1 / 27

Context-Aware Communication

Explore the concept of context-aware communication to enhance staying in touch, coordinating with friends and family, and being aware of their activities, while minimizing interruptions and information overload.

brantn
Download Presentation

Context-Aware Communication

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Context-Aware Communication Patrick Malatack

  2. Key Idea • Communication is a killer app for ubicomp • Example activities: • Staying in touch • Coordinating with friends and family • Being aware of activities of friends and family • Non-ubicomp evidence • Popularity of Social Networking web sites • Popularity of sharing sites • Popularity of Blogs / Message boards

  3. Problems with Keeping in Touch • Irrelevant messages • Vacation mail, surveys, junk email • Interruptions • During meetings, concerts, movies, dinner, driving • Lack of awareness on callee side • Phone tag, time zone issue (oops!) • Information overload • Can make it hard to find useful messages (ex. delayed flight) • Device overload • Fax, email, landline phone, mobile phone, IM

  4. Readings • Context Aware Computing • 2002, looked at field of context-aware communication specifically and attempted to define and characterize field. • Presented history of devices and inventions in the field • Articulated design principles for C-A Communication • Social Disclosure of Place: From Location Technology to Communication Practices • 2005, designed, developed, evaluated a system for disclosing you location to other people based on user defined settings • Out of PlaceLab

  5. Context-Aware Communication • Main idea: • Use sensors and other pieces of context… • to improve awareness of and communication with others… • while minimizing overload, irrelevancy, and interruptions

  6. “C-A Comm” Working Definition • “C-A Communication” applications apply knowledge of people’s context (and activities) to reduce person-to-person communication barriers • C-A Communication is subset of C-A Computing • Does not include, e.g., control of environment, or apps that filter information about nearby restaurants and printers • Information versus communication • Is the chirping Lovegety an information or communication device? • Article takes broad view of communication

  7. Context-Aware Comm Dimensions Less Privacy Less Common Sense

  8. C-A Communication Research Grouped by application types • Routing • Addressing • Messaging • Caller Awareness • Screening

  9. directing communication to nearby & appropriate devices Routing • Following Callers on PARC’s Etherphone System • Olivetti’s Active Badge Aiding a Telephone Receptionist • Ubiquitous Message Delivery

  10. 50 Etherphones Location registered by Logging in “Visiting” Distinctive ring tones Etherphone 1 Autonomous routing (action) Manual sensing Etherphone 2 Autonomous routing (action) Autonomous sensing More brittle New defaults for visitors 1 2 PARC Etherphone (Swinehart, et al. 1987)

  11. Infrared emitting badges and network of receivers Initial application was an “Aid for a telephone receptionist” Give a person info for tracking down callee Receptionist 1 Autonomous sensing Manual routing Receptionist 2 Autonomous sensing Autonomous routing Less intelligent People wanted to control based on who they were with, where they are, etc. -> more work ORL Active Badge “Aid to a receptionist”(Want & Hopper 1992)

  12. Addressing targeting communication at appropriate people • Context-Aware Mailing List • PARCTAB Virtual Whiteboard

  13. Context-Aware Mailing List(Dey, Abowd & Salber 2001) • In-out board using iButton RF tags • Dynamic e-mail list for directingemail to people who are in the building • “let’s get lunch” • “talk in 5 minutes” • C-A Mailing List • Triggered autonomous action • (could be) Autonomous sensing

  14. Messaging providing the right message at the right time • Contextual Reminder Messages in CybreMinder • MIT’s Active Messenger

  15. CybreMinder(Dey 2000) • To-do items associated with location and context • Can be sent to other people • Context include “forecast is for rain and Bob is leaving home.” • CybreMinder • Autonomous sensing • Autonomous action (delivery)

  16. Providing Awareness • Awareness with AwareNex • Audio Aura • Triggering Real World Meetings with Roomotes • LoveGety Allows others to determine availability to talk

  17. Erfolg’s LoveGety (Awareness) • A Japanese toy (circa 1998) for meeting people, beeps when a compatible partner is nearby. • Detects other devices in a 15 foot range and “bleep” • Blue and Pink models (blue only responds to pink and vice versa) • 3 Modes: • Chat mode: if you're interested in meeting someone for conversation • Karaoke mode: if you're looking for a "playmate," • Get-get mode: for those looking to move straight away into something a bit more intimate. Many spinoffs like Party Bapp-X andMedia Lab’s Meme Tag

  18. Audio Aura(Mynatt 1999) • Auditory cues as people walk around an office place • Going to an empty office creates an audio cue about how long it has been empty • A “group pulse” if people are meeting • Automated sensing • Little automated communication

  19. Users determine wether or not they want to talk Screening • Calls.Calm making Caller-Callee Calm • Context-Call

  20. Calls.Calm (Pedersen 2001) • Calls.Calm uses web phones to mediate communication with subscribers. • A person (a) selects who to call and • (b) is greeted by the callees contact page contextualized and customized for the caller; or if the caller is unknown, • (c) a generic page.

  21. 5 Design Considerations • Improving relevance • Deciding when a communication is relevant to the person’s current (or near future) situation. • For example, getting notification about an email from your travel agent regarding itinerary changes while packing to leave for the airport. • Minimizing disruption • Improving awareness • Reducing overload • Selecting channels

  22. 5 Design Considerations • Improving relevance • Minimizing disruption • Deciding when and how to notify people that they have a communication. • For example, your phone should vibrate and not ring, when you are at the symphony (unless it is truly urgent). • Improving awareness • Reducing overload • Selecting channels

  23. 5 Design Considerations • Improving relevance • Minimizing disruption • Improving awareness • Deciding what information and mechanisms can help people make intelligent communication decisions. • For example, the caller should be told you are at the movies before the call goes through. • Reducing overload • Selecting channels context-aware communication

  24. 5 Design Considerations • Improving relevance • Minimizing disruption • Improving awareness • Reducing overload • Deciding how to reduce the number of communications that don’t apply given your context. • For example, filtering out emails about going to lunch when you are away from the office (or already at lunch). • Selecting channels context-aware communication

  25. 5 Design Considerations • Improving relevance • Minimizing disruption • Improving awareness • Reducing overload • Selecting channels • Deciding which communication device should be used to get in touch with somebody. • For example, routing calls to your home phone instead of your cell phone when you are at home and cellular reception is poor. context-aware communication

  26. Social Disclosure of Place • Reno • J2me application • Nokia 6600 • Cell tower based location estimation • Always on • “avoid real privacy threats” • Minimize deployment barriers

  27. Social Disclosure of Place • Study design • 8 members • Project members or families • 5 were members of the team • Disclosure based on relationship • Accidental disclosures occurred • 8 disclosures a day on average

More Related