40 likes | 61 Views
Explore Freud's belief in innate aggression versus Rogers' view of innate goodness. Discuss societal restraints, trust, and human behavior. Are people naturally driven by aggressive instincts or innately good? Find out in this insightful comparison.
E N D
Freud Versus Rogers • Pessimistic versus optimistic • Freud believed that the human aggressive instinct was innate, persistent, and pervasive • The essence of human nature is destructive • The internal superego and external societal restraints keep this destructive nature in check
Freud versus Rogers • Rogers… • People are “…positive, forward-moving, constructive, realistic, trustworthy…innately good.” • Cultural restraints and frustrations lead to antisocial behavior • We should trust people to choose to behave in ways that will perpetuate their survival as well as the health and survival of others
What do you think? • Are people inherently driven by aggressive instincts? • Is it necessary for society, parents, culture, religion to restrain the urges of the id? • Are people naturally good? • If people existed in a truly free and nurturing environment, would they invariably make constructive choices?
Websites of interest… • http://freud.t0.or.at/freud/sectns-e.htm • http://plaza.interport.net/nypsan/freudarc.html • www.cgjungpage.org • http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/hstein/homepage/htm • www.karenhorneycenter.org