Dynamics AX vs. Dynamics 365

1. Dynamics AX vs. Dynamics 365 5 Differences Although they're essentially two different versions of an equivalent business solution, there are a couple of key differences between the 2 ERP solutions. For the sake of this post, we'll compare Dynamics AX 2012 to Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations. 1. Infrastructure The biggest difference between Dynamics AX and Dynamics 365 is that the infrastructure the systems are built on. When Microsoft committed to putting cloud technology first when CEO Satya Nadella took over in 2014, they moved the Dynamics products into the cloud, as well. This meant that Microsoft’s cloud service, Azure, would host D365 and the other applications from the Dynamics 365 suite of products. In contrast, Dynamics AX 2012 can still be run on-premise, meaning that customers can host the appliance on their own servers that are physically onsite. Initially, there was some resistance to the cloud-driven model. Organizations were wont to storing their production data locally and having the power to access it at any time. for instance , with an on- premise ecosystem, a supervisor could write a SQL query to look at data in real-time. Customers who had a production environment of AX didn't need a cloud based application, as they might need to request copies of their production database from Microsoft to tug from the cloud.

2. The process for code deployment to production was also changed within the cloud. System administrators could not promote code to production on-demand, and instead, had to schedule a deployment, which Microsoft would do on the customer’s behalf. 2. Custom Development Another key difference between Dynamics AX and D365 is that the method during which custom code is written and implemented. With any ERP implementation, there's sure to be some software configuration or customization needed to satisfy specific business requirements. With Dynamics AX, custom development are often applied using the over-layering method. Over-layering may be a concept that permits the core product, customer code and any value-added reseller (VAR) code to be separated from one another in several layers. the various sets of code are then layered on top of every other within the ERP system. Sometimes, when the code is merged, compatibility issues arise, and developers must adjust their code before it are often deployed. D365 requires the utilization of the extensibility model as against over-layering. this suggests the core code of the ERP system is locked down, not allowing any customizations. Developers must customize the software through built-in extension points. 3. Upgrade Model Upgrading to a more moderen version of Dynamics AX – like AX 2009 to AX 2012 – often requires a replacement implementation. Many AX customers considering an upgrade find that they first got to evaluate the business impact of the upgrade and improve their business processes. this needs a replacement implementation because new processes often require new configurations and/or customizations. Other AX customers see the necessity for a replacement implementation once they realize that their custom code conflicts with the code delivered by Microsoft within the new software version. In these cases, developers must change and sometimes entirely rewrite their customizations. Upgrades from AX 2012 to D365 can typically be avoided a replacement implementation, counting on the quantity of custom code involved. However, upgrades from AX 2009 to D365, require a replacement implementation since there's no direct upgrade path from one to the opposite . 4. interface A very apparent difference between Dynamics AX and D365 is that the interface . With Dynamics AX, a user can launch the appliance from a desktop and perform their work within the program. Dynamics AX has the aesthetic of most ERP systems, which is, to be honest, a touch out of touch with today’s typical ERP user. With D365, a user can launch an internet browser and enter a URL. Within the browser, the user can perform his or her work and open additional tabs if necessary. D365 are often launched from

3. desktops and mobile devices alike – anywhere with an online connection. the design and feel of D365 is more aligned with Microsoft’s branding and matches the design of other Microsoft products, just like the Office 365 suite. In Dynamics AX, the homepage defaults to a neighborhood called Role Centers. Here, users can create custom queues and links that make performing their daily functions easier. 5. Navigation Navigational differences, though minor, are worth noting. A common theme across ERP systems is that certain screens are often launched from several different places within the system. In Dynamics AX, a user must know the menu path to a selected screen. for instance , to make a replacement sales order, a user can navigate to Sales and marketing All sales orders. However, this is often not the sole place to launch the sales order screen, which makes it difficult and time consuming for users to memorize any particular path. For More Information About Dynamics AX Technical Training Click Here Ph No: +91- 9989971070, E-Mail ID: online@visualpath.in