130 likes | 141 Views
DOE Review of the LCLS Project. Project Risk and Contingency Assessment M. Reichanadter / SLAC. Project Status. TEC > 34% Complete, Contingency $44,773K, 24.7% on remaining work Re-estimate cost & schedule for remaining work Contingency assessed at ~19.6% on remaining work
E N D
DOE Review of the LCLS Project Project Risk and Contingency Assessment M. Reichanadter / SLAC
Project Status • TEC > 34% Complete, • Contingency $44,773K, 24.7% on remaining work • Re-estimate cost & schedule for remaining work • Contingency assessed at ~19.6% on remaining work • 24.5% technical, 15.5% civil • Technical design specs are advancing • PRD’s, ESD’s, ICD’s ~complete for E-Beam • Civil Construction is underway • Title II design complete, IFC drawings stable • T3 CA familiar with design, CM/GC in Phase II of contract • Procurements are well-advanced • ~76% complete, under contract or bids in hand • Installation & commission is mostly ahead • Installing Injector, commission in March 2007
Project Risks • Technical Systems Risks • Remaining procurements (~$44M) • Photon system design, Interface with LUSI • Technical challenges • Vacuum Chamber, BPM’s, Mirrors, Alignment, etc. • Conventional Facilities Risks • Construction Safety • Post-Award Contingency Usage • Integration & Installation • Gaps in scope, Hardware not ready for Install • Staying to schedule • Integration with Lab, Controls • Transition into Operations
Remaining Procurements >$500K • LCLS has had good experience on technical LLP procurements • Final call for APP >$100K in Nov06, combine install contracts
LCLS Technical Specifications • Photon Systems beginning to finalize its design specs • QA Mgr working monitoring dates for PRD’s and ESD’s • Setting up Group to manage LCLS-LUSI Interface
LCLS Design Review Process • LCLS conducted ~50 design reviews in the past six months. • Advances the design, vets solutions, identifies integration issues early • Design process will provide rapid advance of photon specifications. • Set up Task Force for high risk technical challenges (undulator vacuum chamber)
Construction Safety • DOE, SLAC, Turner safety staff in place. • Safety Processes in Progress • Emergency / Crisis Management Coordination • Tunnel Rescue Training • Safe Performance Observations • Injector Safety Assessment Document • Fire Hazards Analysis
DOE Stanford Site Office Inspections Regular UTR and PM oversight of contracted work in progress LCLS Facility Safety Compliance Inspections LCLS Management Safe Performance Observations
Post-Award Contingency • California Department of General Services adds 5% contingency for post-award errors, omissions and site conditions. • Construction Industry Institute recommend 2-3% post-award for errors and omissions.
Recent DOE Civil Construction Experience • LCLS “Owner” Changes are anticipated to be small. • Design is stable. Scope is ~fixed. • LCLS will carry a larger contingency ~15%) due to tunneling component. SNS – Errors, Omissions & Site Conditions – 5.7% SNS – Owner Directed Changes - ~18.0%
Integration & Installation • Integration Management Team to facilitate installation tasks • Directed by RM Boyce (staff of 6) • Review and ownership of ICD’s, Gaps, Conflicts • CF-Tech leads for construction • Installation readiness & planning • FY07 shutdown & LCLS equipment installation will be a challenge • Setup stand-alone detailed schedules • L4, Hardware RFI milestones consistent with P3 • Track in weekly status meetings • Group installation contracts to allow work flexibility
Controls, Commissioning & Endgame • Hamid Shoaee named head of SLAC Controls • Facilitate integration of SLAC & LCLS Controls • SLAC ASD to assist in commissioning the Injector and transition to operations • Laser operations to transition to ASD ops • FY09 management reserve to provide flexibility in endgame. • Can buy power, services or labor.
Summary • Contingency is adequate to address the project’s risks for this stage of the project. • Project risks are evaluated monthly at the tactical level in the LCLS Risk Registry. • Available contingency will be reevaluated on a monthly basis to ensure LCLS can deliver on its commitments to the DOE. • Programmatic space is an issue. Decision date Oct07. • LCLS is a success when it is well integrated with LUSI. • LCLS-LUSI integration group will play an important role.