210 likes | 434 Views
Students Names : 1.Georgia Zalti 2. Elizabeth Stavrou 3.Elena Nikolaou. Treaties of EU. The EU member States are 27 A treaty lay out: EU objectives C ontrols for EU institutions D ecisions made R elationship between the EU and its member countries
E N D
Students Names : 1.Georgia Zalti2. Elizabeth Stavrou3.Elena Nikolaou Treaties of EU
The EU member States are 27 • A treaty lay out: • EU objectives • Controls for EU institutions • Decisions made • Relationship between the EU and its member countries • The European Union is based on the rule of law Introduction
Established formally by the Maastricht Treaty 2002 ~ Euro currency Enlargement of EU European Union
Treaty was signed in Paris in 1951 Community of France, Germany, Italy and the Benelux The European Coal and Steel Community
Signed in March 1957 EEC and EURATOM Came into force on 1 January 1958 Treaty of Rome
Commission, Council of Ministers, European Parliament and European Court of Justice • European government bodies What did the Treaty of Rome do:
Arguments for : • Barriers to trade • United peaceful Europe. • European reconciliation and democracy • Arguments Against: • Ignoring the cultural barriers • The Treaty was fundamentally confused Arguments for and against
Signed On February 7, 1992 Came into force on 1 November 1993 Creates the European Union, which consists of three pillars It improved the Treaty of Rome Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and the creation of the Euro. Treaty of Maastricht
The Treaty advanced two broad processes: • The increase of integration and EU responsibilities • The Treaty was seeking to strengthen the EU Parliament's power What did the Maastricht treaty do
Arguments For: • A structure that is capable of coping • The process of closer integration through Monetary Union • The British Government succeeded in including the principle of subsidiarity in the Treaty • Arguments Against: • The increasing measures of the Treaty advanced a federalist model of European integration • The focus on big issues like EMU distracted people from the expansion of EU control Arguments for and against
It was approved by the European Council on 2nd of October 1997 • On 1st May 1999 it came into force • Objectives: • Modify regulations of the Treaty of the European Union Treaty of Amsterdam
Arguments For: • Providing room for some countries to move faster • It made enlargement possible • UK in line with the social agreement of the Maastricht Treaty • Arguments Against: • new flexibility created a two speed Europe Arguments For and Against
Improved competences of the European Parliament , functions of the Court of Auditors , Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions Concept of closer cooperation was introduced in the Treaty of the European Union The reform of the EU institutions:
Signed on 26 February 2001 Came into force on 1 February 2003 Achieved the task that Amsterdam treaty failed to do Treaty of Nice :
Signed on 29 October 2004 by the 25 EU countries Dutch and French rejected Constitutional Treaty Did not come into force European Constitution
Signed by the EU countries on 13 December 2007 and came into force on 1 December 2009 • Includes: • legal entity • The three pillars • A new rule The Treaty of Lisbon
Modified the Maastricht Treaty (1992) Modified the Treaty of Rome (1957) No longer Constitution Treaty
The commission: one commission per member state Before and after the Treaty of Nice (2001) Stabilized European Council New decision making process European Parliament has more strengthen powers How the EU work with Lisbon Treaty
The EU only takes action with the treaties The treaties Initiate the institutions of European Union Over the years the treaties have been improved by other treaties Conclusion