110 likes | 399 Views
Examining the Courageous Project Manager November 6, 2008. Agenda. Background and context (5 minutes) 3 Characteristics of the Courageous Project Manager (10 minutes) How organizations drive away Courageous Project Managers (10 minutes) Questions (5 minutes). Sapient Company Information.
E N D
Examining the Courageous Project Manager November 6, 2008
Agenda • Background and context (5 minutes) • 3 Characteristics of the Courageous Project Manager (10 minutes) • How organizations drive away Courageous Project Managers (10 minutes) • Questions (5 minutes)
Sapient Company Information In 1990, we founded Sapient on a single promise – To do whatever it takes to deliver the right business results, on time and on budget. To deliver on that promise “We leverage a unique approach, breakthrough thinking, and disciplined execution.” Sapient Today • 6200+ people • 23 offices worldwide (13 North America, 7 Europe, 3 Asia) • 2007 revenue of $546M • 2007 highest client win rates in history • 35% year over year service revenue growth rate • Two groups: Interactive and Consulting • Engagement success rate nearly 3x industry average
SapientConsulting • Business & IT Strategy • Business Applications • Business Intelligence • Package Implementation • Outsourcing • SapientInteractive • Interactive Marketing & Creative Services • Web Design & Interactive Development • Media Planning, Buying and Optimization • Marketing Technologies • Strategic Planning and Marketing Analytics Sapient is a global services firm that finds opportunities for clients at the intersection of business, marketing and technology.
Transparency • Courageous Project Managers (CPM) practice near* complete transparency with stakeholders, team members, and the organization at large • CPMs understand transparency can be painful but that it reduces barriers to communication, builds trust, and accelerates consensus building & decision making
Good versus Evil – Knowing what is good and doing it • Most IT managers we see understand what they should be doing and choose*, or are compelled, to do the wrong thing • CPMs focus on: • Setting expectations that requirements will change, problems will occur, and that to be successful stakeholders have to commit • Investing time upfront to setup the project or program for success • Quality is something that is practiced every day and not done at the end (or not at all) • Delivering software quickly and iteratively, at high quality, and with frequent changes is possible if you zealously focus on the basics, but impossible if you don’t In a recent survey CIOs were asked, “What is the Perceived Importance of Software Quality Assurance (SQA) in Your Organization?” – Only 29% said it was part of their fundamental processes – Even worse 40% said it was a nice to have or that it didn’t have a defined importance
Failing Fast • Not all projects or programs get approved based on a valid set of assumptions or workable business case • The courageous project manager knows that: • Their project may be a loser • They must vocally advocate the project be cancelled as soon as the last reasonable chance for success has pasted • If their project is destined to fail the organization must find out as quickly as possible in order to minimize the investment lost • A healthy trend to see in a maturing organization is an increase in the number of projects cancelled but the investment lost per cancelled project shrinking significantly
How organizations drive away CPMs • Lack of emotional maturity • How does an organization take bad news or setbacks? • How many projects get cancelled? Is there always a negative stigma attached to the people associated with cancelled projects? • Is complete transparency something that stakeholders can stomach? • Organizing people and projects into functional silos • Analysts pass it to Architects who pass it to Developers who pass it to Testers • Taking on too many projects • People split their time between 3, 4, or more projects. Work in progress swells, productivity drops • Perpetuates “loser” projects – project cancelation comes too slowly or not at all • Acceptance of mediocrity – what is an organization willing to tolerate?