1 / 19

The g2p Experiment

The g2p Experiment. E08-027/007 Collaboration meeting. K. Slifer, UNH Sept. 30, 2010. Inclusive Scattering. p’. p. Construct the most general Tensor W consistent with Lorentz and gauge invariance. q. W. P. Inclusive Polarized Cross Section. SFs parameterize everything

bjorn
Download Presentation

The g2p Experiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The g2p Experiment E08-027/007 Collaboration meeting K. Slifer, UNH Sept. 30, 2010

  2. Inclusive Scattering p’ p Construct the most general Tensor W consistent with Lorentz and gauge invariance q W P Inclusive Polarized Cross Section SFs parameterize everything we don’t know about hadron vertex

  3. E08-027 : Proton g2 Structure Function Fundamental spin observable has never been measured at low or moderate Q2 A- rating by PAC33 Camsonne, Crabb, Chen, Slifer* • BC Sum Rule : violation suggested for proton at large Q2,but found satisfied for the neutron & 3He. • Spin Polarizability: Major failure (>8s) of PT for neutron dLT. Need g2 isospinseparation to solve. • Hydrogen HyperFine Splitting : Lack of knowledge of g2 at low Q2 is one of the leading uncertainties. • Proton Charge Radius : also one of the leading uncertainties in extraction of <Rp> from m-H Lamb shift.

  4. E08-027 : Proton g2 Structure Function Fundamental spin observable has never been measured at low or moderate Q2 A- rating by PAC33 Camsonne, Crabb, Chen, Slifer* • BC Sum Rule : violation suggested for proton at large Q2,but found satisfied for the neutron & 3He. • Spin Polarizability: Major failure (>8s) of PT for neutron dLT. Need g2 isospinseparation to solve. • Hydrogen HyperFine Splitting : Lack of knowledge of g2 at low Q2 is one of the leading uncertainties. • Proton Charge Radius : also one of the leading uncertainties in extraction of <Rp> from m-H Lamb shift. BC Sum Rule

  5. E08-027 : Proton g2 Structure Function Fundamental spin observable has never been measured at low or moderate Q2 A- rating by PAC33 Camsonne, Crabb, Chen, Slifer* • BC Sum Rule : violation suggested for proton at large Q2,but found satisfied for the neutron & 3He. • Spin Polarizability: Major failure (>8s) of PT for neutron dLT. Need g2 isospinseparation to solve. • Hydrogen HyperFine Splitting : Lack of knowledge of g2 at low Q2 is one of the leading uncertainties. • Proton Charge Radius : also one of the leading uncertainties in extraction of <Rp> from m-H Lamb shift. BC Sum Rule Spin Polarizability LT

  6. E08-027 : Proton g2 Structure Function Fundamental spin observable has never been measured at low or moderate Q2 A- rating by PAC33 Camsonne, Crabb, Chen, Slifer* • BC Sum Rule : violation suggested for proton at large Q2,but found satisfied for the neutron & 3He. • Spin Polarizability: Major failure (>8s) of PT for neutron dLT. Need g2 isospinseparation to solve. • Hydrogen HyperFine Splitting : Lack of knowledge of g2 at low Q2 is one of the leading uncertainties. • Proton Charge Radius : also one of the leading uncertainties in extraction of <Rp> from m-H Lamb shift. The finite size of the nucleon (QCD) plays a small but significant role in calculating atomic energy levels in QED. nucleus ≈ 10-15 Atom ≈ 10-10

  7. Proton Charge Radius from mP lamb shift disagrees with eP scattering result by about 6% <Rp> = 0.84184 ± 0.00067 fm Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen <Rp> = 0.897 ± 0.018 fm World analysis of eP scattering <Rp> = 0.8768 ± 0.0069 fm CODATA world average R. Pohl et.alNature, July 2010 I. Sick PLB, 2003

  8. Proton Charge Radius from mP lamb shift disagrees with eP scattering result by about 6% <Rp> = 0.84184 ± 0.00067 fm Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen <Rp> = 0.897 ± 0.018 fm World analysis of eP scattering <Rp> = 0.8768 ± 0.0069 fm CODATA world average R. Pohl et.alNature, July 2010 I. Sick PLB, 2003 Possible Implications : Some experimental mistake ? Fairly straightforward spectroscopy. Rydberg constant off by 5s ? Really unlikely. We don’t know how to calculate in QED ? Missing some terms? Something about muons we don’t understand ? Underestimating finite size effect uncertainties?

  9. Proton Charge Radius from mP lamb shift disagrees with eP scattering result by about 6% <Rp> = 0.84184 ± 0.00067 fm Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen <Rp> = 0.897 ± 0.018 fm World analysis of eP scattering <Rp> = 0.8768 ± 0.0069 fm CODATA world average R. Pohl et.alNature, July 2010 I. Sick PLB, 2003 I. Sick (Basel) : “What gives? I don’t know”. “Serious discrepency” [ELBA XI, Nature.com] C. Carlson (W&M) : “Something is missing, this is very clear.” [Nature.com] P. Mohr (NIST) : “would be quite revolutionary.” [L.A. Times.] B. Odom (N.Western) : “...very surprised to find strong disagreement.” [N.P.R.] J. Flowers (N.P.L.) “...could mean a complete rethink of QED”. [National Geographic] “...opens door for a theorist to come up with next[NY Times] theoretical leap, and claim their Nobel prize”.

  10. Polarizability : Integrals of g1 and g2 weighted by 1/Q4 Zemach radius : Integral of GEGM weighted by 1/Q2 Dominated by Kinematic region of E08-027 and E08-007

  11. E08-027 : Status Update • Polarized Solid Ammonia Target. • Magnetic Chicane/Beamline modifications. • Room temp Septa Magnets. • Low current BCM/BPMs. • Expensive. End of Year funding from DOE + user financial contributions will • make possible, but we’ll be on a very tight budget. • Tight Schedule : Start installation in May 2011.

  12. E08-027 : Status Update • Polarized Solid Ammonia Target. • Magnetic Chicane/Beamline modifications. • Room temp Septa Magnets. • Low current BCM/BPMs. • Expensive. End of Year funding from DOE + user financial contributions will • make possible, but we’ll be on a very tight budget. • Tight Schedule : Start installation in May 2011. • Nevertheless, These are good problems to have! Thanks to all who worked tirelessly to make sure these two experiments stayed on the schedule

  13. Backups

  14. E08-027: Measurment of g2p and the LT spin polarizability  Measure fundamental (but relatively unknown) spin observable g2 for 0.015<Q2<0.35 GeV2. Provide benchmark test of cPT, via the forward spin polarizability dLT which will help resolve a major failure (8s) of existing state-of-the-art dLT calculations. Provide data needed for test of the BC sum rule. Reduce major uncertainty in Hydrogen Hyper Fine splitting. HHF experimentally known to 13 sigfigs, but only calculable to 6 sigfigs (a few ppm). The largest error comes from finite proton size corrections. Breakdown: -41.0±0.5 ppm from elastic (Zemach) contribution. 1.45±0.2 ppm from inelastic F2 and g1. 0.13+-0.13 ppm from g2, assuming Hall B model but no data at low Q2 and none of the available g2 models are favored by the existing data. g2 contribution to the HHF could be as large as 0.5±0.5ppm if we assume the Maid model which reproduces the existing data pretty well. -

  15. 147-162 K in confirmed user contributions (as of June 24) Argonne: 10K parts or machining. + 2 tech staff that can help with design work. Rutgers: 25-30K machining in Rutgers shop (CNC available). Tel Aviv: 10-20K machining of beamline components. Temple: 10K in beamline parts or machining. UVa: 60K in target magnet repairs at Oxford. 5K to repair target refrigerator. UVa(2) : 10K in machining and parts (+tungsten beam dump). UNH: 10K in parts or machining. 2K in target stick repair. William&Mary: 5K in parts or machining + manpower. Additional anticipated contributions UNH: 20K supplemental request for parts/machining. Spokesman Guy Ron will move from post-doc to faculty position with associated startup funding within the next few months.

  16. Applications to Atomic Physics Hydrogen HF Splitting nucleus ≈ 10-15 Atom ≈ 10-10 ≈1ppm ≈5ppm <1ppm ≈40ppm The finite size of the nucleus plays a small but significant role in atomic energy levels. Friar & Sick PLB 579 285(2003)

  17. Structure dependence of Hydrogen HF Splitting Nazaryan,Carlson,Griffieon PRL 96 163001 (2006) Elastic Scattering Inelastic DZ=-41.0±0.5ppm Dpol≈ 1.3±0.3 ppm Elastic piece larger but with similar uncertainty 0.2265 ppm D1 well determined from F2,g1 data D2 Not well determined at all, assumed small. If assume Maid Model instead of Eg1 model, the uncertainty on g2 would be 2X uncertainty from g1

More Related