280 likes | 409 Views
SPATIAL ECONOMY AND DEMOGRAPHICS . USSR Population (Lost 15 mil to civil war/Stalin and 14 mil to WWII; Male shortage one reason for women in both workforce & home). Despite Annexations! . Population would have been 440 million in 1991 without wars. “State Socialism”. Central planning of
E N D
USSR Population(Lost 15 mil to civil war/Stalin and 14 mil to WWII;Male shortage one reason for women in both workforce & home) Despite Annexations! Population would have been 440 million in 1991 without wars
“State Socialism” • Central planning of “Command Economy” • Guaranteed job, low rents, health care, daycare, etc. • Heavy industrialization to catch up to West • Forced collectivization of private farmlands
Mutually dependent/ not self-sufficient Industrial regions • Ukraine (Donbass) • Urals • Siberia (Kuzbass) Urals Ukraine(Donbass) Siberia(Kuzbass)
Donbass & Kuzbass Donbass coal fields, E. Ukraine/ Russia bank of Don. Coal/steel region since 1870s Kuzbass coal fields, W. Siberia
Russian urban population • Soviets favored large industry over farms & cities • Moscow 30% industrial; Paris only 5% • Urbanization but without urban services/transit/life • Prefab worker apartment blocs / housing shortages
Soviet bloc city Budapest, Hungary
Russian migration • Soviet controls over movement, travel • Encouraged moves to big cities, labor shortage areas, frontier zones • Skilled Russians move to other republics, frontier • 3 mil. Russians moved back to Russia, 1990s
Soviet ruraleconomy • At first divided aristocrats’/ church estates for peasants • Stalin forced collectivization of private farms • Consolidated farmland into Kolkhoz (Cooperative Farm) and Sovkhoz (State Farm), like large estates • Same in E. Europe 1950s (except Poland, Yugo.)
Drawbacks of Soviet agriculture • Stalin murdered Kulaks (well-off peasants), 1930s • Peasants had low status, little incentive • Command agriculture irrational, favored larger towns; Ended up importing food by 1980s
Gorbachev’s rural changes • Broke state land monopoly, allowed private leases and withdrawals from state farms • Sell the land? Losing Mir (rural commune) tradition • Fears of food insecurity, new rural elite, lack of training
Results ofrural changes • Millions of private farms (esp. in south) • But state farms/coops keep 75% of land, with more democracy, shareholding, efficiency • Interdependence of old state farms, new private • Some old estates revived in E. Europe; and some corporate agribusiness
Close command industries • Reduce or end subsidies • Pass burden to renters • Privatize industrial economy; • benefit new entrepeneurs • High unemployment, • inflation, inequality “Shock therapy”
Winning regions • Hub regions • - Government/transportation centers. High-tech industries • - Moscow, St. Petersburg, Kiev, Nizhny Novgorod, Urals • Gateway regions • - Outward looking/ trade-oriented • - Vladivostok, Murmansk, Kaliningrad
Losing regionsHuge gaps in prices, income, roads • Command military-industrial / coal regions • State agricultural regions • Remote natural resource (non-oil) • Ethnic minority regions in conflict
Communist vote in 1995 Duma election Agricultural zone; older population. Nationalist zones bordering Muslims, East Asians
Reform party vote in 1995 Duma election Educated urban areas; Mixed industry-agriculture; North, east less serfdom history
Russia’s demographics, 1990-2006 Male Female Effects of war, poor male health
U.S. Baby BoomUSSR instead had “echo busts” slowing growth in 1960s, 1980s EchoBoom Baby Boom (1946-1964) Baby Bust (1965-1980)
Russian life expectancyMen dying from alcohol, drugs, accidents, crime;Male life expectancy now like parts of Third World
Russia’s population decline Population decline for first time since WWII; Worries about aging population, labor shortages; Larger families in Muslim regions but not as many industrial workers