1 / 25

AS-IDS Information meeting 9 December 2002 for SPO’s, DPO’s & RC’s

AS-IDS Information meeting 9 December 2002 for SPO’s, DPO’s & RC’s. Agenda. Overview of IDS people, products , process PPT, CET, HRT, EDH review 2002 work in progress / pipeline tasks for 2003 (& beyond) Discussions & Questions AoB + Drink. Overview of IDS People & Products.

branden-fitzpatrick
Download Presentation

AS-IDS Information meeting 9 December 2002 for SPO’s, DPO’s & RC’s

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AS-IDS Information meeting 9 December 2002for SPO’s, DPO’s & RC’s

  2. Agenda • Overview of IDS • people, products , process • PPT, CET, HRT, EDH • review 2002 • work in progress / pipeline • tasks for 2003 (& beyond) • Discussions & Questions • AoB + Drink

  3. Overview of IDS People & Products

  4. AS-IDS in the AIS picture AIS = AS-OP + AS-CIS + AS-IDS + AS-SAS • OP responsible for streamlining & simplifying administrative procedures • CIS responsibility for the Corporate applications (HR, Qualiac, BAAN, Foundation, CFU etc.) to restricted users • IDS interfacing with CIS applications to provide input (EDH, PPT) and output (CET, HRT, EDH, PPT) to all users • SAS Providing Infrastructure (machines, databases) & services (ais support)

  5. How are requirements gathered? Users Committees Regular Contact DPO, DAO’s CLA GTPA Support Calls AS-OP DPO meeting SAPOCO Ad-hoc (AoC) TEC Directorate / MB User contact Helpdesk Suggestions/Ideas Services Purchasing Stores Logistics Finance Changing Environment Changing Organisation Databases Working Practices Machines Baan EVM HR Safety Rules QUALIAC Financial Rules & Controls

  6. How is work planned / prioritised Team / GL DL / Director GL/Supervisor Planning Day POW MAPS Business Case + Resources? New requirements CGL / DL Jan Mar Jul Dec

  7. Why this meeting ? • Traditional meeting over the last few years with DPO’s – this year extended to RC’s & SPO’s • SPO’s, DPO’s & RC’s represent key users for us….information exchange deemed mutually beneficial • You, and your colleagues can contact us at ANY time • ais.support is the preferred route for bugs, questions etc. from any user • Direct contact for requirements, suggestions, feedback from key users • We do our best to listen to and react on User input, however we are constrained by our resource situation & “external influences” • http://ais.cern.ch/info/ids/idspow2002.html

  8. PPT Review, Status & Future Jurgen De Jonghe

  9. PPT Review 2002 • Feb: aisMedia to replace Tuovi doc database • March/April: LHC contract tracking with PPT to determine LHC expenditure profile • May: Specification for LHC Earned Value Management tool • June: Architecture, Analysis, Design… • Sept: first release of EVM tool • Oct: first production release + 2nd LHC contract tracking based on PPT repository • Nov: conversion of existing data to automatically upload in PPT • Dec: LHC-MMS data

  10. PPT Work In Progress & Future • Short: • further data collection for LHC EVM • evangelism • automatic progress reporting cycle • Medium: • technical consolidation • EVM graphs, trends, component rates • workflow • manpower • Long: • other CERN projects: CNGS, Atlas installation

  11. HRT Review, Status & Future Per Gunnar Jönsson

  12. HRT 2002 Achievements • MAPS form • FAS Programs • Due to very successful collaboration with HR • New access mechanisms • Multiple roles • Access using PPA • Personal Access (myHRT) • Historical Personnel Summary & List • Substantial work on improving data extractions

  13. HRT 2002 Usage • The obligatory statistics: • 1400 different people have been using HRT • 1200 queries per day (1700 peak). • Biggest user 6000+ queries during 2002

  14. HRT 2003 • Much work needed that’s not directly visible • Extractions need to be further looked into • Move to Oracle Jdeveloper development software. • Current software obsolete and dropped by manufacturer. • Move to Oracle 9iAS server software. • Current software obsolete. • Tools for enhanced efficiency in creating new reports.

  15. HRT 2003 continued. • FAS Programs • HR Collaboration to continue. • Images (for guard services). • French Card applications. • Pick up on backlog of requests.

  16. BHT/CET Review, Status & Future Mikael Angberg

  17. BHT 2002 • BHT Maintenance • Yearly and Monthly bookclosings • 525 Remedy requests during 2002 • 519 Solved • Maintenance and support level put “on hold” because of CET • BHT Usage • Up to 1’300 reports per day (04/02/2002) • 168’142 Reports in Total during 2002 • 1’402 Different Users of BHT during 2002 • BHT will run until Financial End of Year 2002 • Still to be done in BHT • Yearly bookclosing of 2002 (no data for 2003 in BHT)

  18. CET “it is recommended that CERN upgrade BHT (Budget Holder Toolkit) to allow project engineer, group leaders and project management to follow a contract under its responsibility from the beginning to the end with a user-friendly access to all the relevant data needed. “ • In addition to existing BHT functionality, CET provides for : • Contract Tracking • Cashflow tuning (with PPT) • Extensive pluri-annual reporting • Supplier vs Budget Code payment perspectives • Date-tracked Pipeline • Tighter integration with CFU • Extended Team & Collaboration Accounting • Many enhanced reports (pivot, telephone) • Bookclosed Daily • LHC, FI & SPL specific reports • EVM reporting (with PPT) 4 Presentations 4 Tailor Made workshops 25,000 reports, 400 users Issues Sorting, subtotals, pipeline Descriptions, Stored Reports & Macros

  19. CET Future • BHT Run in Parallel • Until close of financial year 2002 • 2003 Data in CET only • Resolve outstanding issues • Sorting, Excel export etc • New data, features & reports • Reports : Personnel, EVM, SPL & FI specific • Data : Invoice pipeline • Features : Price revisions++ • Event Subscription (wibnify) • Budget Alerts • Expenditure (Ceiling) Alerts

  20. EDH Review, Status & Future James Purvis

  21. Review of 2002 Document search AVCL Subsistence, Advance, Sundry Expenses, 3rd Party Payment, Home Leave New Catalog Enclosures New Search Screens for Roles, Profiles & Signature Rights Workflow Fixes to allow Userreg Special routings New Desktop XML Import New Personal Schedule Removal of more legacy code Catalog maintenance tool AOC document AOC creator right. New version of Oriac / Siriac New Database Enclosures (by email or file upload) Leave Request New Home Leave calculation AIS Event system TT terminated (impact)

  22. Controls, controls, controls… • DR reference in DAI & Activity Code in All Documents • DRs > 50K  Programme Controller & Director of Admin • DAIs > 50K if no DR  Programme Controller & Director of Admin • DAIs > 50K  Programme Controller & Director of Admin • DAIs > 50 K  Programme Controller • DRs > 50K  Programme Controller • SCEM 53, but not SCEMs 53.11.15A, 53.11.15B, 53.11.34B, 53.11.39A, 53.11.39B, 53.11.39C, 53.14.10  Programme Controller • Activity Codes 11,15,41,43,82,85,871,877,9, 52*  GL & DL • SCEMs : 7.06,12.03,12.08,12.11,12.15.01,12.15.02,20,53  GL & DL Divisional Special Routings • ST Division special financial routing (GL & DPO) • TIS Division special financial routing (DL) • SPL Division special financial routing (DL) • SL Division Project Routing • IT Division Project Routing • Plus some special Leave, Overtime & Home Leave confirmation routings requested by DAOs (EP, SL, PS…) Divisions with NO special routings • AC, AS, DG, DSU, EST, ETT, FI, HR, LHC, TH,

  23. Coming in 2003 • New EDH Desktop • Full text search • Export to Excel • Personal Folders (similar to BHT & HRT) • New Search Tools • Full text search on Budget Codes, Contracts, etc. • New EDH Catalog • Search + XML import • New Design • 100,000 new items • Infrastructure • Workflow Upgrade • Web Server Upgrade • IDE Upgrade • Accident Declaration • AVCL (7 Documents) • New Documents • PAF (MAPS?, CDFS?, …) • Backlog from 2001/2002 • TCR Overtime integration? • Attachments

  24. Impact Of EVM Development Delayed / Not Completed Project Request Form Enclosures in EDH AVCL Replacement Catalogue Maintenance & Import Tool Accident Declaration Better Support for Externals Development Not Started Maintenance of Intersection Codes PAFS Contract Minutes Workflow XML Import for Transport Request Confidential Stamp CMS enhancement requests for PPT ATLAS enhancement requests for PPT EVM requests for experiments, GRID & Others in PPT Improved productivity tools for ART & EDH Additional Consequences Technology “Freeze” Running on obsolete & unsupported versions of Oracle WF Developing using Obsolete IDE Running Web applications on obsolete Application Server Supporting of 6500+ users In Industry EVM implementation cost = 2% of total project cost .Zero extra resources given to group for EVM.

  25. Discussions / QuestionsAoB

More Related