1 / 44

Trends in ESRD Patient Distribution & Geographic Variations

Analyzing incident and prevalent ESRD patient counts by modality, payor, and network, examining geographic variations in rates for hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and transplant between 1999-2000.

bissette
Download Presentation

Trends in ESRD Patient Distribution & Geographic Variations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Patient counts, by data sourcetable 3.a

  2. Incident patients, by modality & data sourcefigure 3.1, incident ESRD patients, 2000

  3. Prevalent patients, by modality & data sourcefigure 3.2, December 31 point prevalent patients, by data source

  4. Trends in incident countsfigure 3.3

  5. Trends in incident countsfigure 3.3 (cont.)

  6. Incident counts, by data sourcetable 3.b, incident ESRD patients

  7. Percent distribution of incident patients, by first modality (row percent)table 3.c, incident ESRD patients, 1998-2000 combined

  8. Percent distribution of incident patients, by first modality (row percent)table 3.c, incident ESRD patients, 1998-2000 combined (cont.)

  9. Incident patient distribution, by modality & ESRD networktable 3.d, incident ESRD patients, 1998-2000 combined

  10. Incident patients by initial modality, by ESRD networkfigure 3.4, incident ESRD patients, 2000

  11. Incident patients, by modality & payorfigure 3.5, incident ESRD patients, 2000

  12. Incident patients, by modality & payorfigure 3.5, incident ESRD patients, 2000 (cont.)

  13. Incident patients, by modality, payor, & ESRD networkfigure 3.6, incident ESRD patients, 2000

  14. Incident patients, by modality, payor, & ESRD networkfigure 3.6, incident ESRD patients, 2000 (cont.)

  15. Geographic variations in incident rates:hemodialysisfigure 3.7, incident ESRD patients, 1999-2000 combined, by HSA, unadjusted Rate per million population 348+ (432) 280 to <348 237 to <280 194 to <237 below 194 (163)

  16. Geographic variations in incident rates:peritoneal dialysisfigure 3.7, incident ESRD patients, 1999-2000 combined, by HSA, unadjusted Rate per million population 36.7+ (53.3) 29.1 to <36.7 22.9 to <29.1 17.3 to <22.9 below 17.3 (13.8)

  17. Geographic variations in incident rates:transplantfigure 3.7, incident ESRD patients, 1999-2000 combined, by HSA, unadjusted Rate per million population 7.59+ (9.89) 6.13 to <7.59 5.33 to <6.13 4.67 to <5.33 below 4.67 (4.10)

  18. Trends in prevalent countsfigure 3.8, December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients

  19. Trends in prevalent countsfigure 3.8, December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients (cont.)

  20. Prevalent counts, by data sourcetable 3.e, December 31 point prevalent dialysis patients

  21. Percent distribution of prevalent patients, by modality (row percent)table 3.f, December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients, 2000

  22. Percent distribution of prevalent patients, by modality (row percent)table 3.f, December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients, 2000 (cont.)

  23. Prevalent patient distribution, by modality & ESRD networktable 3.g, December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients, 1998-2000 combined

  24. Prevalent patients by initial modality, by ESRD networkfigure 3.9, December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients, 2000

  25. Prevalent patients, by modality & payorfigure 3.10, December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients

  26. Prevalent patients, by modality & payorfigure 3.10, December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients (cont.)

  27. Prevalent patients, by modality, payor, & networkfigure 3.11, December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients, 2000

  28. Prevalent patients, by modality, payor, & networkfigure 3.11, December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients, 2000 (cont.)

  29. Geographic variations in prevalent rates:hemodialysisfigure 3.12, December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients, 2000, by HSA, unadjusted Rate per million population 1,030+ (1,400) 790 to <1,030 640 to <790 520 to <640 below 520 (430)

  30. Geographic variations in prevalent rates:peritoneal dialysisfigure 3.12, December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients, 2000, by HSA, unadjusted Rate per million population 119.7+ (161.2) 91.4 to <119.7 73.8 to <91.4 56.5 to <73.8 below 56.5 (44.9)

  31. Geographic variations in prevalent rates:transplantfigure 3.12, December 31 point prevalent ESRD patients, 2000, by HSA, unadjusted Rate per million population 400+ (467) 364 to <400 335 to <364 308 to <335 below 308 (287)

  32. Incident patient distribution, by modality & profit statusfigure 3.13, incident ESRD patients

  33. Incident patient distribution, by modality & unit affiliationfigure 3.14, incident ESRD patients

  34. Geographic variations in incident rates:hemodialysis, for-profitfigure 3.15, incident ESRD patients, 1999-2000 combined, by HSA, unadjusted Rate per million population 207.7+ (270.8) 143.5 to <207.7 88.0 to <143.5 39.6 to <88.0 below 39.6 (20.7)

  35. Geographic variations in incident rates:peritoneal dialysis, for-profitfigure 3.15, incident ESRD patients, 1999-2000 combined, by HSA, unadjusted Rate per million population 26.3+ (42.1) 18.3 to <26.3 11.6 to <18.3 6.1 to <11.6 below 6.1 (3.5)

  36. Geographic variations in incident rates:hemodialysis, non-profitfigure 3.15, incident ESRD patients, 1999-2000 combined, by HSA, unadjusted Rate per million population 133.2+ (193.9) 73.9 to <133.2 34.4 to <73.9 16.5 to <34.4 below 16.5 (10.5)

  37. Geographic variations in incident rates:peritoneal dialysis, for-profitfigure 3.15, incident ESRD patients, 1999-2000 combined, by HSA, unadjusted Rate per million population 11.48+ (22.10) 6.17 to <11.48) 3.75 to <6.17 2.28 to <3.75 below 2.28 (1.47)

  38. Prevalent patient distribution, by modality & profit statusfigure 3.16, December 31 point prevalent patients

  39. Prevalent patient distribution, by modality & unit affiliationfigure 3.17, December 31 point prevalent patients

  40. Geographic variations in prevalent rates:hemodialysis, for-profitfigure 3.18, December 31 point prevalent patients, 2000, by HSA, unadjusted Rate per million population 848+ (1,233) 595 to <848 386 to <595 162 to <386 below 162 (69)

  41. Geographic variations in prevalent rates:peritoneal dialysis, for-profitfigure 3.18, December 31 point prevalent patients, 2000, by HSA, unadjusted Rate per million population 92.8+ (142.0) 61.3 to <92.8 39.7 to <61.3 18.7 to <39.7 below 18.7 (10.5)

  42. Geographic variations in prevalent rates:hemodialysis, non-profitfigure 3.18, December 31 point prevalent patients, 2000, by HSA, unadjusted Rate per million population 306.9+ (51.9) 89.7 to <306.9 36.1 to <89.7 16.0 to <36.1 below 16.0 (9.4)

  43. Geographic variations in prevalent rates:peritoneal dialysis, for-profitfigure 3.18, December 31 point prevalent patients, 2000, by HSA, unadjusted Rate per million population 28.5+ (58.4) 12.5 to <28.5 6.7 to <12.5 4.1 to <6.7 below 4.1 (2.7)

  44. Patients transplanted, by unit affiliationfigure 3.19, period prevalent dialysis patients, 2000

More Related