180 likes | 556 Views
Strengthening Early Warning Systems in Europe. Vera Goldschmidt Ferreira National Detached Expert Monitoring and Information Centre European Commission DG ENV A3 Civil Protection Unit http://ec.europa.eu/environment/civil/index.htm. Background. Tsunami disaster of December 2004
E N D
Strengthening Early Warning Systems in Europe Vera Goldschmidt Ferreira National Detached Expert Monitoring and Information Centre European Commission DG ENV A3 Civil Protection Unit http://ec.europa.eu/environment/civil/index.htm
Background • Tsunami disaster of December 2004 • Hyogo Declaration 2005; priorities for action: • “…enhance early warning” • EU Action Plan, Jan 2005 “proposals should cover the establishment of a detection and early warning system for the Indian Ocean, as well as for the Mediterranean and the Atlantic” • UNESCO-IOC • Council Conclusions of 21 Dec. 2006: COM proposals to be presented by July 2007
Hazards and risks in Europe Floods Wind storms Forest fires Seismic risks
Main gaps Tsunamis Tourists Impaired Education
Changing nature of risks • Population growth • Climate change • Mobility • Vulnerability of modern societies
Europe’s need for a tsunami EWS • 10% of all tsunamis happen in the region • Devastating historical tsunamis • Active seismic zones
Europe the only region at risk where no operational EWS is in place for tsunamis • High vulnerability (population density along coastlines, ports, economic assets) • Citizens from all over Europe will be affected • Basic elements already in place (seismic network)
Historical tsunamis in the Atlantic-Mediterranean area Source: Bologna University, Italy
Basic Principles for Further Work • Cross-sectoral • Multi-hazards • Complementarity • Fit into ongoing initiatives (UNESCO IOC)
Main Areas of Action • Risk assessment • Detection systems • Disseminating alerts • Preparedness, education, awareness raising
Risk Assessment • Identification of high risk areas - GMES (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security) • GMES could provide data required for run-up models (e.g. coastal topography) and risk maps, to be shared with all relevant stakeholders through the GMES process.
Risk Assessment • Creating a web-based platform to share data and methodologies for risk assessment • Support workshops to facilitate the elaboration of methodologies for risk assessment (e.g. DG RTD)
Detection Systems • Real time data sharing • Common platform • MoUs and data-sharing protocols • Mainstreaming with Med countries • Member States to install additional detection systems • Tsunami modelling through JRC
Alert Dissemination • Portal to incorporate alert tools • Upgrade MIC IT facilities • Participation of Euro-Med countries • Sub-working group to elaborate proposals for common tsunami warning signals • Multi-national projects - MS • Use other COM opportunities (e.g. regional policy programmes) • Involve Mediterranean countries
Preparedness, Education, Awareness • Capacity building for civil protection authorities • Contacts with tourism associations • Education programmes for local communities in risk areas - MS • Simulation exercises - MS • CPX in 2008 - MIC • Improve sustainable coastal management measures (building codes, land use planning, protective infrastructure) - MS • Mainstreaming with Mediterranean countries (e.g. education, tourism, health sector)
Follow up Next steps 2007/2008 • Implementation of Council Conclusions of Dec. 2006 • Analysis of UNESCO IOC Implementation Plan • Identify possible contributions of MS/ EC • MIC EWS expert group meeting: November • Discussion ProCiv: November • UNESCO-IOC meeting Lisbon: November • Presentation of work plan 2008: 28 November
2nd Second Civil Protection Forum 22-23 November 2007 Session “Raising the Alarm” http://ec.europa.eu/environment/civil/forum2007/index.htm