1 / 8

Improving the basis for MPA planning

Improving the basis for MPA planning. INCOFISH WP5. WP5 – Improving the basis for MPA planning. Objectives. Improving the basis for MPA planning with emphasis on sizing and placement of MPAs, and reconciling fishery and biodiversity objectives.

brandon-grant
Download Presentation

Improving the basis for MPA planning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improving the basis for MPA planning INCOFISH WP5

  2. WP5 – Improving the basis for MPA planning Objectives Improving the basis for MPA planning with emphasis on sizing and placement of MPAs, and reconciling fishery and biodiversity objectives. • D5.1 Review of the similarities and differences of planning, stakeholder involvement and effectiveness of selected MPAs. • D5.2 Analysis of size and placement of selected MPAs using spatial ecosystem models provided by WP4. • D5.3 Conceptual model for MPA planning in offshore continental shelf waters. • D5.4 WP5 report. • D5.5 Five publications.

  3. WP5 – Improving the basis for MPA planning D 5.1 Review of MPA Effectiveness Case Study Regions: Northern Gulf of California, Campeche Bank - Gulf of Mexico, East China Sea, North Sea

  4. WP5 – Improving the basis for MPA planning D 5.1 Review of MPA Effectiveness • MPAs show great similarities in objectives and application across a diverse range of marine ecosystems and political settings. • Limited and sporadic monitoring and assessment critically compromises the ability to determine MPA effects. • There is only limited evidence for biodiversity conservation benefits and no evidence for improved fishery yields from the case studies. • Socio-political considerations are as important to MPA success as biophysical considerations.

  5. WP5 – Improving the basis for MPA planning D 5.2Analysis of size and placement of selected MPAs using spatial ecosystem models Case Study Regions: Northern Gulf of California, Campeche Bank, Gulf of Mexico, East China Sea, North Sea, Benguela – Namibia, Gulf of Thailand

  6. WP5 – Improving the basis for MPA planning D 5.2Analysis of size and placement of selected MPAs using spatial ecosystem models • Work just about to commence following the completion of the Ecosystem models. Ready next week…….. • Simulation of existing and proposed MPAs in each ecosystem • Comparison of MPAs for biodiversity conservation and fisheries management. • Single species population models. • Sedentary species • Mobile Species • Are Bad MPAs any good?

  7. WP5 – Improving the basis for MPA planning Outputs Papers: Le Quesne, Shepherd & Hawkins (in press) A comparison of no-take zones and traditional fishery manaagement tools for managing site attached species with a mixed larval pool. Fish and Fisheries. Hui, Xu, Jun, Le Quesne, Sweeting & Polunin (final draft) An overview of spatial management and marine protected areas in the East China Sea. Conservation Biology? Le Quesne & Codling (draft) The role of no-take zones as a fishery management tool for mobile dispersing species. Zetina-Rejón MJ, Arreguín-Sánchez F & Crúz-Escalona VH (draft) An integral trophic model of two interdependent ecosystems at the southern Gulf of Mexico. Lercari, D., Arreguín-Sánchez, F. (draft) Deriving viable harvesting strategies from Mass balance trophic models to contribute to multispecies management in the northern Gulf of California. Le Quesne (draft) Are bad marine protected areas any good, or just a new way of making old mistakes? Reports: Review of similarities and differences of planning, operation, stakeholder involvement and effectiveness of selected MPAs. Deliverable 5.1.

  8. WP5 – Improving the basis for MPA planning Outputs Conference Presentations: International Conference on Coastal Ecosystems: Towards an integrated knowledge for an ecosystem approach, Campeche, México, 2006. Zetina-Rejón MJ, Arreguín-Sánchez F, & Crúz-Escalona VH. Towards an integration of the Campeche bank ecosystem dynamics for ecosystem-based fisheries management. Le Quesne WJF, Shepherd JG, & Hawkins SJ. The implications to management of the relationship between the spatial extent of MPAs, and management regime outside of MPAs. 41st European Marine Biology Symposium, Cork, Ireland, 2006 Lercari D & Arreguín-Sánchez F. Temporal and spatial ecosystem scenarios towards conservation and exploitation conciliation in the northern Gulf of California. Le Quesne WJF. Using MPAs to control the age groups targeted by a fishery; can yield be increased? Zetina-Rejón MJ, Arreguín-Sánchez F, & Crúz-Escalona VH. Towards an MPA strategy on the Campeche Bank for ecosystem-based fisheries management. European Symposium on Marine Protected Areas as a Tool for Fisheries Management and Biodiversity Conservation, Murcia, Spain, 2007 At least 6 presentations have been, or will be, submitted by members of WP5.

More Related