180 likes | 503 Views
Auto-suture device for nasal surgery. Client: Dr. Benjamin Marcus Department of Otolaryngology Advisor: Professor Tyler Mark Yarmarkovich~Leader Joseph Cabelka~Communicator Jennifer Wager~BSAC Therese Rollmann~BWIG. Problem Statement.
E N D
Auto-suture device for nasal surgery Client: Dr. Benjamin Marcus Department of Otolaryngology Advisor: Professor Tyler Mark Yarmarkovich~Leader Joseph Cabelka~Communicator Jennifer Wager~BSAC Therese Rollmann~BWIG
Problem Statement • Develop device to reduce suturing process in nasal surgery (septoplasty) • Reduce OR costs ($60/min) • The device should mimic the procedure currently used by the surgeon
Design Constraints • Reduce suturing time (less than 10 minutes) • Autoclavable or one-time use • Dimensions must conform to the nose • Cost up to $300 for disposable, $1500 for multiple use
Background: Nose • Septum: cartilage dividing nose into two chambers; 3-5 mm wide • Cartilage Young’s Modulus=10MPa • Mucous membrane lining each side of septum • Nostril width: 10mm-15mm • Flexible
Background: Septoplasty • Deviated septum • Septum is severely shifted from midline • Causes difficulty breathing, sleeping
Background: Septoplasty • Incision made to expose caudal end of septum • Cartilage excised to prevent overriding • Cartilage swung into alignment
Background: Suture • Sutures • Close incision • Strong, non-toxic polymer fiber • Absorbable • Purse-string suture pattern • Continuous • Circular • Inverting
Current Device • Autosuture devices currently available for bowel surgery • Large scale • Endostitch • Automatic Needle Passer
Materials • Autoclavable or one-time use • Light weight and easy to handle • Durable if multiple use
Design I: Mechanical Needle Passer • Needle passed with pulley system • Locked into place by notched edges
Pros Mimics procedure Manipulated by surgeon Adjustable number of sutures Cons Many small parts Difficult to manufacture Difficult to autoclave Requires dexterity Design I: Mechanical Needle Passer
Design II: Clamp • Clamped on either side of the septum • Suture is manually inserted through raised septum
Pros Easy to manufacture Can be disposable Safe Cons Not adjustable to size of nose Not automatic Design II
Design III: Magnetic Needle Passer • Magnetic field generated by coils secures needle • Switch controls magnetic field activation
Pros Simple mechanism Easy to manipulate Mimics procedure Adjustable number of sutures Cons Magnetic field must generate sufficient force to hold the needle in place Size Design III: Magnetic Needle Passer
Future Work • Discuss design options with client • Build prototype • Test device for suture time and ease of use
References • Autosuture. 29 January 2007<http://www.autosuture.com>. • Azom. 6 March 2007<http://www.azom.com/details.asp?ArticleID=1141>. • Cornell. 27 February 2007<http://www.mae.cornell.edu/PDF/mcv3/JB.36.1069.pdf>. • Fact Sheet. 2 March 2007.<http://www.entnet.org/healthinfo/sinus/deviated-septum.cfm>. • Kortenbach, Juergen Andrew . “Automatic needle-passer suturing instrument .” Patent no. 5,814,054. 1998. • Lore, John. An Atlas of Head and Neck Surgery. 1988:Philadelphia. • Modern Plastics. 6 March 2007<http://www.modernplastics.com/april05/wdtubing.html>. • Septoplasty. 27 February 2007<http://emedicine.com/ent/topic128.htm>. • Septum. 7 March 2007 <http://z.about.com/d/p/440/e/f/7166.jpg>.