600 likes | 909 Views
Discourse and Pragmatics. Week 9 Strategic Interaction. Whos doing Whats. When we use language we communicate Who we are and who we think the people we are communicating with are What we think we are doing. Interactional Sociolinguistics. Whos doing Whats in Talk
E N D
Discourse and Pragmatics Week 9 Strategic Interaction
Whos doing Whats • When we use language we communicate • Who we are and who we think the people we are communicating with are • What we think we are doing
Interactional Sociolinguistics • Whos doing Whats in Talk • ‘Strategies’ of doing and being • ‘Small stuff’ matters • Even the smallest features of talk are functional and potentially meaningful • Subtle variations in the way we talk can create big problems in communication and in relationships
Whos and Whats • Whos • Presentation of the Self • Conversational Style • Politeness • Whats • Framing and Contextualization Cues • Whos + Whats • Positioning
Whos • Presentation of the Self
Who are you? • The is no fixed, essential ‘self’ • The idea of a consistent self is an illusion • It is also a ‘necessary fiction’ for social interaction • It is better to talk of ‘selves’ rather than ‘self’ • We perform different ‘selves’ to different people in different situations
What is the ‘self’ • Erving Goffman: sociologist • The presentation of Self in Everyday Life (1959) • Focus on ordinary social interaction • ‘Dramaturgical’ Approach • Life is like a play
The self • Can be divided into: • performer • character • We are all actors • We are always performing • What is ‘true’ or ‘real’ • Depends on how much we ‘believe’ in the character we are portraying
Sincerity Sincere ------------------------Cynical • We always have something to hide! • Whether we are being ‘honest’ or ‘dishonest’, we must exercise similar ‘care’ in creating the ‘impression’ that we want to create • Audience must believe the performance to be ‘real’ if it is to be effective • Businessperson vs. con-man • Lover vs. gigolo
Interaction involves... • performers • audience • roles • The main risk in interaction is that your performance will be inadequate or ‘questioned’ by your audience
Controlling Information • Information that is ‘given’ • Information that is ‘given off’ • Information ‘leakage’
Performance • Elements of performance: • ‘Routine’ • ‘Front’ • ‘Line’ • ‘Face’
Audience segregation • We use different fronts for different people in different situations • We usually arrange our lives so that the people towards whom we play one part are different from those towards whom we play another part • Difficulties of performing to ‘mixed audiences’ • Regions (frontstage and backstage)
Whos • Conversational Styles • New Yorkers and Californians • The Silent Finn
Example: ‘Valley girl talk’ • Habitual rising intonation • ‘Like’ • "I, like, didn't say anything." • Relationship to gender • Negative evaluations • Systematic variation • Uptalk: Given and new information • Like: discourse marker, marker of social identity
Some Functions of ‘Like’ • Inspecificity • She's like five foot five. • She's five foot five. • Hyperbole • She's like ten feet tall. • She's ten feet tall. • Quotation • She was like, I don't see why that's necessary. • * She was, I don't see why that's necessary.
Example: ‘Language Crimes’ • Roger Shuy • Forensic Linguistics • Agent: You see these plans are very hard to get. • Engineer: uh-huh • A: I need to get them at night • E: uh-huh • A: It’s not done easily • E: uh-huh • A: understand? • E: uh-huh • +++++++ • A: How are you? • E: uh-huh
Politeness • How we communicate our relationship with other people in our language
Two kinds of face • Negative face (desire for autonomy, personal space,freedom from imposition, freedom of action) • Positive face (desire for self-image to be acknowledged and approved of) • Each are addressed with specific formsof face work
Two Kinds of Face Strategies • Involvement • ‘Solidarity’ • Showing ‘closeness’ or solidarity • using first name, expressing interest, claiming common point of view, using informal language
Involvement Strategies • Use first name or nicknames • Use informal language • Use a ‘common language’ • Act interested, sympathetic • Be direct • Agree • Claim common experiences, interests, group membership • Talk about ‘us’
Two Kinds of Face Strategy • Independence • Showing ‘respect’ • using titles, not making assumptions, apologizing, using formal language
Independence Strategies • Use titles • Use formal language • Don’t make assumptions • Apologize • Be indirect • Try to minimize imposition • Hedge • Talk about things not having to do with us
Independence and Involvement • In any interaction we usually use both independence and involvement strategies • The problem is deciding how and when to use these strategies • Based on • who we are talking to • why we are talking to them
Deference Face System • -P, +D • symmetrical (equal) • participants see themselves as at same social level • distant • both would use mostly independence strategies
Solidarity Face System • -P, -D • symmetrical • close • both participants likely to use more involvement strategies
Hierarchical Face System • +P, +/-D • asymmetrical (unequal) • asymmetrical face strategies • higher uses more involvement • lower uses more independence
Deference Speaker<-----------------Independence--------------->Speaker Solidarity Speaker<--Involvement-->Speaker Hierarchical Speaker (involvement) Speaker (independence)
But it’s really not that simple... • There is another factor • W • Weight of imposition • W+/ W-
Conflicting Strategies/Mixed up systems • Two businessmen meeting for the first time • Mr R: (reading Mr. Wong’s business card which says Wong Hon Fai) Hi, Hon Fai. I’m Bill Richardson. My friends call me Bill. • Mr W: How do you do Mr. Richardson. • Mr. Wong thinks: That guy is acting too familiar, who does he think he is? • expects deference system, hears hierarchical system • Mr. R. thinks: This guy doesn’t want to be my friend. He’s not very nice. • expects solidarity system, hears deference system
Frames • The way we signal • and interpret • what’s going on • what we are doing in interaction
Frames • Interpretative Frames • Interactive Frames
Interpretative Frames • Participants general expectations about • objects • people • settings • ways to interact • Restaurants, Classrooms, Karaoke Boxes, MTR, etc.
Interpretive Frames • Schema • ‘World knowledge’ • our knowledge of the physical and biological world, our agreement about what ‘reality’ is • ‘Social knowledge’ • our knowledge of social conventions around different kinds of activities
An embarrassing situation... • Getting a taxi in Taipei
Interactive Frames • ‘a definition of what is going on in interaction (or a any point in the interaction) without which no utterance (or movement or gesture) could be correctly interpreted.’ • Tannen and Wallat
Monkeys • Gregory Bateson • Observations of monkeys at play • ‘a monkey need to know whether a bite from another monkey is intended within the frame of play or the frame of fighting.’
She knows... • Play time • walk time • meal time • quiet time • trouble time
Interactive Frames • Frames of activity within an interaction • We usually don’t just do one thing at once • There are • Overlapping frames • talking on the phone and playing with my dog • Frames within frames • Lecture--activity--Lecture • Serious--joking--Serious
What’s going on here? • Doctor: (feeling child’s stomach) Okay, now let me see what I can find in there. Is there a peanut butter and jelly? Wait a minute... • Child: No. • Doctor: No peanut butter and jelly in there? • Child: No. • Doctor: Now move your legs up a little..Okay? Any peanut butter and jelly in there? • Child: No. • Doctor: No? Is your spleen palpable over there? • Child: No.
How does she know? • Gestures • Movements • Intonation • Loudness • Voice quality
Contextualization Cues • ‘Surface features of message form which are the means by which speakers signal and listeners interpret… • what the activity is • what words mean • and how what they say is related to what has been said before or what will be said after.
‘Framing’ and ‘Contextualization Cues’ • John Gumperz • Contextualization cues • any sign which serves to construct the contextual ground for situated interpretations, and thereby affects how constituent messages are understood. • Stress, intonation, voice quality (prosody) • Paralinguistic cues • Code choice • ‘Nervous’
Competing Frames • Tutorial Task
‘Discourse markers’ • Focus: as far as ... is concerned, speaking of which • Clarification: I mean, actually • Contrast: on the other hand, mind you, whereas • Dismissal of previous discourse: anyway, whatever • Change of subject: whatever, by the way, ok • Consequence: so, then, as a result • ‘Anyway’
Tutorial Task • Listen for the tokens: • ‘umm’ or ‘eh’ • ‘you know’ • ‘ok’ • What are the functions of these utterances in the conversation
Positioning • In interaction we negotiate who we are in relation to each other (face) • We also negotiate what we are doing/what’s ‘going on’ (frames) • But interactions do not happen in a vacuum • Every interaction has histories (stories) behind it
Positioning • Tries to connect the individual interaction with the bigger picture • Tries to show how we build up identities in interaction • Position • military language • marketing language • Putting yourself and people you talk to in some position in relation to other speakers and the groups that make up the culture
Positioning • ‘Karen, what do you think about positioning?’ • Questioner/Answerer • Teacher/Student • Powerful/Less Powerful