170 likes | 461 Views
“FLOMANIA”, DES WORKSHOP, 2/3 July 2003, St.-Petersburg. Numerical analysis of turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection in confined enclosures using a hybrid RANS/LES approach. A. ABRAMOV, N. IVANOV & E. SMIRNOV. St.-Petersburg State Polytechnic University
E N D
“FLOMANIA”, DES WORKSHOP, 2/3 July 2003, St.-Petersburg Numerical analysis of turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection in confined enclosures using a hybrid RANS/LES approach A. ABRAMOV, N. IVANOV & E. SMIRNOV St.-Petersburg State Polytechnic University Department of Aerodynamics, St.-Petersburg, Russia E-mail: aerofmf@citadel.stu.neva.ru
OUTLINE Introduction Problem description Mathematical model Computational aspects Structure of turbulent convection Heat transfer predictions Conclusions Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia “FLOMANIA”, DES WORKSHOP, 2/3 July 2003, St.-Petersburg
3D Unsteady formulations: modeling levels 1. Full Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS): no turbulence model 2. Under-resolved (coarse-grid) DNS: no turbulence model 3. Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS): modeling of all-scales background turbulence 4. Large Eddy Simulation (LES): modeling of subgrid-scale turbulence 5. RANS/LES hybridization, in particular, non-standard DES Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia “FLOMANIA”, DES WORKSHOP, 2/3 July 2003, St.-Petersburg
Problem description High-Ra Rayleigh-Bénard mercury and water convection in confined enclosures g z Cold walls, Tc z Scales: H r H Adiabaticwalls H - buoyancy velocity Hot walls, Th D = H Water, Pr = 7 Mercury, Pr = 0.025 Ra > 108 Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia “FLOMANIA”, DES WORKSHOP, 2/3 July 2003, St.-Petersburg
Mathematical model Navier-Stokes equations averaged/filtered for a RANS/LES model; Boussinesq’s approximation for gravity buoyancy where Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia “FLOMANIA”, DES WORKSHOP, 2/3 July 2003, St.-Petersburg
Turbulence Modelling: RANS / LES one-equation turbulence model (Abramov & Smirnov, 2002) Modified Wolfshtein model for a RANS zone: Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia “FLOMANIA”, DES WORKSHOP, 2/3 July 2003, St.-Petersburg
Computational aspects Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia “FLOMANIA”, DES WORKSHOP, 2/3 July 2003, St.-Petersburg
Computational program Mercury convection: 108 < Ra < 5109 Pr= 0.025 Water convection: Ra = 5108;5109 Pr= 7 Grids of about 160000 cells Conditions of experiments: Takeshita et al.(Phys. Rev. Lett.,1996) Cioni et al.(J. Fluid Mech.,1997) Glazier et al.(Nature, 1999) Conditions of experiments: Zocchi et al. (Physica A.,1990) Cioni et al.(J. Fluid Mech.,1997) Qiu et al.(Phys. Rev. E., 1998) etc. Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia “FLOMANIA”, DES WORKSHOP, 2/3 July 2003, St.-Petersburg
Vb Vb Structure of turbulent convection Mercury convection: Ra = 108, Pr= 0.025 Temperature isolines Vertical velocity at middle horizontal plane w Velocity vector patterns Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia “FLOMANIA”, DES WORKSHOP, 2/3 July 2003, St.-Petersburg
Structure of turbulent convection Mercury convection: Ra = 108, Pr= 0.025 Equiscalar surfaces of vertical velocity w = 0.25 (gray) and w = -0.25 (black) Temperature and velocity vector fields Vertical velocity distributions (time-averaging over the interval of 10 time units) w Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia
Structure of turbulent convection Water convection: Ra = 5109, Pr= 7 A A Equiscalar surfaces of vertical velocity w = 0.05 (black) and w = -0.05 (gray) B Velocity vector and temperature fields B A A B B Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia “FLOMANIA”, DES WORKSHOP, 2/3 July 2003, St.-Petersburg
z 5108 5109 z 5108 5109 z Th wm 108 5108 8.7108 Th z wmc=2Vg 108 5108 8.7108 wm Characteristics of the global circulation Profiles of maximum horizontal temperature difference and vertical velocity difference Reynolds number Reg= VgH /, versus Rayleigh number. Mercury Water Mercury Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia
Thermal plumes in high-Ra convection Temperature isosurfaces T= 0.45 and T = 0.55 Temperature isosurface T= 0.9 colored by vertical velocity w Ra = 5108 Ra = 5109 Temperature fluctuations near the top wall (z = 0.96) Temperature fluctuations near the bottom wall (z = 0.03, r = 0) plumes T T plumes Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia
-5/3 -4 Turbulent vertical velocity and temperature fluctuations Water, Ra = 5109 T W -5/3 -4 z = 0.5 z z = 0.75 Mercury, Ra = 5108 Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia “FLOMANIA”, DES WORKSHOP, 2/3 July 2003, St.-Petersburg
z 5108 5109 z 108 uh 5108 8.7108 T Boundary layers near the isothermal walls Temperature profile near the top wall (mercury) Thermal and viscous boundary layer thicknesses as functions of Ra T T Ra - RANS/LES in water Mercury: V < T Water: V > T - RANS/LES in mercury - DNS Verzicco et al., 99 - Experiment Takeshita et al., 96 Ra Mean horizontal velocity profile (water) V - DNS Verzicco et al., 99 - Experiment Takeshita et al., 96 Ra - RANS/LES in mercury - RANS/LES in water Ra Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia
Eq -5/3 -4 fq f Heat transfer predictions Nusselt number fluctuations in mercury and water convection Ra = 5108 Nu t - RANS/LES in water Nu - RANS/LES in mercury Ra = 5109 - Exp. Cioni et al., 96 Nu - Exp. Goldstein, 80 - Exp. Glazier, 99 t Ra Abramov et al. SPTU, Russia “FLOMANIA”, DES WORKSHOP, 2/3 July 2003, St.-Petersburg
“FLOMANIA”, DES WORKSHOP, 2/3 July 2003, St.-Petersburg CONCLUSIONS Numerical simulations of high-Ra R-B convection was performed with a non-standard DES approach based on the one-equation k-model of unresolved turbulence The specific patterns of fully developed turbulent convection were analyzed, especially the formation of a large-scale circulation cell and thermal plumes for both the configurations In mercury the global circulation, velocity and temperature fluctuations are considerably more intensive than in water Relation between the thicknesses of the viscous layer and the thermal boundary layer was established Numerically predicted Nusselt numbers were in quantitative agreement with registered experimental laws