170 likes | 824 Views
Structure. Reminder: The Employment RelationshipWhat are organizations?Different perspectives on the employment relationshipUnitarism, Pluralism, Marxism. What are Organizations? What is Employment Relationship?. Generally happy and harmonious places, people work towards common goal, work is seen as fulfillingGenerally sites of come conflict, people have different interests and goals depending on group membership, class or professional status, work is necessaryGenerally sites of exploitatio14
E N D
1. Employee Relations AC219 Perspectives on the Employment Relationship:
Unitarist and Pluralist Approaches
3. What are Organizations? What is Employment Relationship? Generally happy and harmonious places, people work towards common goal, work is seen as fulfilling
Generally sites of come conflict, people have different interests and goals depending on group membership, class or professional status, work is necessary
Generally sites of exploitation, where interests of capital owners are served, work is alienating
4. Unitarism and Pluralism Complex terms with long histories
Offer very different perspectives on organizations and employment relationships
Often seen as opposite ends of a continuum
In practice many shades within each approach
Different positions within unitarism can be located on a continuum
5. Unitarism Work organizations are an ‘integrated and harmonious whole existing for a common purpose’ (Farnham and Pimlott 1991)
Absence of conflict between capital and labour – members of the same team
Conflict is ‘pathological’
Organisation single source of authority, unitary in structure and purpose
Employees loyal to the organization
Emphasises organizational culture, organizational values, norms and common interests
6. Unitarism Assumed to be perspective most commonly held by many managers
See reflected in focus on ‘managerial prerogative’
Managers’ ‘right to manage’ emphasises managers acting in the interests of all in the organisation because they know best
See Purcell’s work on corporate management styles – differences within unitarism (traditional, paternalist, sophisticated paternalism) and
Guest and Hoque’s (1994) classification of non-union companies – good, bad, ugly and lucky
7. Unitarism Public policy issues
State to support and reinforce managerial prerogative
Removal of rights/power base to trade unions through legislation
Restore property and decision-making rights to managers
Removal of support for collective bargaining to widen basis of support for managerial decision-making
More active role for legislation to curb and in extreme cases outlaw strikes and other industrial action
8. Unitarism and ‘New Right’ In 1980s unitarism associated closely with ‘New Right’
Commitment to free markets and removal of obstacles to the operation of free markets – market imperfections
Trade unions, collective bargaining - major market imperfections
Restrictive legislation to restore power of employers and managers
Managers to be allowed to manage their enterprises as they see fit
9. Unitarism But
Why should managers’ values be accepted unquestioningly?
Why should we assume values of organisation = those of individuals and groups? Values of unitarism are superficially appealing but much more difficult to turn into practice
How sensible is an approach which assumes an unquestioning acceptance of managerial prerogative?
Problems with more active role of law in ER
We know that conflict does exist in organizations, how do unitarists explain this?
10. Pluralism For many (particularly academics) pluralism represents more appropriate and accurate description of organizations and employment relationships
Fox (1966) organization defined as;
‘a democratic state composed of sectional groups with divergent interests over which the government tries to maintain some kind of dynamic equilibrium’
11. Pluralism Organizations characterised by competing interests
Conflict inevitable and legitimate and structured into employment relationship
For pluralists conflict is manageable and resolvable
Focus on resolution of conflict – order, stability – rather than how generated
Tends to assume balance of power between parties with different interests
Legitimacy of trade unions as representing employee interests and countervailing power to management
12. Pluralism Major influence on Public policy in employment relations
Legalisation of trade unions and rights to ensure that independent unions can operate to defend and further employee interests
Encouragement and legal support for collective bargaining
New Deal in US in 1930s
Donovan Commission in Britain in 1960s and influence of ‘Oxford School’
13. Pluralism Traditionally, pluralism linked to economic interests – employees, employers
Interests more complex and identity linked to age, gender, race, ethnicity, religion, sexuality
Increasing wish to extend pluralism beyond the workplace (work of Ackers 2002)
Stakeholder model a classic example of pluralism – different interest require means to resolve interest differences
14. Pluralism But
Balance of power rarely exists in employee relations
Assumes some common ideology and an acceptance of ‘Marquis of Queensbury’ rules – willingness to ‘trust’ institutions and a moral duty to compromise
Assumes all conflict is manageable and resolvable
Assumes that parties are rational
Assumes a consensus on ‘truth’ and the values of outcomes
15. And Finally? Fox’s Journey Alan Fox – leading pluralist IR academic in 1960s member of ‘Oxford School’
Research report for Donovan Commission (1966)
By early 1970s – major questioning of pluralist position
Questioned legitimacy and sustainability of outcomes where ‘agreed’ in context of major power imbalances
Argued that trust and commitment to agreements only possible under a radically different economic system
Moves closer to radical and Marxist position