1 / 6

SACS Core Requirement 2.12 (The Quality Enhancement Plan)

Quality Enhancement Plan Exploratory Committee Status Update to University Senate November 16, 2010. SACS Core Requirement 2.12 (The Quality Enhancement Plan). The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that

bill
Download Presentation

SACS Core Requirement 2.12 (The Quality Enhancement Plan)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Quality Enhancement PlanExploratory CommitteeStatus Update to University SenateNovember 16, 2010 QEP Exploratory Committee

  2. SACS Core Requirement 2.12(The Quality Enhancement Plan) • The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1) includes a broad-based institutional process identifying key issues emerging from institutional assessment, and (2) focuses on learning outcomes and/or the environment supporting student learning and accomplishing the mission of the institution. QEP Exploratory Committee

  3. Process for Developing the QEP Pre-Planning QEP Exploratory Committee QEP Development One year out Document Due Date Two years out SACS QEP Introduction

  4. QEP Exploratory Committee Roster QEP Exploratory Committee

  5. QEP Exploration Deliverables • Set of 3-4 viable QEP topics to Leadership Team in April 2011 • Must be supportable by research • Must be informed by Auburn assessment results • Must be important for our students • Must be important for the university • Must clearly address student learning (defined as changes in knowledge, skills, behaviors, or values) • Must be implementable with reasonable resources • Must be broadly seen as important and valuable (faculty, students, staff) QEP Exploratory Committee

  6. Current Status • Review institutional assessment data • AU Strategic Plan • National Survey of Student Engagement • Collegiate Learning Assessment • Review of best practices at peer institutions • Develop a broad-based information dissemination plan • Obtain additional input through inclusive campus-wide process • Focus groups • Surveys • Web page with suggestion drop-box • Additional input from students through SGA event QEP Exploratory Committee

More Related