380 likes | 577 Views
The Coming of Sound. THE INTRODUCTION OF SOUND. EARLY ATTEMPTS AT SOUND: EDISON 1895, combined phonograph & kinetoscope to create KINETOPHONE It was unsuccessful, mostly due to problems with synchronization OTHER ATTEMPTS AT SOUND IN THE SILENT ERA
E N D
THE INTRODUCTION OF SOUND • EARLY ATTEMPTS AT SOUND: EDISON • 1895, combined phonograph & kinetoscope to create KINETOPHONE • It was unsuccessful, mostly due to problems with synchronization • OTHER ATTEMPTS AT SOUND IN THE SILENT ERA • Other experiments provided sound with movies • Primary source of sound provided at theater; music, sound effects, etc.
SYNCHRONIZED SOUND(1927-28) • ECONOMICS OF THE TRANSITION • STUDIO CONSERVATISM • “Big 3”: Paramount, Loew's/MGM, & 1st National • All profitable, & resisted the transition to sound • All 3 had extensive chains of picture palaces • Radio & telephone companies researched sound, rejected by Big 3
SYNCHRONIZED SOUND(1927-28) • WARNER BROS. & AT&T (Western Electric) • WARNER BROS. • 1 of the “2nd tier”, had mostly 2nd & 3rd run theaters • 1925, cooperated with AMERICAN TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE (AT&T) on sound development • WESTERN ELECTRIC • Subsidiary established by AT&T to research & manufacture technology • Developed 33 rpm turntables & records, amplifiers & loudspeakers
SYNCHRONIZED SOUND(1927-28) • VITAPHONE • Both process & holding company created to exploit process • They began with musical shorts • 1st big feature film success The Jazz Singer (1927) • Had 4 Vitaphone segments, all primarily musical numbers • Rest was silent (with inter-titles) • PROBLEMS WITH SOUND ON DISC • Difficult to maintain consistent synchronization • Supposedly, because each disc was 10 min. long, each shot in the film also had to be 10 min. long
SYNCHRONIZED SOUND(1927-28) • FOX MOVIE-TONE SYSTEM • Fox interested in sound after Warner's success • 1927, adopted OPTICAL sound system (sound recorded on film) • Developed by General Electric, still used today • Superior to Vitaphone system • Always in synchronization • Greater flexibility in editing • But required Western Electric amplifiers & speakers
SYNCHRONIZED SOUND(1927-28) • THE PATENTS POOL • Big 3 waited to see which system would succeed • Formed a committee of Academy to choose a system • 1928, patents pool resulted in standard system: Fox's optical sound & Western Electric equipment • At this point, all important film companies committed to sound films using new system
SYNCHRONIZED SOUND(1927-28) • RCA & RKO • RCA developed optical sound system in 1928 called RCA PHOTOPHONE • Created its own studio, RKO (RADIO-KEITH-ORPHEUM), to exploit its new sound system
PROBLEMS & SOLUTIONS • TECHNICAL • MICROPHONES • Had to be hidden from view • Eventually, mounted on mobile booms • CAMERAS • Had to be electrically powered • Motors were noisy • 1st placed in sound-proof booths, later surrounded by sound-proof, mobile blimps • Finally, noiseless cameras were developed
PROBLEMS & SOLUTIONS • PERSONNEL • Many veterans of the silent era did not make the transition to sound • Had unpleasant voices, or voices that did not match screen images • Assumption that writers, directors, etc. did not "know how" to work with sound • New talent largely from Broadway stage
SOUND-ON-FILM • An alternative to an existing option: dialog inter-titles • It had other functions as well • It helped define characters • It increased verisimilitude • Decreased costs of exhibition • 3 major changes in industry: • Fox became 1 of the Big 5 due to its success with sound • Warner joined Big 5 (bought 1st National & Stanley theater chain) • RKO completed Big 5 • Big 5 (Paramount, Loew's/MGM, Fox, Warner Bros., RKO) controlled industry until at least 1950s
Self-Regulation in Hollywood Roscoe (“Fatty”) Arbuckle
Movies seen as 1st real threat to cultural dominance of upper classes over lower classes • Created by lower class • Patronized by lower classes • Accepted by middle & upper classes • Groups sought to reestablish control primarily through censorship
THE CREATION OF THE MPPDA • CENSORSHIP • Numerous state & local censorship boards • Each imposed different set of standards • THE HOLLYWOOD SCANDALS • FATTY ARBUCKLE CASE • DESMOND TAYLOR CASE • WALLACE REID CASE
Love letter (in code) from Mary Miles Minter to Desmond Taylor
THE CREATION OF THE MPPDA • MPPDA set up by industry in 1922 • In theory, a self-regulatory body; in practice, a public relations body • Created to accomplish 2 goals • End spread of state & local censorship boards • Improve image of film industry • Will Hays served as head of MPPDA • Former Postmaster-General, ultra-conservative Republican from Indiana, a devout Presbyterian • Much later, it became clear that Hays was a crook
THE PRODUCTION CODE& THE BREEN OFFICE • In early 1930s, 2 factors renewed the criticism • Box-office decline resulted in more violent & racier content • Sound added a new way for movies to be offensive • 1933, LEGION OF DECENCY, Catholic organization, led boycotts of Hollywood films
THE PRODUCTION CODE& THE BREEN OFFICE • THE PRODUCTION CODE • 1929, production code drafted to codify suggestions made by MPPDA regarding content, & to deal with problems of sound • PRODUCTION CODE ADMINISTRATION (PCA) created in 1934 to enforce code • THE BREEN OFFICE • Joseph Breen appointed director of PCA • No film not approved by PCA would be shown in a theater owned by a member of MPPDA
THE PRODUCTION CODE& THE BREEN OFFICE • STAGES IN APPROVAL • Preliminary story conference • Approval of the script; negotiations • Production conferences • Approval of scenes as produced during production • Approval of the completed film; negotiations • Appeal if not approved
THE PRODUCTION CODE& THE BREEN OFFICE • RESTRICTIONS • CRIME • SEX • VULGARITY, OBSCENITY, & PROFANITY • RELIGION • GOVERNMENT • REPELLENT SUBJECTS IN GENERAL • END OF THE CODE • 1950s & 1960s, Church began to lose control over younger generation & TV threatened film industry • Code was abandoned • Replaced by RATINGS SYSTEM in 1968