Special Investigation Service Case No. 07-1-526-07 Technical and tactical means used • Technical means for secret video surveillance of the offices of the suspects were deployed. • Tactical combinations were used to secretly enter the offices of the suspects. • Data links were organized to transmit the intercepted data. • Wiretaping and secret surveillance were used to document the criminal activities. • Tactical combinations were used to check / document delivery of the money for the bribes.

  13. Special Investigation Service Case No. 07-1-526-07 Investigative actions taken • 20 searches and seizures were conducted. • 2 suspects detained. • 14 suspects were charged on 11 episodes of criminal activities. • 46 witeneses were interviewed. • audio forensic expertise of more than 50 relevant conversations was conducted. • There was no need for IT / mobile phones forensic. • There was no need for financial audit / experise .

  14. Special Investigation Service Case No. 07-1-526-07 Legal outcome Decision of the Vilnius district court of 27 June2013 V.P. L.K. S.R. 27 June 2013 Mayor Head of administration Deputy Mayor • 6 years of imprisonment • 5 years of imprisonment • 7 years of imprisonment Decision of the court of Apeals of 17 June2017 • 4 years of imprisonment postponing execution for 3 years. • 940 Euro payment to the fund of victims of the crimes • 4 years of imprisonment postponing execution for 3 years. • 940 Euro payment to the fund of victims of the crimes • 4 years of imprisonment postponing execution for 3 years. • 940 Euro payment to the fund of victims of the crimes

  15. Special Investigation Service Case No. 07-1-526-07 Legal outcome Decision of the Vilnius district court of 27 June2013. G.S. J.B. V.D. 27 June 2013 • 2 years of imprisonment postponing execution for a year and 6 months. • Fine of 750 Eur • 2 years of imprisonment postponing execution for a year. • Fine of 1000 Eur • Fine of 3750 Eur K.B. A.V. S.N. • Fine of 3750 Eur • 2 years of imprisonment postponing execution for 2 years. • Fine of 750 Eur • 1 year 6 months of imprisonment postponing execution for a year and 6 months. • Fine of 750 Eur

  16. Special Investigation Service Case No. 07-1-526-07 Legal outcome Decision of the Vilnius district court of 27 June2013. J.U. M.K. R.Ž. 27 June 2013 • 1 year 6 months of imprisonment postponing execution for 2 years. • Fine of 750 Eur • 2 years of imprisonment postponing execution for 2 years. • Fine of 750 Eur • Fine of 3750 Eur D.R. V.P. • 2 years of imprisonment postponing execution for 2 years. • Fine of 750 Eur • 1 year 6 months of imprisonment postponing execution for 2 years. • Fine of 750 Eur

  17. Special Investigation Service Case No. 07-1-526-07 Legal outcome Decision of the Vilnius district court of 27 June2013. Legal persons 27 June 2013 • Fine of 7500 Eur • Fine of 9400 Eur • Fine of 7500 Eur • Fine of 11300 Eur • Fine of 7500 Eur

  18. Special Investigation Service The ammendments of the Statute of the Special Investigation Service came into force. The legal status of the officers of the STT changed from public servants to state officials. 1 January 2016

  19. Special Investigation Service Case No. 02-7-00010-16 Targets President 21May2016 Parliament MP Political parties Group of companies

  20. Special Investigation Service Case No. 02-7-00010-16 What has been done conducting the investigation • 26 searches and seizures were conducted. • 8 ( 5 natural persons and 3 – legal persons) suspects were charged on 5 episodes of criminal activities. • > 100 witnesses were interviewed (~60 MP‘s). • forensic analysis of relevant audio conversations was conducted. • forensic analysis of handwriting was conducted. • forensic analysis of computers an other electronic devices was conducted. • expertise of the State Tax Inspectorate was used. • expertise of the Central electoral commision was used.

  21. Special Investigation Service Case No. 02-7-00010-16 Legal outcome Hopefully will be presented next time, on the ocasion of 20‘th anniversary of KNAB.

  22. Special Investigation Service of the Republic of Lithuania Daumantas Pocius Head of Vilius department Special Investigation Service of the Republic of Lithuania Daumantas.Pocius@stt.lt

More Related