1 / 23

Overview of Issues: Barriers to Developing EHR in This Field

Overview of Issues: Barriers to Developing EHR in This Field. Constance Weisner, DrPH, MSW Jennifer Mertens, PhD Stacy Sterling, MSW, MPH Narrowing the Research-Practice Divide in Evidence-Based Medicine with Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems: Present and Future Directions

bowen
Download Presentation

Overview of Issues: Barriers to Developing EHR in This Field

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview of Issues:Barriers to Developing EHR in This Field Constance Weisner, DrPH, MSW Jennifer Mertens, PhD Stacy Sterling, MSW, MPH Narrowing the Research-Practice Divide in Evidence-Based Medicine with Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems: Present and Future Directions National Institute of Drug AbuseRockville, MDJuly 13-14, 2009

  2. Overview • History • Barriers • Infrastructure • Workforce • Multiple system interaction • Most programs are free-standing-not part of a health plan/using the same EMR • Privacy • Potential

  3. National Policy Approach to Behavioral Health Care Crossing the Quality Chasm’s aims, rules, and strategies for redesign should be applied throughout Mental Health/Substance Use health care on a day-to-day operational basis tailored to reflect the characteristics that distinguish Mental Health /Substance Use health care from general health care. Institute of Medicine. Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Conditions: Quality Chasm Series. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.

  4. Six Critical Pathways for Achieving Aims • Effective use of information technology (IT) • News ways of delivering care • Managing the clinical knowledge, skills, and deployment of the workforce • Effective teams and coordination of care across patient conditions, services and settings • Improvements in how quality is measured • Payment methods conducive to good quality

  5. Increased stigma, discrimination, & coercion Patient decision-making ability not as anticipated / supported Diagnosis more subjective A less developed quality measurement & improvement infrastructure More separate care delivery arrangements Less involvement in the NHII and use of IT More diverse workforce and more solo practice Differently structured marketplace M/SU Health Care Compared to General Health Care

  6. Health Plans / Purchasers Recommendations (cont): • Require all contracting organizations to appropriately share patient information; • Provide incentives for the use of electronic health records and other IT; • Use tools to reduce adverse risk selection of M/SU treatment consumers; and • Use measures of quality and coordination of care in purchasing / and oversight. • Associations of purchasers work to reduce variation in reporting / billing requirements.

  7. Characteristics of the Addiction Treatment System

  8. Addiction Specialty Care 11,600 13,200specialtyprograms in US • 31% treat less than 200 patients per year • 65% private, not for profit • 77%primarily governmentfundedPrivate insurance <12% Sources – NSSATS, 2002; D’Aunno, 2004

  9. Referral Sources Source 19902008 Criminal Justice 38% 61% Employers/EAP 10% 6% Welfare/CPS 8% 14% Hosp/Phys 4% 3%

  10. Adolescent Treatment Referral Sources • Parents - 83% • Health care provider - 18% • Legal system - 33% (20% Court Mandated) • Friends - 19% • Mental health providers - 35% • Schools - 13%

  11. Program Infrastructure Phone Interviews With National Sample of 175 Programs regarding personnel, management, information McL, Carise & Kleber JSAT, 2003

  12. Program Changes In 16 Months: • 12% had closed • 13% had changed service operation • 31% of the rest had been taken over, usually by MH agencies

  13. Counselor turnover 50% per year 50% of directors have been there Less Than 1 year STAFF TURNOVER!

  14. Other Staff • 54%Had no physician 34% Had P/T physician 39% Had a Nurse • < 25% Had a SW or a Psychologist • Major professional group - Counselors

  15. Information Systems: • Modest Computer Availability • Mostly For Administrative Work • 80% Had a Computer • 50% had Web Access • Still very little computer/software availabilityfor CLINICAL STAFF

  16. Multiple System Interaction • Unique to behavioral health care: Most programs are free-standing • collaborative care with: • Health systems • Criminal Justice • Welfare • Important issues for internal EMRs and cross-system communication • Should privacy regulations be the same for each system? • Where the program is embedded?

  17. Privacy • “Prevent disclosure of addiction treatment and diagnoses; also create barriers to accessing data and complicate coordination of care, especially with regard to EHRs and electronic networks.”(Institute of Medicine, 2006)

  18. Privacy (cont’d) • Continuing Care • Stigma • Variation in clinical and patient concerns

  19. Opportunities • Coordination with other systems • Communication with patients • Epidemiologic surveillance • Outcomes monitoring

  20. Using Standardized Instruments at Intake and Follow-up

  21. Conclusion • Barriers are large and involve characteristics of the treatment system, regulatory issues, workforce issues, and long-term work styles. • Opportunities are increasing and field is ready to grapple with these issues.

  22. Thank you!

More Related