1 / 15

Application of Campaign+ Level Modeling using DMOES for Coast Guard Force Planning

Application of Campaign+ Level Modeling using DMOES for Coast Guard Force Planning. IDS OV-1 – ICGS 2002. Abstract.

bijan
Download Presentation

Application of Campaign+ Level Modeling using DMOES for Coast Guard Force Planning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Application of Campaign+ Level Modeling using DMOES for Coast Guard Force Planning IDS OV-1 – ICGS 2002 MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

  2. Abstract • The Deepwater Maritime Operational Effectiveness Simulation (DMOES) model was developed to support assessment of large scale, integrated “systems of systems” for Coast Guard maritime, multi-mission and military operations. Air, surface, C4ISR and logistics components are tied together with CONOPS and CONLOG to execute Coast Guard missions in response to multiple, concurrent threats and demands. The model has been extended and applied to Coast Guard force planning efforts. • Authors • Patrick J. Ryan. MicroSystems Integration, Inc. • LCDR James Passarelli, United States Coast Guard • Michael Migdail-Smith, MicroSystems Integration, Inc. MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

  3. Maritime Mobility Maritime Security MaritimeSafety Surveillance Detection 2010 1965 Classification 1916 Protection of Natural Resources Identification NationalDefense 1860 Prosecution 1790 COAST GUARD - A NATIONAL ASSET Integrated Multi-Mission Capability… An Enduring Value For America MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

  4. Reduced Maritime Security Risks Output Awareness Prevention Response Protection Enhance Maritime Domain Awareness Create & Oversee Maritime Security Regime Increase Operational Presence/ Enhance Deterrence Improve Response Posture Input Authorities Capabilities Capacity Partnerships MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

  5. Lineage Experience Lessons Learned DM ES Coast Guard Operational Modeling Background MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

  6. Concept of Operations (CONOPS) Assets, Capabilities Mission Demands & Environment MarOpsSim Modeling Operational Effectiveness DMOES Performance Measures MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

  7. Operational Effectiveness System Concept MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

  8. DM ES Application of DMOES to Force Planning MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

  9. Performance Gaps Analysis ’05-’09 Performance Targets Post 9/11 Mission Demands Close The Gap ’98 Performance Targets ’98 Deepwater Performance Proposed Solution Capability / Performance Degrading Legacy Capability/Capacity 1998 2001 2003 2022 2028 (Original Implementation) Years MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

  10. Tracing Mandates to Force Requirements MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

  11. Start Capability & Capacity Assessment Process Domain Teams Populate Flow-Down Process Sheets For 15 Mission Areas Sponsor scrubs Final SPS, determines ORD components, IDs inputs to p-Specs, etc. CROSSWALK Reviewed By IT/Domain Teams to ID Gaps Domain Teams Vet Populated Forms Through Other Teams Capacity Planning Models MEAN DECM BOCCE Domain Teams Generate Initial Capacity Planning Factors IT Preps Side-by-Side CROSSWALK Comparison of SPS & Domain Team Capabilities; Capacity Factors Info Segregated IT Fuses Domain Team Work Products & Performs Scrub to Eliminate Redundancies & Promote Clarity MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

  12. DECM MEAN BOCCE Operational Effectiveness Capacity Determination • Three Models: • DECM • MEAN • BOCCE • DMOES Campaign Analysis - November 2003 MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

  13. + Other Layers Objective + “Bold Goals” Interim + MDA, 2.0 Bering Sea and AI Initial Pre-9/11 Capability + PWCS and AUF Legacy Modeling Scenarios MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

  14. Conclusions/Take Aways • CG Has Limited Force Planning Resources • Challenged to Address Expanding Missions & Increasing Demand For Services • Utilizing System of Systems Approach to Force Structure & Acquisition • M&S Essential to Manage/Measure & Provide Insights into System Tradeoffs • DMOES Is A Robust, Performance-Based Campaign + Model • Supports System of Systems and Aligns With GPRA & PMA Guidelines • Campaign Modeling is Applicable to Force Structure Development & Assessment • Provides CG & Congress Visibility into Performance Level for Investments MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

  15. Authors • Patrick J. Ryan • MicroSystems Integration, Inc. • PatR@msi-ct.com • LCDR James Passarelli • United States Coast Guard, Commandant (G-OCD) • JPassarelli@comdt.uscg.mil • Michael Migdail-Smith • MicroSystems Integration, Inc. • MikeM@msi-ct.com MSI/USCG - Informs 2003 - Atlanta, GA

More Related