370 likes | 651 Views
Immune dysfunction and s epsis in a cute on chronic liver failure. Dr Harry Antoniades MRC Clinician Scientist & Senior Lecturer in Hepatology. What is the scale of the problem ?.
E N D
Immune dysfunction and sepsis in acute on chronic liver failure Dr Harry Antoniades MRC Clinician Scientist & Senior Lecturer in Hepatology
What is the scale of the problem ? “An 88% rise in age-standardised mortality from chronic liver disease, the only one of the major diseases which is still increasing, of which alcohol-related liver disease is one of the primary causes, along with viral hepatitis. Cirrhosis deaths are rising in England while falling in most other EU countries” NCEPOD report; Atlas for liver care for England; March ’13 Source; National Statistics 2007 Leon et al Lancet ‘06
Acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) • Definition • Acute deterioration of pre-existing, chronic liver disease, usually related to a precipitating event and associated with increased mortality at 3 months due to multi-system organ failure. EASL-AASLD consensus Olson et al., Hepatology 2011 • CANONIC study - defining ACLF grades according to organ failure & mortality • - multicentre trial, including1443 patients with acute decompensationMoreau et al., Gastroenterology 2013 * Creatinine 132 μmol/L
Background - ACLF vs. decompensated cirrhosis • Characteristics of ACLF • previously good or stable liver function • acute deterioration over a short period • induced by a precipitating event • resulting in organ failure and high risk of death • potentially reversible Jalan et al., J Hepatol, 2012
Background - ACLF vs. decompensated cirrhosis • precipitating events: • infection • GI bleeding • surgery / trauma • alcoholic hepatitis, PVT, ... Jalan et al., J Hepatol, 2012 • Characteristics of ACLF • previously good or stable liver function • acute deterioration over a short period • induced by a precipitating event • resulting in organ failure and high risk of death & potentially reversible
Admissions for organ support in cirrhosis: “ACLF” ICU series of consecutive patients • n=143 Hepatology 2001:34;255-61 • n=420 Chest 2004;126;1598-03 • n=312 Ali Pharm Ther 2006:23;883-93 • n=111 J ClinGast 2003;37:251-7 Welch et al J Health Science Research & Policy 2008;13S2:40-44
ACLF in ICU; Prognosis Study Year n Mortality Zimmerman et al 1996 117 63% Hepatology 1996;23:193-1401 Zauner et al 1996 198 52% ICM 1996;22:559-63 Wehler et al 2001 143 46% Hepatology 2001;34:255-61 Aggarawal et al 2001 582 49% Chest 2001;119:1489-97 Tsai et al 2003 111 65% J Clin Gastro;37:251-257 Arabi et al 2004 129 74% E J Gastro Hep 2004;16(3):333-9 Gildea et al 2004 420 44% Chest 2004;96(4):1232-6 Cholongitas et al2006 312 65% Alim Pharm Ther 2006;23:883-893 Fang et al 2008 111 81% Neph Dial Trans 2008;23(6):1961-9 Junea et al 2009 104 42% J Crit Care 2009;24(3):387-93
Sepsis in cirrhosis • Bacterial infections in cirrhosis: • leading cause morbidity/mortality in cirrhosis • 15-35% of hospitalised cirrhotic patients vs 5-7% general population (Verbake et al; Crit Care ‘11) • 50% mortality rate increase patients with sepsis* • increased susceptibility to secondary infections • increased frequency of extra-hepatic organ failure & requirement for organ support • Delisting from listing transplant *Bajaj et al; Hepatology’12 ‘14; Karvellas et al; Crit Care Med ‘10 ; Moreau et al, Gastro ‘13
Infections in cirrhosis and ACLF • Frequency • hospitalised cirrhotic patients - 32-34% • hospitalised cirrhotic patients with GI bleeding - 45% • vs. hospitalised patients overall 5-7% • Sites of first infections • SBP - 22-25% • UTI - 20-28% • pneumonia – 8-15% 4. Gut infections • Pathogens • gram-negative (E. coli, Klebsiellaspp) • gram-positive (Streptococcus pneumonia, Staphyloccocusaureus) • Fungi • C Difficile Tandon, Sem Liver Disease, 2008 Borzio et al., Dig Liver Dis, 2001 Moreau et al; Gastro ‘13 Baja et al, Hepatology ‘12 Moreau et al, Gastro ‘13 FernándezJ et al., Hepatology’02 Karvellas et al; Crit Care Med ‘10 Bonnel et al., Clin Gastro Hepatol’11 Baja et al; Hepatology ‘12
ACLF precipitating factors: Infection • Common in ACLF 40-50% hospital admissions of cirrhotics 20-40% develop nosocomial infections SIRS criteria for sepsis unreliable in cirrhotic patients (present in 57-70% infected patients) Infection confers poor outcome Levesque E et al. J Hepatology 2012, n = 377
Infection & variceal bleeding • High incidence of infections in cirrhotics with variceal bleeding (20% at admission; 50% during first few days) • Meta-analysis reduction in infection (45% vs 14%) and mortality (24% vs 15%) with antibiotic prophylaxis (Bernard et al, Hepatology‘99) • Infection is associated with failure to control bleeding & variceal re-bleeding (Goulis et al Lancet 1999; Hou et al Hepatology ‘04) • Antibiotic prophylaxis associated lower incidence early variceal re-bleeding (Hou et al, Hepatology‘04) • Cochrane analysis : evidence base for antibiotics 8 trials (864 cases) Significant decrease mortality (RR 0.73) and incidence of bacterial infection (RR 0.4)
Infection and Alcoholic Hepatitis: • >50% AH develop sepsis during admission • Mechanisms conferring susceptibility largely unknown • Infection increases mortality in AH Louvet et al. Gastroenterology 2009
ACLF: Renal failure • Most data extrapolated from advanced cirrhotics; • Emerging data in ACLF • Causes: multifactorial Infection (46%) Hypovoloameia (32%) HRS (13%) Parenchymal nephropathy (9%) Drug-induced (7.5%) Creatinine >133 n=562 Martin-Llahi et al, Gastro ‘11
Infection triggers development of organ failure & ACLF • 35% with proven infection required organ support (n=507) • Infection triggered organ failure (ACLF) increased mortality rate • Independent predictors of 30-day survival • Admission MELD score • Low albumin • Infection triggered organ failure (>2) • High WCC/CRP • Secondary/recurrent infections Liver dysfunction SIRS responses Immune dysfunction/ immunosuppression Bajaj et al; Hepatology’12 & Hepatology ‘14
Secondary infections in ACLF confers poor outcome • Secondary infections: • 28% hospitalised patients • Associated wit high mortality (53% vs 20%) & independent of admission MELD • Commoner in patients with MODS/shock • Associated with noscomial first infection Predictors of 30-day survival Bajaj et al; Hepatology ‘12
SIRS confers poor outcome in cirrhotics irrespective of infection 0-1 2 3-4 Culture +vein 40 and 42% survivors vs non-survivors Cazzaninga et al; J Hep 2009 Shawrcross et al; J Hep 2011
Infection, SIRS and cirrhosis • 30-50% infections remain “culture negative” in cirrhosis • Patients with decompensated liver disease exhibit “partial SIRS responses” • SIRS in cirrhosis is “atypical”: • Reduced baseline PMN count • Elevated baseline HR (hyperdynamic circulation) • Baseline hyperventilation due to encephalopathy • Blunted elevation in body temperature • SIRS criteria and biomarkers (e.g. CRP, procalcitonin) DO NOT differentiate infectious vs non-infectious driven SIRS
Pathophysiology • Not fully understood • Important to understand to allow for best interventions and improve prognosis • Multisystem disorder • Hepatic - reduction in liver synthetic function, raised bilirubin - histologically: cell death, loss of cellular actin - raised portal pressures (especially in sepsis, AH) • Baseline hyperdynamic circulation with effective intravascular depletion • Activation of R-A-A/ADH • Gut-liver axis dysfunction & bacterial translocation • Hepatic and peripheral Immune dysfunction
Pathophysiology: Gut-liver-systemic axis dysfunction Selvapatt et al, Intensive Care Medicine ; In press
Bacterial translocation: a pathogenic factor in development of sepsis • Migration of viable microorganisms from gut lumen to mesenteric lymph nodes & extra-intestinal sites • Pathogenic mechanism of “culture-negative” sepsis (30-50%) • SBP and other infections • Activation of innate immune & systemic inflammatory responses • Circulatory bacterial DNA is a biomarker for translocation of bacteria in cirrhosis Verbake et al; Crit Care ‘11. Bellot et al; LivInt ‘12
Bacterial translocation in cirrhosis • Prevalence of circulating bacterial DNA with severity of liver disease : • Child’s A: 3.8% • Child’s B: 8% • Child’s C: 30% • Positive ascitic and peripheral bact DNA associated with worse outcome in culture negative decompensated liver disease • Child-Pugh score more predictive of presence of bact DNA vs portal hypertension • Associated with circulatory dysfunction/↑ intrahepatic resistance • Bact DNA+: low MAP, SVR, ↑ pro-inflammatory cytokines, PRA renal dysfunction (Frances et al Hepatology ‘08; Bellot et al Hepatology) Cirera et al; J Hep’01 Such et al; Hepatology ‘02 Zapater et al; Hepatology ‘08
Bacterial translocation in ACLF –King’s College cohort • n-=20, preliminary cohort ACLF • Overall MR 50% • Median MELD: 24 • Median SOFA: 14.5 • Only 1/20 culture-positive • All on broad spectrum antimicrobials Patel et al, unpublished data
liver Immune dysfunction: failure of hepatic clearance of pathogens pathogens • Multiple postulated mechanisms: • Immunological: • - Kupffer cell activation & RES dysfunction • & reduced bacterial clearance • - Sequestration/recruitment of immune cells • - Opsonisation deficiency (complement) • - albumin production – increased NO, LPS, reduced PGE2 binding • Anatomical: • Static : porto-systemic shunting • Dynamic: sinusoidal endothelial dysfunction (intrahepatic resistance) shunting RES bacterial products gut - bacterial flora - gut permeability - local immune response Verbake et al; Crit Care ‘11; Selvapatt et al; Intensive Care Med, In press; O’Brien et al Nat Med ‘14
Impaired systemic immune responses: mechanism for secondary/recurrent infections? Bonnel et al., Clin Gastro Hepatol, 2011
Immune dysfunction in ACLF I • Lymphocytes: • Numerical reducation in CD4+, CD8+ • Expansion suppressive T regulatory cells • Polymorphonuclear leukocytes: • Abnormalities in neutrophil adherence • Impaired chemotaxis of white cells • Impaired phagocytosis and intracellular killing by neutrophils* * Shawcross et al; Hepatology’08 Shawcross et al; Hepatology ‘12 Dong t al, LivInt ‘13; Yang et al J Trans Med ‘12
n=12 n=14 n=37 n=9 n=8 Immune dysfunction in ACLF II Reduced monocyte activation/tolerance to LPS Impaired phagocytosis E.Coli/S.Aureus HLA-DR Reduced pathogen clearance • LPS-evoked • TNF-a Bernsmeier et al, EASL ‘14 Wasmuth et al, J Hep ‘05; Berry et al, Intensive care Med ‘11
Novel therapies for ACLF or are they not so novel? • Very little progress over past 20-30 years in management per se • Advances in critical care support but little impact on outcome • Emergence of multi-drug resistance & increased frequency in C.Difficle • Key unmet need in patients with liver disease: • Novel approaches to established therapies • Biomarkers –targeting early detection of infection • Novel therapies to targeting immune failure
Albumin : re-orientating the indication as a therapy for infection? • ATTIRE study (UK): • PGE2- suppresses TNF-a • Albumin binds PGE2 – • restores TNF-a responses • Standard of care for prevention renal/circulatory dysfunction in SBP (metanalysis4 RCT [n=288]; Salerno et al ClinGastHep ‘13) • Controversy in use to improve outcome in non-SBP induced sepsis: • Guevara et al (n=110): improvement in renal/circulatory dysfunction/MR • Thevenot et al (ALB-CIRINF studyn=191): no improvement in renal function or mortality O’Brien et al, Nat Med ‘14
N-acetylcysteine in alcoholic hepatitis?immune-modulatory role • 174 patients 11 centres France • Steroids ± NAC (5 days 150 mg/kg) • NAC group mortality benefit at 1 month : • trend at 2 and 6 mnths • Decreased infections in NAC group • Decreased HRF at 2 and 6 mnths Nguyen-Khac et al, NEJM ‘11
Corticosteroids in ACLF: immunmodulatoryvsimmunosuppressive “Low dose” hydrocortisone may augment immune function • Controversy regarding use of hydrocortisone in cirrhosis with organ failure • High incidence of adrenal insufficiency (>60% patients) • 3 main studies: • Arabi et al, CMAJ ’10 • Fernandez et al, Hepatology ‘06 • Marik et al, Crit Care Med ’05 • Improvement in vasopressor requirments; variable mortality benefit • Imunmodulatory effects in ACLF unknown Keh et al, Am J RespirCrit Care Med ‘03
Immuno-stimulatory therapies in ACLF G-CSF therapy in ACLF: n=47; mostly ETOH, HBV G-CSF at a dose of 5 mcg/kg subcutaneously, 12 doses over a period of 1 month (daily doses for the first 5 days and then every third day), Increase CD34+ progenitor responses/hepatic regeneration Improve neutrophil function/prevent sepsis No differences in sepsis during study period; only on follow-up Garg et al; Gastro ‘12
Conclusions • ACLF is multisystem disorder with high short mortality 35-50% • Sepsis is commonest trigger for evolution to organ failure & 4-fold increase in mortality • Sepsis, SIRS responses & extra-hepatic organ failure confer poor outcome • Bacterial translocation of gut-derived organisms • pathogenic factor for seeding of microbes/sepsis development • “culture-negative sepsis” in cirrhosis • Activation of SIRS responses • Circulatory/hepatic endothelial dysfunction
Conclusions • Important to identify early and Rx with goal directed therapy (as in sepsis) may improve outcome • Early treatment prior to or to offset the progression of organ failure- abrogate infection triggered inflammatory cascade in decompensated cirrhosis • “Top-down” approach rather than conventional “top-up” • Always think about sepsis as a cause of admission or deterioration following admission
liver Circulation Immuneparesis Early predictive biomarkers of infection Bacterial products ccytokine secretion Hepatic regeneration Albumin therapy RES Phagocytosis Oxidative burst LPS tolerance/PGE2 shunting pathogens • Impaired clearance • Production of opsonins • Albumin Immune cells Immunomonitoring Immune modulatory therapies migration bacterial products pathogens pathogens Reduction in microbial gut translocation bacterial products gut Impaired immune responses Microbial seeding/translocation - bacterial flora - gut permeability - local immune response sites of infection
Conclusions • Thank you for your attention • Questions?